Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions ▼
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
Most commonly, interviewees were asked about their interest in the program, expectations, desired information about the institution, reasons for choosing it, anticipated strengths and weaknesses in grad school, and their hobbies. These questions reflect a focus on the applicant's motivations, goals, self-awareness, and personal interests in the context of the program.
Students said most interesting question asked at California Institute of Integral Studies discussed work history and aspirations in the field, including a question about dreams for the future.
Students said the most difficult question asked at California Institute of Integral Studies discussed why they chose to come to CIIS, with other questions being fairly standard.
Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What are your comments on where you stayed?
No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions ▼
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was unfriendly.
No responses
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was unresponsive.
No responses
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by conducting internet research about the program and the school, reading interview feedback from similar programs, and preparing questions to ask the interviewers. This approach helped them gain insights into the school, its interview format, and demonstrate their interest and preparedness during the interview.
Read this site, checked interview feedback of Pharmacy schools that had group interview formats (b/c psych didnt have interview feedback yet), read up on the school, prepared questions to ask the interviewers.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the warm, friendly, and approachable faculty, staff, and students, who created a welcoming and open environment. They appreciated the ample opportunities to engage with faculty members and students, both before and after the interview, which allowed for meaningful interactions and insights into the community.
Very warm and friendly faculty, staff, and students. Very open and casual. Easy going.
Applicants were commonly unimpressed by the location and facilities, and by interviewers displaying disinterest or unprofessional behavior during the interview. Suggestions include ensuring all interviewers are engaged and maintaining a professional demeanor throughout the interview process.
Many applicants expressed a desire to have known ahead of time that the East/West spiritual element is not a significant component of the Psy.D. program compared to other programs at the school. They recommended researching the specific program's focus and curriculum to align expectations with the actual content.
The East/West spriritual element is more pronounced in other programs at the school. It's not really a big part of the Psy.D. program.
Applicants generally provided positive feedback about their interview experience, noting improvements in their initial impressions and feeling that they conducted themselves well. However, some expressed challenges with group dynamics in the interview setting, suggesting variations in interviewer approaches and the need for more consideration of group interactions during the process.
Very positive. It turned a somewhat dubious impression into a solid positive.
It was interesting. I think one of the most difficult things was just that it was in a group setting. This is very hard to handle when there is a person in your group who completely dominates the conversation and is extremely long-winded. The school didn't seem interested in how we interacted as a group, and it was very much a structured interview. Though, I should mention, the other interview group during my time said their session was completely relaxed and like a conversation, so I guess it depends on who you get for your interviewers. Anyway, I must have handled it well enough because they called me the next day to let me know that I got in!