Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.
๐Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 25% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.
Based on 65 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the candidate's motivation for pursuing medicine, their interest in a specific program or school, their ability to handle ethical dilemmas, and their problem-solving skills in challenging scenarios. Some respondents mentioned scenarios involving alcohol or gas smells, underserved populations, and addressing emergencies, while others highlighted questions about personal motivations and experiences. Additionally, references to "MMI" or "Multiple Mini Interview" suggest that the interviews may have been structured in that format, possibly involving a nondisclosure agreement.
With respect to physicians being gatekeepers, how would you address a crowd of people in a developing country when the food drop-off that week was spoiled? What actions would you take if you came upon an automobile accident in which the driver seemed to be drunk and injured and there was a strong smell of gas?
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Western Ontario Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry discussed a variety of topics including ethical scenarios, rural medicine, preference for public or private healthcare, and the cost of higher education. Many responses indicated the interview format may have been an MMI, with some participants mentioning signing a nondisclosure agreement regarding the specific questions asked during the process.
Interviewer stated, ''This is going to be a poorly articulated question. Perhaps you can make sense of it...He (purposely) rambled on about the SARS situation and eventually talked about doctors conforming to their instructions or disregarding them and returning to work infected.
What do you think about the cost of higher education, what should be done about it, what kind of advice would you give a high-school graduate about the expenses
although, i was asked to sign a confidentiality statement, and thus, i cannot divulge these questions, there is no need to worry! all the questions that were asked were the expected ones that you have i'm sure already prepared for!
What specific group of people in Canada need specific consideration for health care? (After I answered - And supppose you were the physician of this group - how would you solve the problems associated with their health care?)
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Western Ontario Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry discussed scenarios involving ethical dilemmas, resource allocation in healthcare, and challenges in healthcare delivery. The interviews may have been in MMI format with a nondisclosure agreement, as some responses allude to multiple questions being asked and similarities in difficult questions shared among interviewees.
The ones with multiple questions within the question that they rattled off all at once. hard to keep track of what had been answered.
After discussing in depth a major project I worked on during an internship, I was asked if there was anything I would do differently. I couldn't think of anything.
What questions would you ask to an elderly mother, who had just fallen and hurt herself but did not want to move into a retirement home and her daughter who felt that her mother needed to move in order to be safe?
"Comment on one group of people in Canada requiring specialized/distinct healthcare". I said aboriginals because of potential conflicts with traditional beliefs and medicine...
Most respondents had an interview of 40 - 50 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a in a group interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by researching the Canadian healthcare system, studying ethics, reviewing the school's website, doing mock interviews, practicing questions, and seeking advice from current medical students. Many emphasized the importance of staying calm and relaxed during the interview and learning from past experiences to improve their performance.
Little bit of reading of canadian health care system, reviewed ethics etc.
I bombed my first interview at another school because I thought it would be better to sound genuine and unrehearsed. I learned my lesson and did a couple practise ones with friends.
Mock interview, this site, reviewed Western's website (particularly curriculum objectives and learning outcomes), read Romanow report and other similar ones, read newspaper daily, etc.
Applicants were positively impressed by the beautiful campus, friendly and close-knit student body, well-organized program, and the effort made by interviewers to create a comfortable environment. Some also appreciated the closed-file interview style and the accommodating nature of the admissions process.
Nothing outstanding, a formal interview as expected
However, I am very appreciative in that they looked past my substandard MCAT and interviewed me based on my research experience.
The interviewers put extra effort into making me feel comfortable during the interview so they could really get to know me. It really made me feel welcomed
The video was funny and the students seemed to really love their school. The program also impressed me, although it seemed like way too much lecture time first year.
students are extremely nice and they really seem like a very close knit group. They seem to have a lot of fun on top of studying. Everything was also very very well organized.
The closed file nature of the interview was really interesting! It let me guide my own interview since we could only talk about experiences that I brought up. Make sure to know what you want to say at the beginning when they say "Okay, we only know your name thus far, what do you want us to know about you?"
How friendly the students and faculty were! Everyone just kept smiling and offering to help me do things! Absolutely unbelievable how much the entire Meds 2006 class was there FOR the interviewees!
Many applicants were negatively impressed by the perceived arrogance of students, lack of enthusiasm during interviews, and the emphasis on party life over academics during campus tours. Suggestions include ensuring interviewers engage in dialogue with candidates, students show genuine enthusiasm, and the school highlights academic aspects more prominently.
How arrogant the students were. Also, the one interviewer kept doing the whole head-bob-I'm-sooo-tired thing. Compared to MMI interviews I have also had, panel interview was awkward and less effective IMO.
There was no recycling program in place at the lunch which was provided. Also, the student's seemed a little young. Not in a bad way, but they tended to emphasize how Western was the--and I'm quoting here--"Bestern." Following this philosophy, instead of emphasizing their academic side, they focused a lot on the party life in London. This is something I'd like to know, but our tour guids got so excited while describing city-life that I thought they might flash me (okay... so maybe I wasn't negatively impressed persae).
