SDN Logo
 
 

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Interview Feedback Summary

New York, NY

Allopathic Medical Schools | Private Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 21% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include "Tell me about yourself," "Why medicine," "Tell me about your research," "Why this specific medical school," and "Describe your experiences and background." Some respondents mentioned being asked personal questions and hypothetical scenarios, indicating a potential MMI format with nondisclosure agreements in place.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai discussed a wide range of topics, including experiences in Scouting, favorite research projects, childhood memories, and aspirations in medicine. The interviews varied from straightforward to conversational, with no standout questions mentioned, suggesting a diverse set of inquiries tailored to individual applications.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai discussed a wide range of topics, including personal beliefs, challenges faced, career aspirations, and ethical dilemmas. While the responses varied, some interviewees mentioned being asked about research dissemination, emotional encounters with patients, reasons for choosing medicine, and handling ethical scenarios. It's worth noting that the interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) as some responses referenced non-disclosure agreements regarding specific questions asked.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing their application materials, practicing with friends, reading the school's website, and looking at interview feedback on platforms like SDN. Suggestions included reviewing current events, practicing answering common questions, and discussing the program with current students to gain insight into the school's culture.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendly and enthusiastic student body, the quality of facilities and housing, the emphasis on a non-competitive and collaborative environment, the school's location in New York City, and the opportunities available for clinical experiences and research. Common feedback included the affordability and quality of student housing, the supportive and welcoming atmosphere, and the genuine happiness expressed by students at the school.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the lack of preparation and engagement from interviewers, unimpressive facilities, disorganization during the interview day, negative interactions with students or faculty members, and a perceived bias towards Ivy League applicants. Suggestions included improving interviewer training, enhancing facility conditions, increasing organization during interview days, fostering a more welcoming environment, and addressing any biases in the admissions process.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the lack of emphasis on specific questions during interviews, the relaxed atmosphere, the need for comfortable shoes due to extensive walking, the early arrival time, and the financial aid presentation. They also mentioned the importance of being prepared to summarize their candidacy briefly and to inquire about their parents' financial contribution.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally provided feedback about Mount Sinai's interview process, emphasizing the overall friendliness of the staff and students, relaxed interview atmosphere, and positive impressions of the school's community and facilities. Some applicants noted a mix of experiences with interviewers, ranging from laid-back and conversational to more confrontational or disorganized interactions.
  • Sinai should drop the elitism attitude. They need to also fire misogynistic men who question whether or not a student can handle the time commitment due to their gender. I do not recommend this school based on the toxic admissions committee.
  • Amazing school, hope I get in since it's my top choice
  • Incredible place
  • Great interview experience! Even if I don't get in, it was a great visit.
  • Generally relaxed day

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should improve communication and transparency regarding admissions decisions, be more welcoming and responsive, and provide clearer directions for navigating the admissions process and interview day. Additionally, some applicants appreciated the friendly and responsive admissions staff, while others recommended minor improvements such as offering MSSM pens instead of pencils and using an online interview scheduler.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by train or subway to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either With students at the school or with students at the school.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel among the responses is Hotel Wales.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Great N/A
2010-11 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A