Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 27% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview mixed with a low stress level, and felt they did well.
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions ▼
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about leadership style, handling conflicts, impactful experiences from shadowing, reasons for choosing medicine, addressing team communication breakdowns, dealing with stress, and reflecting on personal failures. While many questions focus on personal experiences and motivations, some interviews may be in MMI format with questions based on AMCAS experiences, ethical dilemmas, and health policy issues, possibly under nondisclosure agreements.
Tell me about a time you worked with a difficult person.
I was told to close my eyes while he set the seen of me walking in to a crowded bank. A bank robber came in and fired a shot that hit me in the arm. Luck or Unlucky? Quickly, first thing that comes to your head!
If a surgeon you were shadowing dropped gauze in a patient, but then you heard him tell the patient everything went well, how would you confront him? Would you tell the patient?
If a person had a living will that said to cut-off life support if vegetative/brain dead, but the family did not want that person to die, would you still pull the plug?
(not exact wording)
Suppose you are quarterback this week and it's the day after Match Day. The M1's went out to help the M4's celebrate. This morning your classmates are not being cooperative in PBL. How would you handle the situtation?
Given an 83 year old patient on a ventilator who has a terminal illness, and whose family wishes him to be taken off to die naturally, what would you do?
What would you do if you didn't get into medical school? If you couldn't ever get into med school? What career would you want that isn't medically related?
All questions related to my file. (Other than the obvious "why medicine?" questions.) It was less like an interview and more like they were just trying to get to know me. VERY low stress.
First interviewer: "If a 12 yr old wanted contraception, would you tell her parents?" "What are your favorite activities?" "If you only had time for one activity(because med school was taking up so much of your time), which would you pick? (my activities were biking, snowboarding, volunteering and visiting my family)." "What do you think will be the hardest part of med school for you?"
First interviewer: "You scored a 25 on your MCAT. This is bad. Explain this." "What do you think about that woman in Florida whose husband wants to pull the plug on her but the family doesn't? What would you do if you were her Dr?"
Second interviewer: "What should I know about you?" "What do you think about the Atkins diet?" "Why is obesity a problem in America?"
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Missouri School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, from personal traits for physicians to health care disparities and ethical dilemmas. The interview format may have been an MMI based on mentions of hypothetical scenarios and non-disclosure agreements, with questions aiming to assess critical thinking, ethics, and problem-solving skills.
What do you think you're going to enjoy least about being a doctor? What will you enjoy the most?
It seems like everyone has a course that they would have loved to take, but it didn't fit in their schedule. What course do you wish would you could have taken and why?
Suppose medical care and prescriptions are free, and there is a doctor for every square mile -- so access and affordability are not barriers -- would that solve the healthcare problems in this state? Why or why not?
Have you gotten any interviews at other schools yet? Which schools?
I realize that I didn't have to answer this question, but it was a little awkward and I wish I would have prepared more on how to respond to something like this. It caught me off guard.
"I see you have a lot of paid experience, why don't you have a lot of volunteer experience?" Was a strange question because I do have a lot of volunteer experience.
I am interested in fertility so one of my interviewers focused on ethical situations surrounding that area. For instance, he asked me what I thought about cloning? What about parents who want two clones of the same person? What about 10 clones of the same person?
I want to work in an underserved area. My interviewer asked my how, being a good student, I will deal with being (relatively) underpaid to some people with less altruistic motivations.
There was a question based off of a Florida man who wanted to remove the feeding tube from his wife, but his wife's parents wanted her to stay on it. I was asked what I would do as the family physician.
If we have a drug that controls a disease and costs $1, and one that controls the disease better for $5, are we obligated to give the $5 one to everyone regardless of ability to pay. This question was set up to test economic medical thinking and to see if you have researched health care costs and trends. I think he asked me it because I have a business minor.
