SDN Logo
 
 

Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Pullman, WA

Veterinary Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 23% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.0
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 221 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about stress management, areas for improvement, handling mistakes, contributions to the institution, financial planning for school, ethical dilemmas, personal accomplishments, and motivations for pursuing a career in veterinary medicine. Some respondents also encountered MMI-format interviews with questions on compassion fatigue, integrity, leadership, academic rigor, and societal roles of veterinarians. Note that some respondents may have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement during their interviews.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting question asked at Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including ethical dilemmas, future career aspirations, pet treatment scenarios, and personal attributes like leadership and communication skills. Some responses indicated a focus on the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format, suggesting that respondents may have been under a non-disclosure agreement regarding specific questions asked during the interview process.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed various ethical scenarios, including handling client requests to lie, admitting mistakes, and dealing with difficult situations like genetic defects in animals. Additionally, respondents mentioned questions about disease outbreaks, elective class choices, and the differences between animal welfare organizations, indicating a focus on ethical decision-making and situational judgment during the interviews.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by practicing with mock interviews, reviewing common interview questions from sources like SDN, researching current events and ethical issues in veterinary medicine, and reflecting on personal experiences to answer questions thoroughly and honestly. Advice to just be oneself and show passion and genuineness was also highlighted as valuable guidance for the interview.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and genuine interest displayed by the school's staff, students, and interviewers. They appreciated the welcoming atmosphere, the state-of-the-art facilities, the emphasis on collaboration rather than competition, and the opportunities for hands-on learning, all contributing to a positive and comfortable experience during their visit.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the outdated facilities, remote location, lack of diverse opportunities, and unenthusiastic atmosphere in Pullman. Suggestions included improving the facilities, enhancing diversity and culture, providing more engaging tours, and creating a more personalized interview experience.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known that interviews focus on personal qualities rather than achievements, to stay for mixers, and to wear a suit. They also highlighted the welcoming and stress-free nature of the interview process, the need to fly into Spokane instead of Pullman, and the availability of classes to sit in on early in the morning.

What are your general comments?

Applicants commonly praised the friendly and supportive atmosphere at WSU, with many highlighting the welcoming community and conversational interview style. Suggestions included being authentic, relaxed, and prepared for a conversational interview experience.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants suggest that the admissions office should provide more structured interview dates, clear prerequisites before the interview, offer advance information on classes and activities, and ensure a welcoming and informative environment for prospective students. They also recommend improving communication, digital systems, and tour options to enhance the overall application experience.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by airplane to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent more than $500.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel among the responses is the "Holiday Inn Express."

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

N/A

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2014-15 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2014-15 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A