The interview itself. My interviewers seemed disinterested and the questions were simply read of a list. There was no dialogue whatsoever and I never felt at all comfortable.
The interview...it was closed file, so I assumed the interviewers would ask me to elaborate, or question me further on my answers. Nothing like this at all, they just moved onto the next question. By not feeding off my answers, and following a rigid set of questions, I didn't think they got a good idea of who I was.
my interview. I was the last one of the day and my interviewers looked absolutely uninterested. The committee member looked like he was going to pass out. The faculty member was really a robot, and although i thought the med student was nice, I think I caught him snoozing off. bad experience? yeah...
Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time that research experience, particularly at the Masters level, was highly valued during the interview process. They also mentioned the importance of being well-versed in the unique aspects of the curriculum and being prepared for standardized questions with limited room for personal elaboration.
Their tendency is take those with the most research experience possible (expected), thus students with Masters have a significant advantage versus undergraduates.
Western Road actually changes name before intersecting with the street I was on. So I went passed whatever that road is called and ended up asking for directions.
I wished that I had really understood the very interesting implications of "Ecosystem Health": a component of the curriculum that is certainly unique to UWO. Read-up on that for sure.
The pressure associated with a closed-file interview where the panel asked no supplementary questions. I should have taken half the interview to answer the "tell us about yourself" question because really that was the only one that would allow them to get to know you. Also, that everyone would get asked the same questions, even at the interview two weeks later. To me this just doesn't seem fair.
Well, to twist the question a little: I wish I knew that Western was going to end up being the school where I do my MD. During interview time, I had two schools I had rather gone to, but only AFTER I got acceptances at those two schools did I suddenly decide I wanted Western the most afterall!
Nothing really. The interviewers don't know ANYTHING about you before your interview so be prepared for that, i.e. they don't have your autobio sketch.
The most common feedback and suggestions shared by applicants include mixed feelings about the interview experience at Western University, with mentions of friendly interviewers, structured questions, closed-file format, and the importance of being oneself during the interview. Some applicants found the experience positive, while others felt underwhelmed by the format or interviewer reactions.
Decent. The interviewers were the friendliest in that they always had pleasant and compassionate expressions on their faces. Students were nice. I came only for the interview and left soon after, so I was not able to meet a lot of students or watch their video
Went well. Met some people I had met earlier at other interviews. Students seemed genuinely happy. There were many of them to help guide us where we were needed.
A very good all around experience. My interviewers were very attentive and provided me with many good follow-up questions. Being undecided driving into London, I knew when leaving that I would be happy there.
Great. I enjoyed it. I was a little late in being called into the room and this became agonizing because med students and other interviewees would constantly pass by me and exclaim "oh you STILL haven't gone in yet?" - in the end, I did get the 45 min in there but I didn't have my calm when I walked in there in the beginning (as a result of the long wait).
Western seems it would be a great school to study medicine, especially with the revamped interior and the influx of new money. As for the interview, the closed-book approach seems a bit off-putting, but there is a good way to deal with it: Put everything on the table with the first question (within reason)and let the interviewers take it from there.
Well if it's not obvious from the preceding comments my experience was largely negative. The day itself was very well organized and the students were friendly, but my specific interviewers were stone-faced and disinterested .
Western seems like a great med school. At least from the students' enthusiasm, they seem really into helping you out. The interviewers however looked like I was boring them to death. I tried to crack a few jokes and it was a dead audience (perhaps I'm just not funny). So, how to succeed? Find out the questions they asked to the candidate that's in your interview room before you. Very likely the questions will be exactly the same. I'm not kidding. They have a sheet of set questions. If you can find out the questions before hand you'll feel more prepared. Even questions from people the week before will likely have resemblence to questions you will be asked.
lots of scenario questions.
ethics/current events/political issues are WAY too overemphasized. to other potential interviewees, just relax. esp if you've grown up in canada all your life, you'll already know the basic of the systems and if you don't i think you're in big trouble. overall a good experience, not stressful.
The interview was very comfortable and all three interviewers were attentive, relaxed and interesting people! The med students were loads of fun, and spent a lot of time getting to know the interviewees. Western has become my #1 choice after this experience.
Western wasn't my first choice at the time of the interview and I felt very confident about my chances at two other schools. As a result, I was very relaxed. I even played air guitar and sang during my UWO interview. The panel liked that apparently....
I guess the secret is, and always will be, 'just be yourself'. The air guitar thing was just something I would have done in most conversations if I was asked the same questions the interviewers asked. I didn't think it right to act like some other person so I just did what I would have normally done, and I'm glad that was the message that was conveyed.
Pretty relaxed, really short. I was expecting them to ask "tell us about yourself" as the first question but this never came up. I had to bring that spiel up at the end. Everyone I talked to was in and out in under half an hour. It was really straight forward. The interviewers weren't super friendly at first but we were all laughing by the end of it. The school is great.