I too was given the match-stick problem mentioned in one of the previous posts. Although it was great fun for the entire 15 or so seconds it lasted, the time afterward was a bit awkward. I'm still unaware of what purpose it served -- maybe to put me at ease somehow, which I already was. I think the interviewer intended it to last a bit longer, and maybe have me ask him for clues, but it was all very straight-forward.
Who is Quintin Tarantino? (Also, who is Jessica Lynch, what country was she held in, and who is the governor of Missouri... I think he was employing some tactic to through me off) :o)
What are some of the challenges surrounding health care for the non-English speaking of this country? What kinds of solutions are there to help this situation?
If you love the Missouri environment so much, why did you elect to attend Harvard as an undergrad? Oddly enough, both of my interviewers wanted to know the answer to this question, despite the fact that I never said that I "loved" the Missouri environment. I had simply stated that I was originally from Missouri. Based on their line of questioning, it seemed as if they were annoyed at the fact that I picked Harvard over Mizzou as an undergrad.
The questions were exactly as I expected and had prepped for. Absolutely no surprises in either of my interviews. I'm from the city, so if I had to pick an "interesting question" it would be "The rural population in America has been known to generally visit the doctor as an absolute last resort rather than as a preventative measure. What do you perceive to be the cause behind this trend and how would you formulate a solution?"
One of the interviewers presented me with the scenario that a 39-year old expectant mother had an amniocentesis (sp?) done and discovered her fetus had Down's syndrome. He asked me what advice I would give her if she came to me seeking help.
Don't you think your lifestyle choice (I indicated that I had done work for Lesbian Community Project on my AMCAS application)will negatively impact your relationship with your patients?
If you were President Bush's "right hand" woman and he asked you how to deal with the problem of child abuse in the U.S., what ideas would you have?
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Missouri School of Medicine discussed various topics including handling stress, healthcare system comparisons, ethical dilemmas, and personal motivations for pursuing medicine. Some respondents mentioned scenarios involving insurance coverage, ethical decision-making, and personal weaknesses, while others faced inquiries about healthcare disparities, medical malpractice, and career choices, indicating a diverse range of challenging interview questions.
"Is there anything I missed that you think I should know?"
If your sister was in a critical car accident and was unable to make decisions for herself, would you rather have her physician use moral or ethical judgement? He offered no clarification
An ethics and insurance scenerio was given; and I had to decide if what I would do if a more effective form of treatment was recommended to a patient but the insurance wouldn't pay for it
Why do you want to be a doctor?
It took me several weeks to craft a good answer to this question. I had too much to say and didn't know how to filter my answer. I gave my answer to this question (only one interviewer asked me) and it seemed to bore him a little as my answer was kinda long (about 3-5 minutes).
Talk about an experience in a group where you received criticism and how you dealt with it. They asked many questions concerning this considering the curriculum is based upon group work.
Are you interested in research? (I may have hung myself with my answer-I said no, which is true. The vast majority of my interests are international medicine, teaching, and primary care.) I know Mizzou is trying to increase its reputation as a research institution.
I was asked what concerned me about being a doctor, began to answer and interviewer went into a mini tirade about what I was about to say. (about socialism of medicine) Apparently she was very liberal and didn't like what I was about to say. This surprised me somewhat and I wasn't sure how to handle it. Was I supposed to stand up for myself (if she did it on purpose). I was hesitant to speak against her opinions cuz I didn't want to make any enemies.
What is your solution to the medical malpractice crisis? I believe I was asked this particular question due to my experience in the insurance industry. It seems they make an effort to tailor questions to the individual, rather than throw a random curveball.
I was given an ethical situation where a woman had requested non-aggressive treatment if she fell ill, and I was the doctor and had to tell the family what I was going to do. Answer (as the interviewer stated): never kill a patient...always do everything you can.
None. I was asked a question about the best public health advancement. My interviewer meant vaccines or antibiotics, but I thought he was asking about policies so I answered wrong.
