SDN Logo
 
 

Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Fort Smith, AR

Osteopathic Medical Schools | Private Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 27% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about influences, personal background, alignment with school mission, concerns about medical school, leadership experience, ethical dilemmas like cheating, study habits, clinical experience, and motivation for pursuing medicine, particularly osteopathic medicine. Some respondents mentioned questions related to the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format, indicating a structured interview style possibly involving a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting questions asked at Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine discussed various topics such as reasons for choosing osteopathic medicine, gap year activities, handling ethical dilemmas like cheating, community service involvement, personal hobbies, leadership experiences, and coping mechanisms for stress. The interviews may have been in an MMI format, as some responses indicated a closed-file setting and potential non-disclosure agreements, with a focus on getting to know the applicants on a deeper level through diverse situational inquiries.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine discussed a wide range of topics including personal strengths and weaknesses, ethical dilemmas like handling cheating, facing failures, and cultural competency. Some respondents mentioned MMI or Multiple Mini Interview format, indicating a structured interview with potentially non-disclosure agreements in place.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had a closed file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by utilizing resources such as SDN, mock interviews, researching the school and surrounding area, reviewing their application materials, and practicing common interview questions. They also sought advice from current students, spoke with friends who had previously interviewed at the school, and made sure to understand the school's mission and values.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and welcoming atmosphere of the staff, faculty, and students at the school. They also appreciated the state-of-the-art facilities, commitment to community service, and the personalized attention they received during the interview process. Some suggestions for improvement included enhancing the organization of the interview day and providing more details on the curriculum.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the lengthy presentations and interview day, high professor turnover rate, lack of student activities, limited nearby affordable shopping options, and being required to travel for interviews. Suggestions included improving engagement for virtual guests, providing more information on historical data, addressing technical difficulties promptly, and ensuring interviewer preparedness. It was also recommended to offer more campus visits, enhance campus safety, and establish a more established track record for the school.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Most applicants wished they had known ahead of time that the interview process would involve two people, that the interviews would be immediate upon arriving on campus, and that they should not stress as the interviewers are there to help. Suggestions included practicing interview skills, being prepared for unexpected writing prompts, and learning more about financial aid options.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally expressed positive impressions of the school, its staff, and the interview experience, highlighting the friendly atmosphere, faculty commitment, and community-oriented approach. Some feedback mentioned the need for quicker interview processes, technical improvements, and more organized scheduling, but overall, applicants were enthusiastic about the school and its potential for producing excellent doctors.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants generally praised the admissions office for being personable, accommodating, and transparent, suggesting that they continue their strong work. Some feedback included providing refreshments, updating websites for user-friendliness, allowing for more student interaction, and incorporating more breaks during the admissions process.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by Admissions staff personnel

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 7+ hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent between $101 and $200.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

1. Home 2. N/A 3. Air conditioner loud, cookies and hot chocolate available 4. Discount for interviewing, $89 a night, breakfast, shuttle, clean 5. Discount for interviewing, Hampton Inn, nice, great continental breakfast Based on the responses, it seems that the user stayed at the Hampton Inn due to the discounted price for interviewing and the positive comments about the hotel.

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A