Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.
Based on 49 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the motivation to pursue the profession, career aspirations post-graduation, specific interests within the field, reasons for choosing the particular school, handling conflicts, and detailing work experience. Some respondents mentioned being under an MMI format with a nondisclosure agreement, restricting the disclosure of specific questions asked during the interview process.
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Guelph Ontario Veterinary College discussed scenarios such as visiting a slaughter facility, cultural attitudes towards eating dogs, conflict resolution with others, and summer reading materials. These questions suggest a focus on ethical considerations, interpersonal skills, and personal interests during the interview process.
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Guelph Ontario Veterinary College discussed various topics including reasons for applying to the school, ethical beliefs, case details recall, licensing requirements for graduates, and stress management techniques.
Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by participating in mock interviews, conducting online research on various topics, practicing with sample questions, and seeking advice from colleagues or admissions departments. They emphasized the importance of being well-versed in their background information, vaccination schedules, animal behavior, common procedures, ethical issues, and current affairs related to the field.
Mock MMI by the Future Vets Club, online research (current affairs, etc.)
I made sure that I could back up everything that I wrote on my back ground information forms. I studied all of the basics vaccination schedules (large and small animal), restraint, animal behaviour, breeds, and any common procedures performed in clinics. Also, I made sure that I was aware of all of the ethical issues surrounding the use of animal and any current affairs related to the field.
Applicants were positively impressed by the friendliness and genuine interest shown by interviewers, as well as the welcoming and courteous atmosphere. The personalized approach, including having the application printed during the interview and the interactions with alumni and staff, left a strong positive impression on many applicants.
all the alumni and profs involved with interviews, degree of thought put into mmi scenarios
That they had my application printed and in front of them during the interview and were genuinely interested in hearing more about my experiences. Elizabeth Lowenger, the diversity and career coordinator at the dean's office met with me and my dad while we were waiting beforehand to give me more info about the school, clubs, and other students. She was so nice and friendly and I enjoyed talking to her so much before the interview that I didn't have a chance to get nervous at all.
Applicants commonly expressed frustration with lack of preparedness, unorganized processes, short notice for interviews causing travel difficulties, and delays in communication from the admissions office. Suggestions included improving organization, providing more notice for interviews, and enhancing communication efficiency.
They were not prepared. I didn't get to meet with professors or many students. It was not organized. No free parking for visitors.
The only thing I didn't like was that I was given less than 1 week's notice for the interview. Also, the admissions office was so behind that I didn't hear back about the interview until early May, frustratingly later than any of the U.S. schools.
Many applicants wished they had known about specific differences in the application process, such as the interview format for international students. Overall, the majority felt well-prepared and did not have any major regrets or wishes for prior knowledge.
I was not aware that international students were not interviewed in the MMI format, which I had been preparing for instead!
Applicants commonly mentioned the lack of clarity regarding the interview process for international students and suggested providing more specific information. Additionally, positive feedback was shared about the overall interview experience and the types of questions asked during the process.
The webpage that discusses the interview process does NOT mention that international students are interviewed differently. I thought it would be MMI, but it consisted of more general questions about my experiences and myself.
I interviewed as an international student, so my interview was like most with two interviewers. Ontarians go through a Multiple Mini Interview process which uses eight standardized scenarios and should be prepared for differently.
Overall my experience was positive. I have two females interviewing me. Some of the questions they asked me were as follows: How do you feel about the use of animals in research?, What was the most interesting thing that you saw while volunteering?, describe some of the books that you read this summer?, How can you tell if an animal is stressed? Why do you think that you will make a good vet? , How do you deal with stress?, What hours do large animal vets work? What are the responsibiliites of the large animal vet?
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should address significant time delays during holidays and expedite course approval processes, while also improving response times to emails, particularly avoiding responses near the end of the workday.
There are significant time delays around the holidays (applications due Jan 1) and course approvals can take months.