I think it was more difficult for the interviewer to ask me than it was for me to answer him. Following the little match-stick "puzzle," he looked at the next question on his sheet and somewhat reluctantly mustered up the courage to ask me what I had learned from the puzzle that would serve me in medical school. I think he expected me to lean over and say "you've got to be joking right? If this is any indication of what a student here should expect, then this curriculum is a joke."
I was given a matchstick puzzle. 16 matchsticks were arranged to form 5 squares and I had to find a way to (moving only 2 matchsticks) for 4 equal sized squares. Very challenging (and fun)!!
If we were to indeed accept you into our MD/PhD program, convince me that you would in fact attend Mizzou this time around. Not even a question, but it again provided a glimpse into his annoyance w/ my decision to not attend Missouri as an undergrad. I felt literally driven to tell him "look, you and I both know Mizzou is not my first choice, but if I underwent the application process, it obviously means I'm interested, so can we please move onto some questions pertaining to my application."
None really. Just stay calm (easier said than done I know, but believe me there is nothing difficult that they'll be asking you. If it sounds difficult, its b/c you're making it). See the comments section below, and tailor your responses to the advice I'm giving you. That should be the theme you're weaving your story around.
What will you do if you don't get into medical school this year? This was difficult because I told him that I had been already accepted. My interviewer became visibly annoyed, so I answered with what I would have done. This did not appease him. It was clear the interview was over at that point, though he did continue to ask me questions.
What other schools that you are applying to are PBL (Problem based learning) format? (I couldn't remember of the 16 which were which really, but I wasn't picking for that specifically, so the interviewer seemed okay with it).
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing their application materials, researching the school and its unique aspects, practicing mock interviews, studying healthcare policies and current events, and reading interview feedback on platforms like SDN. It was also suggested to be confident, treat the interview as a conversation, and be prepared to discuss personal motivations for pursuing medicine and attending the specific school.
SDN, google doc with stereotypical interview questions and possible responses, talking to other current and past applicants about their experiences, bulleted list of key points I wanted to touch on, some questions to ask the interviewers, etc.
Remember to dress the part and be confident! For me, it helped a lot to think of it more as a conversation than an interview. They are trying to get to know you.
Know the Tell me about yourself > Why medicine > Why this school like the back of your hand. Mizzou loves hearing about PBL so dive into that (even though interview day will tell you a lot more about it)
SDN interview feedback page, researching Mizzou's curriculum and mission/values materials, reviewing my primary and secondary apps, researching the Affordable Care Act
SDN Interview feedback, read over my application (primary and secondary), talked about my answers to questions I "knew" were coming with my wife.
Read through SDN's forums, looked over my application, read about HMOs, PPOs, the national healtcare crisis, etc., and practiced answering questions with my family
Ask myself various questions and write down the answer.
Among many, let me list some.
Why is so unique about me?
What is my vision and goal as a physician?
Why did I choose to do certain clinical and other experiences?
What is community service and why did I do it?
What is medical school (harder to answer than you think)
and other questions that help me find out who I am and what really matters to me
SDN, school website, primary and secondary, also researched healthcare crisis (they were interested to know what I thought were the problems and the suggestions I had to lessen them.)
read student doctor net, wrote down answers to questions, mock interviews, practiced talking and giving responces in front of the mirror, researched the school and health issues in state.
The usual: read school website thoroughly, read SDN feedback, developed list of expected questions and answered them, reviewed my answers to standard questions, tried to find my happy place.
Well, I had one great advantage. I've already been accepted to other med schools, and am in the process of shopping for the one w/ the best financial aid package. Having that monkey off my back really relaxed me. And by viewing some of the comments on this site, I knew not to expect any bells and whistles. If you've had other interviews, then expect a fairly primitive version of one at mizzou. Very very basic. Very relaxing, makes you feel like you're 16 all over again applying for your first job. I mean, one of my interviewers was wearing a faded, untucked polo...no joke.
SDN, reviewed AMCAS application, and reviewed secondary. I listen to NPR, which proved to be useful particularly during my first interview. I also keep up with current events.
