Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the impact of current challenges on the field, such as how they affect the counseling profession, as well as assessing the objectivity of psychologists. Additionally, some respondents may have encountered an MMI format and possibly signed a nondisclosure agreement during their interviews.
Something like... given the challenges of our modern times, how do you think these will impact the counseling field, and your role in in specifically?
Students said most interesting question asked at New York University Graduate School of Arts & Science discussed the biggest problem with the field of counseling psychology and whether psychologists can truly be objective in their work.
What do you feel is the biggest problem with the field of counseling psychology?
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt negatively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as high stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a in a group interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by researching the program and speaking with current students to learn about the interview format and expectations. This approach helped them gain insights and feel more confident during the interview process.
Read up on the program, talked with current students about the interview format
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the quality of NYU's faculty, resources, library, and student center. They also appreciated the enthusiasm of the professors, diversity of interests, and opportunities available at the university.
Applicants were generally disappointed by awkward and unnatural group interviews, where they felt they couldn't showcase themselves effectively due to time constraints and high competition. Additionally, negative impressions were formed due to poor department facilities, rude professors, lack of individual interaction with faculty members, and insufficient funding despite being in a well-resourced institution.
The group interview felt awkward and unnatural. I don't think anyone really came across great in that format. There were 28 people interviewed for 4 spots, and we were divided into groups of 7. Seemed like everyone was trying to quickly throw in their two cents before running out of time...
Many applicants expressed a wish to have known in advance about the limited funding available. It is important for future applicants to be aware of potential financial constraints and plan accordingly.
Applicants commonly expressed feeling disrespected during the interview process, with feedback highlighting the competitive nature of the selection process and the emphasis on group dynamics. Additionally, applicants appreciated the quick notification of acceptance status, diversity of interview components, and positive aspects such as good food and student-led tours.
Awful, I felt like I was incredibly disrespected as an applicant.
Very short. 40 people competing for 4 spots. Group interviews with 6 prospective students and 2 faculty, random questions not necessarily related to psychology. Group dynamics seemed most important. Then group interviews with students, who griped about lack of funding but seemed happy otherwise. Optional tour led by student. Good food. You most likely will find out that day whether you're in or not.