Mixed experience; organization and communication appear average with varied impressions and occasional stress.
Based on 24 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
Applicants commonly reported being asked about their interest in psychology, qualities of a good psychologist, and qualities of a good scientist/researcher. The questions suggest a focus on motivations, personal qualities, and potential for success in the field.
Students said most interesting question asked at Alliant International University California School of Professional Psychology discussed approaches when dealing with difficult clients and brainstorming solutions for a scenario involving undergraduates and suicide during midterms in a group interview setting.
Students said most difficult question asked at Alliant International University California School of Professional Psychology discussed qualities of a good scientist/researcher.
What are 3 qualities of a good scientist/researcher?
Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a in a group interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by utilizing resources like SDN, practicing mock interviews, researching the program's website, and reviewing personal statements. Many also practiced common interview questions found online to feel more confident and prepared.
SDN, personal statement, mock interviews, looking up interview questions on google.
Applicants were positively impressed by the friendly and welcoming atmosphere created by faculty and staff during the interview process. They also appreciated the resources and support available, such as access to wireless internet, computer labs, and library facilities, enhancing their overall experience at the institution.
I had two interviewers-one professor and one current student (interviews were seperate) who were both very nice. The grad student seemed very happy with what the program provided her and the professor seemed interested in getting to know my interests and why I felt I was a good fit for their program. Any other staff I came across were very friendly and helpful.
They have wireless internet access, 4 computer labs, a big library, and are linked to the UC and Cal-State systems for inter-library loans and articles.
(This was at the San Francisco campus)
Applicants were commonly unimpressed by the lack of financial aid options and funding support, with many feeling the burden of limited resources and high tuition costs. Additionally, concerns were raised about the lack of clarity on research subjects, the competitiveness of other applicants, and the rushed nature of interactions during the interview process. Suggestions include improving transparency on financial aid, enhancing communication about research opportunities, and ensuring a more engaging and thorough interview experience for applicants.
There is no financial aid funding other than student loans and even then they don't allow you to take out enough to get by on. Ideally they don't want you to work while you are in a doctorate program but I find it difficult when I only get about $5,000 per semester after paying tuition. I had to take out another loan (Gradplus). The San Diego campus got rid of their bookstore which means you have to buy all your books online.
I felt like the school was trying to sell themselves to me rather than finding out if I am a good match. Other applicants were not very competitive- many had not taken psychology classes prior to interviewing or have research experience. The school does not offer funding.
The interviewer seemed to hurry us along a bit. I'm not sure if he was trying to sound engaged in our answers or if he really just wanted a very short answer. He did it to everyone, with a lot of ''mmhmm'' and ''yes'' while we were talking.
Applicants commonly wished they had known about the timing of loan disbursement and group interview format ahead of time to better prepare and plan accordingly.
That I wasn't getting my loan money until the second week of classes. It made buying books a bit difficult, especially since I had to buy them online.
Applicants generally expressed satisfaction with program quality, faculty support, and peer relationships, despite concerns about cost and campus technology. They appreciated the facilities and location, but some noted drawbacks such as campus appearance and nearby tourist activity.
Despite being expensive I am very happy with what the program has provided me so far. The faculty are passionate about psychology and very supportive, they really want to see you succeed. My peers are nice and we all seem to get along well. I am very happy with my decision to attend here.
It was a good experience. I liked the facilities; they are bigger than they look from the outside. I think being directly across from Pier 39 may become a negative thing with the traffic and tourists, but at least the campus is near things. The student giving the tour really tried to sell the school to us; she seemed happy with her decision to go there.