Reviewed my app, the AMCAS, and talked to 14 very close friends who are either current students or had been accepted and then elected to go to another school. The fact that all of these individuals are just one year ahead of me made what they had to say very pertinent since the admission criteria is not varied significantly from year to year. See the comments section below for a very very very helpful summary of what advice I was given.
Read interview feedback, had mock interviews, read my application file, got up to date on current events, read the school's website, spoke with a doctor who does preceptorships with MU med students.
Read through a list of interview questions I pulled from various sites on the web, read a book on healthcare policy, reviewed University of Washington's medical ethics website.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and enthusiasm of the students, staff, and interviewers, as well as the emphasis on problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. They also appreciated the high-quality facilities, focus on community, and the low-stress environment at the school. Suggestions for improvement were minimal, with only a few minor comments about tour guides, faculty attitude, and the need for more interaction with the faculty.
Current students were all very humble, genuine, and knowledgable about the school.
That the interviewers are really trying to get to know you as a person, it is less about your achievements (academic or not) or standouts on your application. You can tell that they care about who they will be inviting into their community and want to make sure that those people will be a good fit.
WARMEST zoom interview I've been to. Made a great impression of the faculty and even saw the facilities "virtually" which look impressive. New research building in October 2021
I majored in psychology and I was paired with a former psychology major and a child psychiatrist. It did not seem like I was randomly paired with interviewers, but paired based on our common interests
The staff was really friendly and I love their PBL set up. Also I enjoyed my student interviewer, he seemed to be really knowledgeable about the school and answered a lot of my questions.
Everyone at MU is very welcoming and warm - my interviewers asked challenging questions, but they were laid-back about it and not at all confrontational. The Sim Center is amazing - I had to go back to get my BLS there, and they were nice enough to show me even more of the incredible equipment and technology that I didn't get to see on the tour. The anatomy lab has been renovated, although we did not get to see it on our tour. We had a very nice lunch were we had a chance to talk to an M1 and an M2 who were leading our tour. I've also talked to several current med students who love the PBL curriculum - they say that it makes the boards a lot easier, plus they have more free time outside of class to do other, non-med school things.
The friendliness of the interviewers, staff, and students; the willingness of the staff to answer questions; the fantastic campus; the lazy river (!!) in their lush athletics complex
The PBL learning: 10 hours in group settings and only 10 hours of lecture each week. Also the format of the school in blocks - 8 week blocks, 1 week of evaluation, and 1 week of break then restart with longer breaks during Christmas and over the summer
Very clean facility. The medical school building was almost brand-new including lecture halls, library.
The gym is amazing!!!! it even has tanning beds too (what the heck!)
The current students said that they scored in the top 10 for USMLE board scores last year and were 12th this year (above Harvard) and they loved the PBL.
The tour guides were really friendly and informative. They had honest answers for all of my questions. The school has also just received a $2.3 million gift to buy high-tech mock patients. It sounded really neat, and they should be in place by the next school year. They university also has plans to add a new building to the med school to provide better facilities for students. It seems like they are really working hard to make this a top-notch medical school.
The people! We got to see PBL in action, and everyone was happy and in a good mood. It seemed like a friendly place, and all of the students emphasize the need for being well-balanced and engage in social activites. Yet the students score way above the national average on boards...
1) The overwhelming satisfaction of the students with the PBL curriculum; 2) The involvement of the faculty in the PBL curriculum and personal success of the students; 3) The block schedule for curriculum, testing, rest time; 4) The success of PBL and testing format in preparing students for excellent results on boards; 5) The PBL lab set-up; 6) Proximity of school to the hospital complex (connected) and to ammenities of the larger campus community (brand new rec center is right outside the north doors)
low stress level of students, stress free testing environments. Exams are administered to students, open note, open book, and you are able to take the exam anywhere on campus where you feel comfortable. Honor Code of course is important. High scores on board exams
The students were really laid back and happy. Everyone was very nice. Having attended MU for my undergrad I wasn't too excited to stay for medical school, but after having spent some time there with the faculty and students I am really excited that I might get to go!
