Menu Icon Search
Close Search

The Importance of Reading the Evidence

Created August 29, 2012 by Michael Hochman, MD

When I first began working with patients as a third year medical student, I was struck by the variation in how doctors delivered care. One example sticks in my mind: I was evaluating a patient with new-onset depression, and the doctor I was working with started the patient on an antidepressant medication. Later, I was describing the case in our teaching rounds, and a different doctor adamantly disagreed: “In patients like this, I always try psychotherapy first,” he said. I soon realized that depression care is far from standardized. While some doctors favor starting medications immediately in all patients, others typically try psychotherapy first, while a few start both treatments simultaneously.

Which strategy is right? When I finally got around to researching the question a few years later, I discovered that several studies have directly compared the different strategies. These studies clearly show that, in most patients, medications and psychotherapy are equally effective (though recovery may be slightly faster with medications).

Reading these studies made me feel more informed and confident the next time I encountered a patient with depression. But the experience was also unsettling because depression is far from the only disease that is treated differently by different doctors. For example, some doctors commonly recommend surgery for patients with back pain while others rarely do. Some doctors have a lower threshold for starting medications in patients with HIV than others. And some doctors target very low blood sugar levels in patients with diabetes while others use less aggressive targets. How could I possibly have time to review the data on all of these important topics to make informed decisions for my patients?

Though the task seemed daunting, I realized it was important. My experience reading the depression studies had enabled me to treat my patients more effectively, and I suspected the same would be true for many other diseases. So I decided to make the best effort I could to read the key original research on a handful of important topics, recognizing that I never would have time to read everything I would want to.

To my surprise, this effort proved easier and more rewarding than I could have imagined. Though my knowledge of the medical literature remains far from optimal – and many of my colleagues are much better versed than me – I have realized that knowing even a few key studies goes a long way. It turns out that in many areas of medicine, one or two well-designed studies have defined clinical practice. A basic understanding of these key studies can greatly enhance decision-making.

Reading these key studies has also revealed some themes that have enhanced my perspective on patient care. Most notably, I have learned that medical treatments and technologies are often not as effective as many doctors and patients believe them to be. For example, statins – the supposed wonder-drug of 21st century medicine – actually only reduce cardiovascular events slightly. According to one of the best studies on this topic, the JUPITER trial, approximately 200 patients without cardiovascular disease would need to be treated for two years to prevent one death. In addition, the study raised the possibility that statins increase the risk of diabetes. And an analysis summarizing the data on mammography showed that for every 2,000 women offered screening for 10 years, only one will be saved from breast cancer while 10 will be diagnosed with cancer and treated potentially unnecessarily.

In addition, I have learned that many treatments that have proven to be effective were studied in circumstances that may not reflect real-world conditions, and thus the results may not be broadly applicable. For example, a famous trial establishing that medications are superior to psychotherapy for children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder was conducted using an intensive treatment protocol in which doctors met frequently with the study children and received regular feedback from parents and teachers. Such a strategy may not be realistic in many settings.

The lessons I learned from reading just a few key studies had an important impact on my thinking. I now pay more attention to patient preference and less to medical dogma. For example, when I encounter a patient who prefers not to undergo mammography, I respect the decision because it is very unlikely she will be helped by the test anyway – and might possibly be harmed by the unnecessary discovery of a cancer that otherwise may not have caused problems.

More importantly, making an effort to read original medical research has shown me that when I encounter a clinical question, it is worth the time to review the literature for an answer. Frequently, a good study won’t be available to address the question, but at least by looking it is possible to provide patients with the most evidence-based information. Ultimately, I believe, this will lead to better care than decisions based largely on experience.

Dr. Hochman is a general internist. He recently published 50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know (

// Share //

// Recent Articles //

  • Applying for Residency

  • Posted September 25, 2017 by Brent Schnipke
  • Last month I wrote about the early part of 4th year as a kind of second-look for medical students – an occasion for confirming specialty choice, or perhaps changing one’s mind altogether. For me, it has been an enjoyable and enlightening process to revisit the specialties I was most interested in and examine them more...VIEW >
  • Rejection Happens

  • Posted September 22, 2017 by The Short Coat Podcast
  • “When you’re following your inner voice, doors tend to eventually open for you, even if they mostly slam at first.”― Kelly Cutrone Related...VIEW >
  • Quiz of the Week: What Audible Finding is Consistent With This Presentation?

  • Posted September 22, 2017 by Figure 1
  • A 40-year-old male presents to the emergency department with sharp chest pain and palpitations. He says the pain is worse when he lies down and is exacerbated by coughing, but improves when he moves to a seated position. He was recently diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after investigation for recurrent cyanotic discoloration and numbness...VIEW >
  • Medical, +1 MORE
  • Planning and Time Management for Boards Success

  • Posted September 22, 2017 by Boards Boot Camp
  • No matter how you plan on preparing for boards, getting started sooner than later is a good policy to apply. First, when should you start prepping for boards? The quick answer is DAY 1 of medical school – the better your foundation in med school, the more you will be able to build on top...VIEW >
  • 12 Tips to Prepare for the COMLEX

  • Posted September 21, 2017 by H. Jeff Nazar, DO
  • If you’re like most medical students, your “To-Do” list is probably never ending! Between hectic class schedules, rotation schedules, and studying for your shelf exams, you’re probably feeling lucky when you can get a full night’s sleep and a nice warm shower. I’m sure that the last thing you want to be thinking about is...VIEW >
  • Medical, +1 MORE
  • 5 Steps to Earning a 90th-Percentile MCAT Score

  • Posted September 21, 2017 by Lauren Curtis
  • Famous Notre Dame football coach Lou Holtz once remarked, “When my teams took second place, the fans called me an idiot. A guy who finished last in medical school is still called a ‘doctor’. Hardly seems fair.” Lou’s pithy comment may be true for students already in medical school. However, if you are a premed...VIEW >
  • 5 Ways to Study for the MCAT Using Your Smart Phone

  • Posted September 20, 2017 by Andrew George
  • You can do almost anything with your smart phone these days. You can video call a friend in China, order pizza with the click of a button, and even see in the dark! So, if your smart phone can help you do these and an almost infinitely large number of other things, then why can’t...VIEW >

// Forums //