SDN Logo
 
 

Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Huntington, WV

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 28% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the candidate's motivation for pursuing medicine, their academic journey, strengths and weaknesses, relevant experiences such as research and volunteer work, as well as their ability to handle challenges and stressful situations. Some responses also mentioned questions about specific classes taken, recent books read, and future plans if not accepted to medical school this year. Additionally, references to personal background, cultural understanding, and resilience in overcoming obstacles were noted in the responses, which may have been part of an MMI format where respondents might have been under a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics from meaningful experiences to ethical dilemmas, personal interests, and unique hypothetical scenarios. While some responses mentioned specific questions like meeting influential figures or dealing with unexpected exam results, the variety of inquiries suggests a holistic approach to assessing candidates' experiences, values, and problem-solving skills during the interview process.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including managing academic challenges, personal weaknesses, views on healthcare, and reasons for choosing the school. Some respondents mentioned an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements, while others found open-ended questions like "Tell me about yourself" and "Why this grade in organic chemistry?" particularly challenging.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by engaging in mock interviews, reviewing their applications, reading through Student Doctor Network (SDN), and studying common interview questions. They also utilized resources like the school's website and sought advice from current students or friends who had gone through the process. Many applicants emphasized the importance of practicing out loud, staying informed about current issues, and seeking feedback from others to improve their interview performance.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness, warmth, and kindness of the interviewers, faculty, and staff. They appreciated the supportive and collaborative atmosphere, small class sizes, and the genuine interest shown in their success. Suggestions included maintaining this positive and welcoming environment, continuing to prioritize individual attention, and focusing on the personal connection with applicants throughout the admissions process.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed disappointment regarding the lack of organized tours, limited interaction with current students, and the overall size and location of the campus or city. Suggestions included providing more comprehensive tours, incorporating student perspectives, and addressing any disorganization in the interview process to offer a more informative and engaging experience for prospective students.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the relaxed and conversational nature of the interviews, the importance of being more relaxed and prepared with questions for the interviewers, and the need to arrive early to navigate the location and ensure a smooth interview experience. Additionally, some applicants mentioned the separate locations for classes and admissions offices, the unique aspects of the school, and the interview process involving multiple committee members.

What are your general comments?

Applicants commonly found the interview experience at Marshall University to be relaxed, conversational, and welcoming, with friendly and supportive interviewers. Many appreciated the low-pressure environment and the personal attention from staff, while also mentioning the desire for more information about the school and a more thorough interview process.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants overwhelmingly praised the admissions office for being amazing, friendly, and providing a positive experience. A common suggestion was to provide a little orientation before the interview to enhance the overall process for applicants.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by Admissions staff personnel

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Yeager Airport (CRW)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Poor N/A