The students were very happy and said they have a lot of free time. Board scores are very high and it is very likely that you will get your residency choice.
The PBL curriculum encourages cooperation. Teamwork is encouraged. You're expected to study hard on your own to help your team. In exchange you get a fair amount of free time. This is a family-friendly school in all respects.
Very impressive hospital and facilities. Very nice environment. Everyone seems pleased to be working there (not just med students but also a lab tech and a few custodians that I also spoke with).
One of my interviewers was incredible, and her enthusiasm for the school was contagious. (Although not enough to win me over after I got home and thought about my overall experience.) The students seem very happy with PBL.
the interviewers were so pleasant. very nice to talk with. the students seemed very happy to be there, but at the same time did not seem arrogant like at some other schools. The PBL facilities are very nice. All the students get a desk w/ cabinets in the study/pbl room.
The students' attitudes were Amazing. The kids love it there, and there's an enormous sense of a social community amongst the entire class / school / university / town!
My interviewers were awesome. One was a really down to earth ER doc and the other was an equally affable ped. urologist. Both of them were very nice, asked meaningful questions, and allowed the interview to flow. At one point the ER doc and I got to talking about some peripheral topic and I said something to the effect of "At some point here we're going to have to get back to the interview" to which he responded, "this is the interview."
Financial Aid staff was extremely friendly. I felt more at ease w/ them and the receptionist than w/ anyone else in the school. The student giving the tour did NOT want to be there, let alone answer questions.
I was excited to see that the faculty care about the students. This extends from the secretary in the office all the way to the finacial aid officer. I definetely liked the feeling I got from the school
I had paid previous visits to the facilities, so there were no surprises. I was pleased w/ the attitude of the staff and the students; not the faculty though -- see below.
The curriculum -- PBL. Lots of small groups, learning through case-based study and clinical contexts. Also, the students and staff were very accessible and down-to-earth.
Applicants commonly expressed negative feedback regarding mispronunciation of names, short interview times leading to rushed interactions, uninterested or challenging interviewers, lack of diversity among students and faculty, outdated facilities, disorganized tours, lack of lunch provided, and high tuition costs. Suggestions included improving interviewer engagement, increasing diversity efforts, updating facilities, providing better organization during tours and interviews, and addressing high tuition concerns.
My faculty interviewer did not seem particularly interested at some points. Very one-directional, the interviewers did not seem to want to talk about their experiences.
The M4 who led our tour acted like an ass. He had some useful advice and insight into the school, but he mostly seemed insistent on demonstrating his coolness to our tour group: barging into rooms of M1s and M2s taking exams, repeatedly bringing up that PBL left him a lot of time to lift weights, bragging about his boards scores, etc.
I was disappointed that the Dean of Admissions was unable to meet with us and also disappointed in how much they tried to sell the clinical simulations building.
Very little diversity, or attention given to the issue (Ie, 2007 class w/ zero black students, 2006 class w/ zero Hispanic students) No office of cultural diversity or individual in charge of minority recruitment. Every other school I have interviewed at has at least made an effort in this regard.
Less than 10% of the class were minority descent. I saw no Asian, Latino students while I visited. I am a Asian American and would like to see some diversity within the class.
I had an aggressive interviewer that seemed to challenge me on whether I would even consider accepting an offer from Mizzou. I didn't like feeling singled-out for having an application above their averages.
Also, my interview day lasted late (until 6:30 pm), but that was very circumstantial and my last interview was very enjoyable (1.5 hours worth!)
a car is definitely necessary and as someone coming from living in a really busy city, quite a change of pace and things to do...traveling to get there took two very small jet planes so commuting to see my boyfriend/friends would be really difficult
The tour guides were helpful and nice, but barely gave us a tour at all. They only showed us a couple classrooms, and a lab. I went to undergrad here and knew the school well, but I'm sure that others were unimpressed.
