SDN Logo
 
 

Northeast Ohio Medical University College of Medicine (NEOMED) Interview Feedback Summary

Rootstown, OH

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 50% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
6.6
Mixed

Mixed experience; organization and communication appear average with varied impressions and occasional stress.

Based on 210 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school as average compared to other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most rank this school as average compared to other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the candidate's motivation for pursuing medicine, their strengths and weaknesses, future career aspirations, experiences influencing their decision to become a doctor, and their views on healthcare and the medical field. Some respondents mentioned questions specific to the MMI format, suggesting they may have been under a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting question asked at Northeast Ohio Medical University College of Medicine (NEOMED) discussed a wide range of topics, including personal strengths and weaknesses, ethical dilemmas, role models, and hypothetical scenarios like handling test leaks. Some responses indicated an MMI format with questions on integrity and professionalism, potentially under a nondisclosure agreement, while others highlighted questions about balancing extracurricular activities, book preferences, and future career plans.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Northeast Ohio Medical University College of Medicine (NEOMED) discussed a wide range of topics, including personal motivations for medicine, ethical scenarios, and reflections on the healthcare system. Some respondents mentioned questions related to ethics committees, medical field challenges, and personal characteristics. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on references to nondisclosure agreements and a variety of scenarios presented to applicants.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing their application materials, practicing with mock interviews, studying common interview questions from sources like StudentDoctor.net, and researching the school's website and resources. Many also sought advice from advisors, discussed potential questions with others, and engaged in self-reflection on personal experiences and motivations for pursuing a medical career.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and warmth of the faculty, staff, and students, as well as the conversational and low-pressure interview atmosphere. They appreciated the tight-knit community, modern facilities, and the personalized attention given during the admissions process. Some also mentioned the school's singular focus on medical education and the positive interactions with current students.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants were primarily concerned about the school's rural location, limited facilities, lack of engagement during the admissions process, outdated facilities, and long class hours. Suggestions included improving the admissions process, updating facilities, and considering changes to the curriculum to enhance student experience and engagement.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the potential for being waitlisted, hidden fees, the interview structure (good cop/bad cop), and the diverse student body at the school. They also recommended being prepared for the interview day schedule, comfortable shoes for walking, and not expecting immediate acceptance notifications.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interview process to be relaxed and conversational, with a mix of positive and neutral impressions about the school and its facilities. Feedback highlighted the friendly staff, ease of conversation during interviews, and the unique aspects of the program, while some expressed concerns about the location and facilities.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should conduct live interviews instead of pre-recorded ones to show respect and engage with applicants effectively. However, they also appreciated the efforts made to create an enjoyable experience during the admissions process.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Cleveland Hopkins International Airport (CLE)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Other or at another housing option.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel among the responses is **Holiday Inn Express**.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as average
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 N/A Good Virtual
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2023-24 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Poor Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Poor N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Great N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A