SDN Logo
 
 

University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Farmington, CT

Dental Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 21% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
7.7
Good

Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.

Based on 400 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools revolve around the motivation to pursue dentistry, experiences in shadowing and research, academic performance, future goals in dentistry, and preparation for standardized tests like the DAT. Some respondents mentioned being asked about specific dental procedures, their choice of dentistry over other health fields, and where they see themselves professionally in the future. Additionally, references to MMI format and nondisclosure agreements suggest that some interviews were structured in an MMI format with restrictions on discussing specific questions.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting questions asked at University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine discussed a range of topics including career aspirations, shadowing experiences, future practice plans, personal hobbies, academic background, ethical dilemmas in dentistry, and views on the healthcare system. The interviews may have been in an MMI format as multiple respondents mentioned nondisclosure agreements, but the questions primarily focused on personal experiences, professional goals, and opinions related to dentistry and healthcare.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine discussed a wide range of topics including why they applied to multiple schools, details about shadowing experiences, ethical scenarios, and their views on dentistry. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) due to the diverse questions asked, and some respondents mentioned experiencing a good cop/bad cop routine, potentially indicating a nondisclosure agreement in place.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing common questions on SDN, practicing responses, and seeking feedback from current students or alumni. They also researched the school's website, read over their application materials, and engaged in mock interviews to feel more confident and prepared.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were positively impressed by the friendly and supportive environment, small class sizes, pass/fail grading system, high specialization rates, rigorous curriculum, faculty-student interactions, state-of-the-art facilities, integration with medical students, and the emphasis on clinical experience. They also appreciated the emphasis on competency, the location, the reputation, the immersive learning experiences, the focus on research and volunteer opportunities, and the affordability of the program.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants were commonly unimpressed by the lack of warmth and professionalism during interviews, feeling unengaged and unenthusiastic about the school. They also noted concerns about outdated facilities, the stress level of students, and the emphasis on board scores rather than a more comprehensive view of the program. Suggestions included improving interview experiences, updating facilities, and showcasing a more holistic view of the school beyond academic achievements.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the conversational and relaxed nature of the interview, as well as the potential for good cop/bad cop scenarios. Suggestions included being prepared for stand-offish interviewers, timing of virtual interviews, and the lengthy orientation session. It was also noted that in-state residency can be claimed after the first year, and to be aware of the remote location and lack of nearby amenities.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally provided positive feedback about UCONN's curriculum, facilities, faculty, and opportunities for specialization, but some expressed concerns about interviewers' attitudes and the demanding nature of the program. Suggestions included being well-prepared for the interview, remaining confident in responses, and being honest about weaknesses in the application.
  • Seems like a great school for those who are set on specializing!
  • My interview was horrible! The interviewer blamed me for something in my application that was clearly there error. I still sent a thank you and an apology and no one responded. UCONN definitely going a few spaces down on my list. Doing this process is hard enough thereโ€™s no need to be rude.
  • great school
  • Students seemed to love it there.
  • Seems like a really great program. Love the way the curriculum is set up, especially as someone who is interested in OMFS (lines up well with the CBSE). I probably got a couple bad egg interviewers but it does leave a sour taste in your mouth regardless. I just hope those faculty members don't represent the majority of faculty at UCONN. I can't imagine they'd be great student mentors....

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested re-evaluating interviewers, considering in-person interviews for facility viewings, providing digital information packages, and improving transportation guidance, while also commending the office's organization and helpfulness.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Bradley International Airport (BDL)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel among the responses is Marriott.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor Virtual
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2024-25 N/A Good Virtual
2022-23 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ N/A Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2012-13 N/A Average N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A