SDN Logo
 
 

Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Dayton, OH

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 31% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.0
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 701 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about personal motivations for pursuing medicine, experiences that influenced the decision to become a doctor, challenges faced, leadership and community service experiences, and future goals in the field. Some respondents mentioned engaging in an MMI format where questions were conversational, while others highlighted a wide range of questions covering topics such as personal statements, academic background, and ethical scenarios.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting question asked at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including personal attributes, family influences, ethical dilemmas, and future aspirations. While the questions varied, some respondents mentioned being asked about their MCAT scores, research experiences, personal statements, and opinions on healthcare reform, with a few instances of non-traditional questions like hypothetical scenarios and qualities inherited from family members.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics such as personal challenges, motivations for becoming a doctor, leadership qualities, and future career goals. Additionally, the interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on some responses referencing nondisclosure agreements and unique scenarios presented during the interviews.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing their applications, researching the school through its website and SDN forum, doing mock interviews, and preparing responses to common interview questions. They also sought feedback from current students, reviewed ethical issues and current events in healthcare, and focused on articulating their motivations for pursuing medicine and interest in the specific program.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the genuine, down-to-earth nature of the interviewers and the welcoming, friendly atmosphere at Wright State University. The sense of community, support, and collaboration among students, faculty, and staff, along with the state-of-the-art facilities and focus on clinical experience, were highlighted as standout qualities that made a positive impression on applicants.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants were consistently unimpressed by the facilities, campus aesthetics, lack of integration with the city, limited technology, and the absence of a teaching hospital on campus. Suggestions included updating facilities, enhancing campus appeal, improving technology resources, and considering closer ties to healthcare institutions for clinical experiences.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly expressed a desire to have known ahead of time about the relaxed and laid-back nature of the interviews, the emphasis on personal experiences rather than generic questions, the specific interview format involving various types of interviewers, and the unique aspects of the school such as its focus on primary care and community-based approach. Many applicants also highlighted the importance of being prepared for the interview platform and logistics, as well as bringing necessary items like water and warm clothing for the campus visit.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interview experience at Wright State to be relaxed and conversational, with interviewers focused on getting to know them as individuals. Positive comments included appreciation for the friendly atmosphere, the supportive community, and the emphasis on fit with the school, while some expressed concerns about specific interviewers or aspects of the program.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Most applicants suggest improving communication methods, providing better technology demonstrations, ensuring interviewers are knowledgeable and courteous, and enhancing the overall interview experience by addressing logistical issues like parking during special events. Additionally, applicants appreciate personal touches and friendly interactions with the admissions staff.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Friends or family or with friends or family.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2019-20 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A