SDN Logo
 
 

Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine

Miss. State, MS

Veterinary Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 29% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview mixed with a low stress level, and felt they did okay.
⭐ Overall Impressions

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about financial planning for education, reasons for choosing veterinary medicine over human medicine, experiences with ethical dilemmas, contributions to the profession, challenges in the field, personal characteristics distinguishing applicants, future career plans, research background, stress management, leadership skills, and ethical issues in veterinary practice. Additionally, respondents mentioned questions related to MMI format, non-disclosure agreements, specific veterinary scenarios, zoonotic diseases, handling conflicts, and the importance of confidentiality in veterinary medicine.

What was the most interesting question?

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including personal accomplishments, human interactions in veterinary medicine, leadership qualities, ethical dilemmas in the industry, and the role of veterinarians in the community. Some responses hinted at the interview being in an MMI format, potentially involving non-disclosure agreements, as certain questions were not specifically disclosed.
🤝 Interview Format and Logistics

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a in a group interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
📍 On-Site Experience

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents rank the facilities as below average.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 7+ hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent more than $500.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

What are your comments on where you stayed?

✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing their applications, practicing questions from Student Doctor Network (SDN), seeking advice from mentors or current students, and discussing potential questions with coworkers or friends. They emphasized the importance of being familiar with their application details and being ready to answer a variety of questions beyond just what was on their application.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the welcoming and friendly atmosphere, the personalized attention from faculty and staff, the organized and informative interview process, the mentorship program, and the emphasis on hands-on experience early in the program. Many highlighted the sense of community, the supportive faculty, and the detailed orientation provided, making them feel valued and well-prepared for their potential journey at the school.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about lack of communication with mentors, unprepared interviewers, uninformative tours, and issues with the dress code. Suggestions include improving mentorship programs, ensuring interviewers are well-prepared, enhancing tour experiences, and reevaluating the dress code policies to create a more positive impression on applicants.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known that the interview would be more relaxed and conversational, not stressful. They also suggested being prepared for potential downtime between scheduled activities, such as the interview time being assigned on the same day, and being aware of a professional dress code.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally commented on the relaxed and conversational nature of the interview process, the school's efforts to communicate with applicants, the lack of diversity on some interview days, the importance of asking questions during the interview, and the quality of the program at Mississippi State University. Some applicants mentioned concerns about technology and resources, communication issues, and the town of Starkville.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should improve response times to emails and provide more updated and detailed statistics on accepted applicants. Additionally, some applicants mentioned the importance of assigning mentors earlier in the process for better guidance and support.