Length, number, and type of interviews
๐
Length:
50 Minutes Average
๐
Number:
4.5 Interviews Average
๐ฅ
Interview Type (Interaction):
0% One-on-One
100% Group Interview
๐
File Type:
0% Open-File
100% Closed-File
HARTFORD-PSY-COMP interviews are an average of 50 minutes, with an average of 4.5 interviews. 0% of interviews are one-on-one, and 100% are closed-file.
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked questions at medical schools include inquiring about preferred theoretical orientation and asking how someone close would describe the interviewee. These questions provide insight into the candidate's approach to patient care and personal qualities.
What was the most interesting question?
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Hartford College of Arts and Sciences discussed the best and worst aspects of human nature.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by revisiting their application materials, researching the program or organization, and reviewing their personal statements. Many also mentioned refreshing their understanding of the program or position they were applying for.
-
Re-read my application, researched the website, checked sdn.net :)
-
Reviewed my personal statement and reviewed literature about the program. Didn't do too much.
-
Re-reading about the program, reviewing the essay I sent them
What was the most difficult question?
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Hartford College of Arts and Sciences discussed various inquiries, including ethical scenarios, personal challenges, and conflict resolution situations. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) with potential nondisclosure agreements in place based on the responses mentioning 'nondisclosure' or 'non-disclosure'.
What impressed you positively?
Applicants were impressed by the friendly and supportive faculty, as well as the enthusiasm of current students, which positively influenced their perception of the program. This led to an overall positive experience and an increased ranking of the school among the applicants.
-
I LOVED everything about the interview. The faculty were all in attendance to meet us and were all friendly and laid-back.
-
The faculty seemed very supportive and the current students were enthusiastic about the program. The overall experience was positive and the school moved up significantly in my ranking of programs.
What impressed you negatively?
Applicants commonly expressed disappointment with the lack of financial support available and inconsistency in the interactions with faculty and students during the interview process, which made it difficult to gauge the program's overall environment and culture. Additionally, some applicants found group interviews to be ineffective and suggested improvements to provide a better understanding of the program.
-
Nothing!
-
Nothing, although it is a shame they don't offer much financial support.
-
Grad students did not seem to know that much about the program, some faculty seemed sort of cold while others were very helpful (no uniformity in the experience and could not get a good feel for the program's ''personality''), group interviews were not a great idea
What did you wish you had known ahead of time?
Many applicants expressed a desire for more information on faculty resources and clinical placements, noting limited access to certain populations. They recommended researching these aspects thoroughly to ensure alignment with their academic and career goals.