Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.
Based on 66 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include designing a research project, explaining research background and its connection to career goals, articulating reasons for program selection, and discussing aspirations post-degree completion. While respondents did not mention an MMI format or nondisclosure agreements, these questions are indicative of the types of inquiries typically encountered in medical school interviews.
Design a research project (this was asked in a group format and we just gave general answers, she didn't ask us to provide possible statistical analyses or anything)
Students said the most interesting question asked at Adelphi University Gordon F. Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies discussed designing a research project, stress relief strategies, reasons for interest in clinical psychology, and favorite movies. The interview format may have been MMI, as some responses hint at nondisclosure agreements, with a mix of standard and conversational questions observed.
Nothing really, the above 3 were pretty much the only questions I was asked. The rest of the time was more like a conversation and me asking questions.
Students said most difficult question asked at Adelphi University Gordon F. Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies discussed designing a research project, reasons for choosing the university, and other places applied to. The responses did not indicate an MMI format or issues related to nondisclosure agreements.
Design a research project :) (this actually wasn't that difficult for me, I love research, but it was difficult for some)
when they asked why I chose ASU I said that I thought they did amazing empirically based interventions... Then they asked if other places didn't do empirically based interventions...Not too bad for the most difficult question
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants mostly prepared for the interview by reading research papers and abstracts related to their field of study, familiarizing themselves with the program and potential interview questions, and seeking insights from current students or attending relevant classes. Many also focused on understanding the work of their potential advisor and honing their own research interests.
Built up a CV with a good deal of clinical and research experience over the past few years.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the positive atmosphere and supportive environment of the program, including the friendly and collaborative interactions among faculty and students, the quality of work being produced, and the openness to discussing weaknesses. They also highlighted the beautiful facilities, state-of-the-art resources, and the successful internship and externship placements, creating an overall positive experience during the interview process.
Most unique and challenging interview I've been on. Fascinating. Beautiful facilities.
The building is amazing, the professors seemed happy, and the students were all really friendly with us and with each other... I could tell that they got a lot done in part because they all get along!
The location, the current graduate students, the quality of work being produced, the apparent absence of stress among faculty and students, their openness to discussing weaknesses (though there aren't many and most don't even apply to me), their 100% match rate over the past seven or so years, etc.
The graduate students and faculty seemed to all get along well. They created a very supportive atmosphere and were very honest about the strengths and weaknesses of the program.
EVERYTHING! The faculty was very welcoming and open, the facilities were brand new and state of the art, the internship placements over the past few years were excellent, the new curriculum, externship placements
The students I had a chance to interact with seemed happy and had positive things to say about the program (this was in the hall, bathroom, etc. so they were not actually part of the interview day).
Applicants commonly expressed frustration at the lack of feedback on their performance and desired more interaction with faculty and current students. Suggestions included providing clearer post-interview communication and enhancing opportunities for engagement with the program community.
There wasn't much opportunity to meet faculty and current students but we were told some of us would be invited back for an open house to learn more about the program.
Applicants commonly wished they had known about the level of informality during the interview, the importance of researching multiple professors, and the need for comfortable footwear for a walking tour. Additionally, some mentioned specific local tips like bringing earplugs and visiting a notable bar in the area.
How laid back this interview would be (especially compared to my other interviews)
I wish I had researched other professors more. Once I arrived, I realized a different professor from the one I researched would be a better mentor/advisor for me.
Applicants generally found the programs they interviewed for to be interesting and enjoyable, particularly appreciating interactions with current students. Some applicants highlighted unique interview formats, while others expressed uncertainty about their performance post-interview.
Adelphi has a unique interview format. There were people in my group and we met with a faculty member and a 4th year student. The only instruction we were given to to introduce ourselves, otherwise we all just talked for approx. 2 hours (had 1 break). At the end we met with 2 first year students for cookies and to answer any questions. Surprisingly, it was a pretty good experience and I enjoyed my groupmates. However, it is really tough to judge your own performance and I left feeling like I had no idea how I did.