Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was unfriendly.
No responses
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was unresponsive.
No responses
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools were about the applicant's future goals and aspirations, such as "Where do you see yourself in 5-10 years?" The interviews were described as conversational, focusing on basic topics like reasons for choosing the school, research interests, and current experiences, with no tricky questions reported.
Where do you see yourself in 5-10 years?
Aside from that it was just a conversation
The interviews were very conversational and not so much of a question-answer style. They asked me the most basic questions (i.e. why UConn, research interests, current experiences), but nothing tricky.
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Connecticut College of Liberal Arts and Sciences discussed questions regarding the program and if the interviewees had any inquiries about it.
They asked if I had any questions re: their program.
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Connecticut College of Liberal Arts and Sciences discussed included inquiries about other medical school applications.
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 5 or more people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as high stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Many applicants prepared for the interview by thoroughly researching the program and faculty members, including reading papers, articles, and visiting the department's website. This allowed them to gain a deeper understanding of the research being conducted and demonstrate their interest and knowledge during the interview.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the strong emphasis on the scientist-practitioner model, excellent clinical training and research opportunities, as well as the friendly and supportive student community. They also highlighted the exceptional faculty members, quality of clinical training, student enthusiasm, and the size of the campus as positive aspects of their experience.
A true scientist-practioner model! Amazing clinical training and research opportunities
Students were really nice, social and happy
Applicants were mostly disappointed by the inconvenient location of storrs, with many students living far from the campus. The cancellation of an interview day without providing an alternative solution left a negative impression, suggesting a lack of effort in accommodating candidates and potentially reflecting on how current students are treated.
U Conn canceled interview day due to snow but I had already flown out. I was disappointed by how quickly they gave up on the whole thing and didn't try to come up with an alternative meeting place. It left me with the impression that the faculty there are far more interested in doing their research than making an effort to reach out to the interviewees... definitely a sign of how they probably treat their current students.
Many applicants wished they had known ahead of time that most students and faculty do not live on campus, despite the close-knit community claim, resulting in a 45-minute average commute. This information would have helped them better understand the dynamics and lifestyle of the institution they were considering.
Most students don't live on campus. Neither do faculty. Even though they all say it's a close-knit community, the fact is, they all commute 45 minutes on average each way.
Applicants commonly mentioned disruptions due to weather, positive interactions with enthusiastic faculty, and concerns about the distance of living arrangements from campus. They appreciate the program but are hesitant about the location aspects.
Due to the snow, everything got thrown off. The faculty I met were enthusiastic and the students I spoke to by phone/email seemed content with their program but the fact that people live so far from campus isn't appealing to me.