SDN Logo
 
 

Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Miss. State, MS

Veterinary Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 29% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a low stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about financial planning, personal contributions to the school and profession, debt expectations, community issues in the field, teamwork abilities, stress management, ethical dilemmas, career aspirations post-graduation, reasons for pursuing veterinary medicine, and specific veterinary scenarios. Some respondents mentioned questions tailored to their experiences, research background, and ethical decision-making, while others were asked about holistic medicine, zoonotic diseases, and challenging veterinary situations.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting questions asked at Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including favorite wildlife animals, the impact of COVID-19 on veterinary medicine, qualities of a great veterinarian, resolving conflicts, and personal experiences influencing the decision to pursue veterinary medicine. The interviews may have been in an MMI format, as some responses mentioned tailored questions specific to individual applications, while others touched on topics like nondisclosure agreements and unique scenarios like handling difficult decisions and addressing injured wildlife patients without funding.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including personal accomplishments, the role of humans in veterinary medicine, leadership qualities, animal welfare vs. animal rights, and ethical considerations in the profession. Several responses referenced scenarios related to veterinary experiences, goal-setting, and ethical dilemmas, indicating a diverse mix of challenging questions that test candidates' critical thinking and ethical reasoning skills.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a in a group interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing their applications, practicing with questions from Student Doctor Network (SDN), seeking advice from mentors or current students, and doing mock interviews. Many also researched common interview questions, discussed with peers, and focused on being confident in what they wrote in their application.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were impressed by the friendliness and welcoming atmosphere of the faculty, staff, and students at the school, as well as the detailed organization of the interview process and informative orientation sessions. Many highlighted the emphasis on mentorship, hands-on experience, and the supportive environment that made them feel valued and well-prepared for their potential studies at the institution.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative feedback about issues such as lack of communication or organization from mentors and admissions staff, unprepared interviewers, limited tour visibility, and concerns about the dress code or technology. Suggestions included improving communication with applicants, enhancing interview preparation, providing more informative tours, and addressing concerns about the dress code and technology to create a more positive experience for potential students.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known that the interview process was very conversational and not stressful, with friendly interviewers. Additionally, many applicants suggested being prepared for potential downtime between activities and interviews, as well as being aware of the professional dress code and the need to plan ahead for logistics like interview times, accommodation, and transportation.

What are your general comments?

Applicants commonly mentioned that the interviews were conversational and low-stress, with friendly interviewers. Some expressed concerns about the school's communication, technology resources, and the town of Starkville, while others praised the genuine hospitality and curriculum fit at Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should provide more detailed and updated statistics about accepted applicants, improve email response times, and assign mentors earlier in the process. They also appreciated the friendliness and efficiency of the admissions staff.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 7+ hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent more than $500.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

Based on the responses provided, it is not clear where the users stayed. Therefore, the most comments on where they stayed cannot be determined.

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2023-24 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2011-12 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2011-12 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average N/A
2011-12 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A