Most respondents were neutral about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they had average performance at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school as average compared to other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions ▼
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the motivation behind pursuing the degree, theoretical orientation, reasons for choosing the specific school, readiness for the program, personal background, and interest in the institution. Some respondents mentioned a conversational format where they discussed their interests and inquired about professors, while others were asked about their reasons for selecting the school and their self-introduction.
Students said most interesting question asked at George Washington University Columbian College of Arts & Sciences discussed experiences in clinical settings and significant patient interactions.
Students said most difficult question asked at George Washington University Columbian College of Arts & Sciences discussed personal impact on career choice, family history, and personal challenges faced.
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What are your comments on where you stayed?
No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions ▼
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by conducting research on the organization or program, reviewing their application materials, and practicing with mock interviews. They also emphasized the importance of familiarizing themselves with the program's mission, professors' research, and publications.
Visiting their website, reviewing my application, looking at The Insider's Guide, practicing.
Applicants were positively impressed by the positive atmosphere and vibe of the program and university, as well as the enthusiasm of both students and faculty. The sense of community, friendliness, and balance between research and clinical aspects were highlighted as strong points.
The vibe. Also George Washington University and DC are great places to be.
Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions about the department's facilities and lack of amenities like coffee, the strict psychodynamic training model, the inconvenience of interviewing professors not being on campus, and interviewers appearing disinterested. Suggestions included improving facilities, offering more modern training approaches, ensuring faculty availability for in-person interviews, and ensuring interviewers are engaged and attentive.
The facilities: the department is housed in the basement. Also they did not have coffee available during the "refreshment" part of the day! WTF?
One of the professors was not on campus on the day I interviewed, so I had to speak with her over the phone. I would have much preferred to speak with her in person.
Applicants commonly wished they had known about the significant increase in workload between 1st and 2nd year, as well as the requirement for a phone interview.
Students said your workload increases ten-fold from 1st year to 2nd year.
Applicants generally found the program to have potential for growth, with some finding it exciting. They appreciated the welcoming environment created by faculty and grad students, although some had mixed experiences during interviews due to varying interviewer behaviors and external factors like weather affecting schedules.
The program has a lot of growing to do, which may be exciting for some.
My first interview was a very positive experience. The person was very friendly, talkative, and sociable. I never felt like I was put on the spot or being judged/analyzed. My second interview was a more negative experience. The interviewer's eyes were half-closed the majority of the interview. He was more cold and only asked me three or four questions, leaving the other twenty minutes for me to ask questions, which felt like too much time to fill. I didn't feel like I was being psychoanalyzed, but I also didn't feel like he cared about me at all.
great, bad weather so some faculty were late/couldn't make it at all (had to do phone interviews on site) but that all can't really be helped...it was really laid back and relaxed, even despite the hectic-ness!
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Many applicants suggested that the admissions office should improve the quality and engagement of their interviews to make them more meaningful and impactful for prospective students.