SDN Logo
 
 

Oregon Health & Sciences University School of Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Portland, OR

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 21% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools cover a wide range of topics, including personal strengths and weaknesses, experiences in medicine and research, motivations for pursuing a medical career, challenges overcome, and views on healthcare systems. Some respondents noted being asked about specific details from their applications, while others were questioned about their interest in medicine and their future goals. Additionally, several respondents mentioned engaging in Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) where questions were tailored to their application, indicating a structured format possibly under a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Oregon Health & Sciences University School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics including personal experiences, favorite books, specific details from applications, ethical dilemmas, and future aspirations. While some interviews were conversational and standard, others delved into scenarios like the MMI format, history, health care policies, and unique insights, with a reminder that respondents may have been under a nondisclosure agreement due to the nature of the questions asked.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at Oregon Health & Sciences University School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including scenarios about helping others succeed, personal motivations for becoming a doctor, defining professionalism, and challenges in balancing ambition and competition in a clinical setting. While some mentioned a rigorous Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format with nondisclosure agreements, others faced standard questions about their strengths, weaknesses, and future goals in medicine.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by engaging in mock interviews, practicing with friends, reviewing their application materials, reading about current healthcare events, and seeking advice from current students. Many emphasized the importance of being knowledgeable about healthcare policy and the school, while also recommending staying calm and not overloading on scenario practice.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and supportiveness of the staff, faculty, and students at OHSU, as well as the beautiful campus and facilities. They highlighted the collaborative and non-competitive atmosphere, early clinical exposure, and the emphasis on individualized attention and mentorship. Many also expressed admiration for Portland as a city and the school's commitment to creating well-rounded clinicians.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants were negatively impressed by a variety of factors at OHSU, including uninterested interviewers, cold campus culture, lack of structured information during orientation, outdated facilities, high tuition costs, disorganization during interview days, limited opportunities for research, and the isolated campus location. Suggestions included improving interviewer engagement, providing more comprehensive orientation sessions, updating facilities, addressing tuition costs, and enhancing the overall organization and experience of interview days.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known that their 1:1 interviews held more weight than MMIs, that the interviews focused on personal characteristics rather than general questions, and that there would be significant downtime between interviews. Suggestions included bringing a book for waiting periods, being prepared for a lot of walking between buildings, and ensuring comfortable shoes for the day.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found OHSU to be a great school with a strong program, friendly faculty, and a beautiful location. Some expressed concerns about the interview process, including inconsistencies between interviewers, long waiting times, and mixed feedback on the school's culture and interview structure. Suggestions included better communication with applicants, more consistency in interviewer styles, and a more engaging interview day experience.
  • great school, great program, terrible response time for decisions.
  • I thought the MMI (Kira Talent) was relatively unimpressive and a poor reflection of what it is intended to assess.
  • Just prep a bunch of different experiences that fall into categories of facing adversity, leadership, academic adversity etc. to pull from for questions
  • Everyone was amazing to talk to and really great. The MMI was stressful and fun.
  • I really liked this interview.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest that the admissions office should improve communication by providing timely updates through email, rather than relying on snail mail or manual portal checks. They also recommend faster decision-making processes and more efficient handling of secondary applications to enhance the overall applicant experience.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Friends or family or with friends or family.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2010-11 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A