Menu Icon Search
Close Search

Stanford University Program Individual Response

For more details, click on the categories below

Basic Info

What is your in-state status?:

In state

On what date did the interview take place?:

2/1/2009

How do you rank this residency among ALL other residencies?:

8 out of 10

How do you rank this residency among other residencies to which you've applied?:

8 out of 10

What is your ranking of this program's facilities?:

10 out of 10

What is your ranking of this program's location?:

8 out of 10

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?:

8 out of 10

What was the stress level of the interview?:

5 out of 10

How do you think you did?:

6 out of 10

How did the interview impress you?:

Positively

Questions

How long was the interview?:

30 minutes

How many people interviewed you?:

2

What was the style of the interview?:

One-on-one

What impressed you positively?:

Really nice free-standing children's hospital (attached to main Stanford hospital). Pretty cush schedule with less q4 and more elective time than other programs. Residents seemed happy and program takes care of them. New PD who seemed enthusiastic with lots of ideas for the program. Good EMR that residents said makes life easy. Lots of international health and research opportunities. People go on to great fellowships. Report as inappropriate

What impressed you negatively?:

Did not meet many residents during the interview day. Program seems focused on very quaternary patient population (ie transplant pts) at LPCH. Not sure about getting enough gen peds exposure. Get gen peds at other sites (Santa Clara Valley) where you spend less time. Palo Alto seemed kind of boring and pricey, though Stanford offers some cheaper resident housing which some residents live in. Report as inappropriate

How was your interview day? Please summarize.:

Breakfast, welcome from chiefs, morning report, talk by PD, interviews, lunch, tour, cookies and wrap-up with PD/chiefs. Report as inappropriate

Travel

Report ALL Responses as inappropriate