SDN Logo
 
 

University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry Interview Feedback Summary

Edmonton, AB

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 16% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
7.4
Good

Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.

Based on 148 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was moderately friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was moderately responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about handling stress, personal experiences with healthcare scenarios like blood transfusions, motivations for pursuing medicine, volunteer activities, and ethical dilemmas such as abortion requests. Many respondents mentioned facing a Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format where specific question topics were kept confidential, possibly under a nondisclosure agreement, with questions revolving around personal attributes, career motivations, and ethical scenarios in healthcare settings.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry discussed a wide range of topics, including opinions on societal issues, personal values, and ethical dilemmas. The variety of questions ranged from discussing the impact of the oil boom in Alberta to sharing thoughts on topics like capital punishment, euthanasia, and alternative medicine, reflecting the diverse nature of interview inquiries.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry discussed scenarios involving compassion fatigue, ethics, difficult patient decisions, professionalism challenges, and personal integrity. The interviews may have been in an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements, with questions focusing on ethical dilemmas, personal experiences, healthcare funding, and professionalism in various scenarios.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 40 - 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a in a group interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Many applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing medical ethics, current events, and their application materials, while also engaging in introspection and practicing with mock interviews. They also sought feedback from friends, med students, doctors, and online resources to enhance their readiness for the interview process.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness, warmth, and hospitality of interviewers and current medical students, as well as the engaging environment during the interview process. Additionally, the top positive aspects highlighted were the exceptional facilities, enthusiastic and supportive community, and the stress-free and accommodating atmosphere created by the admissions staff and student volunteers.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative feedback regarding disorganized or unenthusiastic tour guides, lack of engagement or special treatment for applicants, tense or uninviting environments, and insufficient information sessions or tours. Suggestions included improving tour organization, providing more engaging and informative experiences for applicants, and creating a more welcoming and supportive atmosphere during interviews.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the relaxed atmosphere of the interview, the specific interview format, the location of the best parking, and the small interview room setup. They also mentioned being surprised by the lack of ethics questions and the importance of managing nerves during the interview process.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interview experience positive, with interviewers described as friendly and trying to keep candidates relaxed. Some mentioned feeling nervous initially but gradually becoming more comfortable during the interview process.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

No responses
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Edmonton International Airport (YEG)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2009-10 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2009-10 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2009-10 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2009-10 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor N/A
2009-10 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A