SDN Logo
 
 

University of Kentucky School of Dentistry Interview Feedback Summary

Lexington, KY

Dental Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 21% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.3
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 189 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools revolve around the candidate's motivation for pursuing dentistry, their unique qualities, academic performance including grades and standardized test scores, experiences related to dentistry, and their ability to overcome challenges. Some respondents mentioned an MMI format, suggesting potential nondisclosure agreements in place during their interviews.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Kentucky School of Dentistry discussed a variety of topics such as experiences with diversity, favorite dental procedures, values contributing to diversity, patient scenarios, and personal attributes for success in dentistry. Based on the responses provided, it appears that the interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview), with some respondents mentioning specific follow-up questions and personal inquiries, which could indicate a nondisclosure agreement in place for the interview process.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Kentucky School of Dentistry discussed a variety of topics such as personal challenges overcome, uniqueness, motivation for dentistry, and academic performance. The interviews were generally straightforward, with no mention of an MMI format or nondisclosure agreements.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing their application, practicing common interview questions, and conducting research on the school through resources like Student Doctor Network (SDN) and the school's website. Some also sought advice from current students, engaged in mock interviews, and rehearsed their answers either through self-reflection or by recording themselves.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and welcoming atmosphere of both the staff and students. They highlighted the small class sizes, personalized attention, and enthusiasm shown by the faculty and admissions staff as major positives. Many also appreciated the emphasis on community engagement and service opportunities provided by the school.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the lack of diversity in the program, the age and condition of the school facilities, the limited patient pool for practical experience, and some negative interactions during the admissions process. Suggestions included improving diversity initiatives, updating facilities, expanding patient exposure, and refining the admissions process to provide a more positive experience for applicants.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the relaxed and conversational nature of the interview, the long and tiring day, and the importance of being prepared for lots of walking. Additionally, some applicants mentioned the need for comfortable shoes for the tour and the unpredictability of the interview schedule throughout the day.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally expressed positive feedback about the school, including its welcoming environment, friendly staff, and strong faculty. They appreciated the informative interviews, relaxed atmosphere, and engaging activities throughout the visit, making the school a top choice for many.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants overwhelmingly praised the admissions office for their kindness, approachability, and responsiveness, with a common suggestion being to further reduce paperwork and move towards a fully paper-free application process.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel among the responses is "University Inn".

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

The most comments on where they stayed would be the "great hotel with all amenities" as it provides more positive feedback compared to the other response.

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2016-17 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Great N/A
2011-12 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A