Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 31% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about reasons for choosing a specific school, motivations for pursuing medicine, academic performance explanations, ethical dilemmas faced, and personal attributes that make applicants suitable for the program. Some respondents mentioned questions about past academic challenges, ethical dilemmas, and personal achievements, while others may have been subject to an MMI format and nondisclosure agreements.
Why Hofstra? Why do you want to live here? ("I thought everyone from California wanted to stay in California")
Students said the most interesting question asked at Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell discussed a range of topics, including personal experiences, motivations for attending Hofstra, ethical dilemmas, future aspirations, and challenges with the curriculum. These questions provide insight into the applicants' character, decision-making skills, values, and adaptability, reflecting the holistic approach of the interview process.
Students said the most difficult question asked at Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell discussed ethical scenarios in an MMI format, along with questions about handling conflicts, decision-making under pressure, project worthiness, leadership experiences, and personal challenges. Respondents may have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement due to the nature of the interview format.
Most respondents had an interview of 30 - 40 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for interviews by researching the school through its website and SDN, practicing with mock interviews, reviewing their application thoroughly, and preparing answers for common interview questions. Additionally, some applicants engaged in mock MMIs, spoke with current students or professionals, and studied current healthcare topics relevant to the school.
I read over my application more than a few times and really made sure that I could speak at great length about anything an interviewer could ask me about. Additionally, I researched the school quite extensively, read the student manual, and spent an hour chatting with an MS4 over the phone.
Applicants were consistently impressed by the modern facilities, innovative curriculum, and ample clinical exposure offered by the school. They also appreciated the responsiveness of the administration to student feedback, the supportive school culture, and the dedication of the faculty and staff.
The passion about the unique curriculum. The amount of clinical exposure. The Step 1 performance. The responsiveness of the administration to student feedback. The diversity of the patients because serves Queens.
Everyone I met at Hofstra, from faculty to students, truly loved the school. The curriculum is modern, impressive, and well thought out. You get clinical exposure starting week 1, and (what I love best) much of your learning is self-guided and in teams. Look up the PEARLS curriculum, and you can't but help be impressed. The ratio of faculty to students is ~5:1. That's a top tier ratio, and this school is looking to be an academic & clinical powerhouse in the next 10 years. They are a rising school, and, from the students that I met that they have recruited, they clearly are on the rise. On a final note, their student lounge was on point... and only students (and not faculty) have access, so it's a truly safe space to just hang.
The curriculum seems very innovative. All of the students were very happy to be there. The program seems to be a huge success re: board scores, medical community response to the students during residency applications.
Administration is very open and the curriculum has a lot of early patient exposure. Also, light breakfast was provided, which is always appreciated and doesn't happen at all schools.
The new curriculum sounds very well thought out and unique. I liked the EMT training to start off with and the lots of early clinical experince. The school is brand new and beautiful. The faculty seemed really dedicated to making Hofstra a great school.
Very new and nice facilities. Students get ALOT of resources compared to other schools. Faculty and staff are very straightforward and clearly care about developing and excellent curriculum and atmosphere for their students.Many students chose Hofstra over other equally or better "standing" schools.
Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the lack of clear feedback and assessments, the distant location from amenities, the negative social mission perception, the unstructured curriculum, and the interview process being uncomfortable. Suggestions included providing more structured feedback, improving the curriculum organization, addressing the negative social mission perception, and ensuring a more comfortable interview experience for applicants.
The location (!!). Students described not always feeling like they knew how well they are doing in courses and wish there was more feedback (there are very few assessments). The way that everything is a drive away. The sense that the school wasn't very motivated by a social mission/serving the underserved (staffs uses terms like "illegal immigrants" instead of "undocumented," ect) which was surprising because they brag about learning from the diverse population of Queens.
The students mentioned that the neighborhood is kind of a dead zone for nightlife. That being said, you're a half hour away from the beach. I would trade a day at the beach for a hundred nights in a club.
I had 2 interviews - a "good cop, bad cop". I was asked where else I was interviewing, which I found distasteful. My "bad cop" interviewer made some inappropriate comments relating to something in my personal statement. I also did not like that they had someone from the admissions office come with the group on our tour. The med student who was giving the tour could not be honest with someone from admissions standing right there the whole time. I disliked that students do not have a true anatomy lab experience. Med students do not get to do dissections, instructors dissect everything for you.
Students seemed nervous about the way medicine is taught (very little formal schooling, a lot of self-directed learning). There is a requirement to have a car here, administration made that very clear and not everyone may be enthusiastic about that. Also, admissions gave the illusion that most people would hear back in March when the reality is that accepted people will hear before then and only waitlist and rejected applicants will hear back in March (true, that IS the majority, but applicants were told that not getting an immediate acceptance didn't mean no acceptance at all, which wasn't the case).
It is a new school, so the students are like Guinea pigs, extra curricular activities are not fully developed, and everything else that comes along with a new school
Applicants commonly wished they had known about the timing of the MMI, the importance of arriving early, the potential for curveball questions, the nature of the interview format, the significance of the simulation center visit, and details about the curriculum. Many also recommended being prepared for unexpected questions, bringing a book, and familiarizing oneself with interviewers, the weather, and special videos shown during the interview.
The MMI is right in the beginning which was very nice
I wish the the special video they should us during the interview was available on their youtube channel. It made me tear up. It was fantastically done.
The interviews were right after the dean's talk. Maybe it was just my interview experience but it seemed like a good cop, bad cop situation. Also, your interviewer can go past the time allotted (of course my "bad cop" was the one who grilled me way past the time). Mine went way over and once I got back to the group they were in the middle of the next presentation.
Applicants generally expressed enthusiasm for Hofstra's unique curriculum and student body, highlighting a positive interview experience and a strong desire to be part of the school. Some concerns were raised about the location and uncertainties regarding the future, but overall, applicants felt positive about the school's investment in student success and innovative approach to education.
I really liked the idea of the school (clinical experience, unique curriculum, normal-seeming students) but was very disappointed by the location
Super positive experience here. Hofstra definitely seems like a school invested to their students' success and their curriculum approach is definitely very unqiue!
Lots of questions up in the air for the students about their future at such a new place but overall it seems like administration cares about their success.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office provide more information about student programs and student happiness, be transparent and responsive in communication, and avoid creating false expectations about the timeline for hearing back post-interview.
I wish I could have learned more about student programs. I think they spent a lot of time diving into the minutia of the curriculum but I wanted to learn more about what it was like to live in the area and student happiness. I was disappointed by the sense that the school was not very interested in the mission of serving the underserved/social justice ("we aren't here to solve the primary care crisis")
Don't imply that we can email and you want to be as open as possible about the process and where we are ranked and then give vague responses when we email you. Don't do the good cop/bad cop interview
Don't give the illusion that most people will hear back in March when the reality is that accepted people will hear before then and only waitlist and rejected applicants will hear back in March (true, that is the majority, but applicants were told that not getting an immediate acceptance didn't mean no acceptance at all, which wasn't the case).