SDN Logo
 
 

University of Louisville School of Dentistry Interview Feedback Summary

Louisville, KY

Dental Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 26% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.2
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 451 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include scenarios about handling difficult situations with colleagues, ethical dilemmas in the field, personal strengths and weaknesses, experiences in volunteer work, motivations for pursuing dentistry, and future career goals. Additionally, respondents mentioned questions about their extracurricular activities, family background, and reasons for choosing a specific school, with some interviews possibly being part of an MMI format and subject to a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Louisville School of Dentistry discussed a wide range of topics including time management, ethics, alternative professions, dealing with adversity, favorite dental procedures, underprivileged dental care, superheroes, family background, and personal interests. The interviews appeared to be a mix of standard questions and some unique ones, with no specific trend towards a particular type of inquiry.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Louisville School of Dentistry discussed various topics such as ethical dilemmas in dentistry, handling criticism, personal failures, accomplishments, and motivations for pursuing dentistry. Additionally, the interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) with possible non-disclosure agreements, as some responses alluded to nondisclosure of specific questions or scenarios.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing the school's website, practicing common interview questions, and utilizing resources like Student Doctor Network (SDN). They also engaged in mock interviews, researched the program, and relaxed before the interview to alleviate anxiety.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and welcoming atmosphere of the faculty, staff, and students, as well as the focus on creating a supportive and collaborative learning environment. They also appreciated the state-of-the-art facilities, the emphasis on clinical experience, and the transparency in providing thorough information about the school and its programs.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the older facilities, lack of modern equipment, high out-of-state tuition, lengthy presentations, location, and unfavorable weather conditions. Suggestions included addressing the facility renovations promptly, providing clearer information on tuition costs, streamlining the interview process, and improving the overall organization and presentation flow on interview days.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the varying interview styles, the number of interviewees present, the conversational nature of the interviews, the need for questions unrelated to financial aid or general information, the long duration of the interview day, and the laid-back atmosphere of the process. They also highlighted the importance of relaxation, preparation of fun facts, and being patient with the school's communication timeline.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the University of Louisville School of Dentistry to be a welcoming and diverse program with a relaxed and friendly interview process. Most appreciated the emphasis on getting to know applicants personally, but some expressed concerns about facilities and the length of the interview day.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants appreciate the friendly and responsive nature of the admissions office, with positive feedback on the interview process and staff interactions. Some suggest shorter and more organized presentations, a greater variety of lunch options, and possibly reducing the number of PowerPoint presentations during the admissions process.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by airplane to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent between $301 and $400.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel is Quality Inn, with multiple variations such as Quality Inn & Suites, Quality Inn Airport, and Quality Inn University/Airport.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

Nulu

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Poor In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2021-22 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good In Person
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 N/A Average N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A