SDN Logo
 
 

Barry University School of Podiatric Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Miami Shores, FL

Podiatry Schools | Public For-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

👋 Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 32% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
⭐ Overall Impressions
SDN Interview Experience Score
7.7
Good

Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.

Based on 394 responses
Score Reference:
9–10 Exceptional 8–8.9 Very Good 7–7.9 Good 6–6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
💬 Interview Questions

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about reasons for choosing podiatry over other specialties or professions, experiences in the field, academic performance explanations, future goals in the profession, time management skills, and personal motivations behind pursuing podiatric medicine. Some respondents mentioned being asked questions related to Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) and nondisclosure agreements, suggesting a structured interview format with strict confidentiality requirements may have been in place.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Barry University School of Podiatric Medicine discussed various topics, including naming podiatry specialties, describing successful coursework, reflecting on clinical cases, addressing personal challenges, defining podiatry, explaining the field to others, discussing residency preferences, showcasing leadership experiences, and demonstrating creativity. Additionally, some responses indicated a Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format and possible nondisclosure agreements due to the nature of the questions asked.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at Barry University School of Podiatric Medicine discussed reasons for choosing podiatry over MD or DO, explaining academic discrepancies, experiences of discrimination, and scenarios like amputation discussions. The interview format may have been an MMI based on responses, with a focus on personal experiences, academic challenges, and motivations for pursuing podiatry, while some respondents noted stress related to pre-interview questionnaires.
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 1 person.

What was the stress level of the interview?

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Many applicants prepared for the interview by utilizing Student Doctor Network (SDN) interview feedback, reviewing their application materials, such as personal statements and resumes, and researching the school's website. Some also engaged in mock interviews, spoke with current students or alumni, and practiced answering potential questions out loud to sound more conversational and not rehearsed.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were positively impressed by the friendliness of the staff, faculty, and students, the beautiful campus, the wide range of clinical opportunities, the welcoming interview process, and the opportunities for research and specialization. They appreciated the supportive atmosphere, individual attention from admissions staff, and the emphasis on holistic evaluation beyond academic metrics.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants expressed concerns about the outdated facilities, surrounding neighborhood, lack of structured interviews, long wait times, and lack of engagement from staff. Suggestions from applicants include improving facilities, enhancing the interview process, and providing more interactive and informative campus tours.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the relaxed and informal nature of the interview process, the need to sell themselves more confidently, the amount of walking involved, and the traffic in the area. Suggestions were also made to arrive early, be prepared for essay questions, and consider the cost of living and transportation options in the Miami area.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally provided positive feedback about the school's atmosphere, staff, and programs, mentioning the friendly and encouraging environment. Some expressed surprise at the positive experience compared to online forums, highlighting the importance of visiting and interviewing to form an accurate opinion.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should improve communication and response times, provide a clear schedule for the interview day, and ensure that interview questions align with the holistic approach promised. Some also recommended considering multiple interviewers and earlier lunch times for interviewees.
📍 On-Site Experience

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by Admissions staff personnel

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by airplane to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent between $401 and $500.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel among the responses provided is "Best Western."

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 No change 😐 Poor Virtual
2020-21 Positively 🙂 Great Virtual
2020-21 Positively 🙂 Average N/A
2020-21 Negatively ☹️ Average N/A
2019-20 Positively 🙂 Good N/A
2019-20 Positively 🙂 Great N/A
2019-20 Positively 🙂 Great N/A
2019-20 Positively 🙂 Good N/A
2019-20 Positively 🙂 Good N/A
2018-19 Positively 🙂 Good N/A
2018-19 Positively 🙂 Good N/A
2018-19 Positively 🙂 Great N/A
2017-18 Positively 🙂 Good N/A
2017-18 Positively 🙂 Good N/A
2017-18 Positively 🙂 Good N/A
2017-18 Positively 🙂 Great N/A
2017-18 Positively 🙂 Great N/A
2016-17 N/A Average N/A
2015-16 Positively 🙂 Great N/A
2015-16 Positively 🙂 Great N/A