I barely got a tour. My tour guide was very unprepared and didn't seem to care about giving a tour. He was rushed (expected to show the whole site in half an hour) and so didn't do much more than ask if we had questions i.e. we went up the elevator to the floor of the pediatric unit and didn't even leave the elevator area because he didn't really have time to show it to us, we looked into a classroom and he pointed into the direction of the labs, but that was it, no joke.
We didn't see any of the hospital's facilities on our tour-only classrooms. Also, there was no real organization regarding things beyond the tour and interviews (ie lunch)
out-of-state tuition...ouch
There also happened to be a murder in Columbia right before my interview day, police were around asking questions (I was told this is pretty unusual for Columbia.)
Not really a lecture hall or classroom because PBL is based on group work in study type rooms. Could be negative to someone who prefers the lecture style of learning. I was not so impressed with the anatomy lab. Very old and out of date facility but of course the focus is on the bodies there not the the state of the classroom.
Our tour didn't really show us anything. We saw the library and the conference room where our tour guides PBL group met, nothing else. Not sure if this is all there is of the school or if its all they can show, but pretty lame.
The interviewer on the selection committee had never interviewed applicants before. Also, the day didn't seem very organized. No presentations from financial aid or a dean. In the 1+ hour between interviews and the tour, another applicant and I were told to leave and come back later. And as everyone else has mentioned, no lunch.
My first interview was one of the worst experiences of my life. The interviewer was the rudest, cockiest, most presumptious man I had ever met in my life. He was unorganized; he had the wrong person's information in front of him the entire time. He grilled me about the death of my mother to the point where I was almost in tears, he interrupted my answer to almost every question, and he assumed that my long-distance relationship with my boyfriend would cause me to fail classes. I wanted to hit him on several occasions. Also, the interview went longer than it was supposed to, making me late for my second interview. He seemed more amused with himself and the ridiculous questions he was asking, than how qualified I was to go to the school. I wrote the school a letter to complain about him. I got in eventually, but I don't know if that letter helped or not. At least it didn't hurt my chances too much.
Some of the points mentioned previously. I'm also sort of amazed by how much negative feedback I'm seeing on this site. True, individual experiences do vary, but I've also looked at the feedback for some of my other candidate schools, and this one definitely stands out for its number of negative experiences. "Thousands of wolves can't all be wrong." In fact one of the positive experiences noted, was posted by a current 2nd year -- no offense, but it just seems a bit desparate. I'm wondering why none like him/her were around when I visited the school, and the only student I met was the tour-guide. Makes one wonder if its really a 2nd year student, or if the Dean's found a new medium of expression.
Any as for the financial aid package -- don't waste your money on the flight tickets. Whether you're a state-resident or not, you'll get a much better deal attending a private school.
The school seemed kind of boring. All of the students said they had boring teachers. Many of the lectures are taught by guest lecturers and there isn't much continuity week to week.
The cost of attending Columbia is outrageous for a state school. In recent years, they have raised tutition as much as 10% per year, and the tuition is not fixed for entering students. Also, they don't seem to give a lot of scholarship money. The town of Columbia seemed really isolated.
The students giving the tour were very nice people, but the seemed unimpressed with the school. This is probably b/c I was comparing them to tour guides at other schools that were so passionate about their institution. The MS1s doing out tour spent alot of time griping about things that weren't cool about the school. Also, they are not big on anatomy at all.
The faculty. The ones that they've prepped to give "the company line" all follow that order from their higher-ups like sheep. You'll be able to see right through this. My advice is to talk to other faculty members. I did, and saw the school for what it really was. I found faculty who weren't as happy as the school would have you believe. The truth is, and it became even more evident from my conversations w/ the faculty, that the hospital is in trouble. It is financially strapped, and its doing everything it can in the way of damage control. Unfortunately, not much is possible and so they've refocused some of their efforts to keep the Columbia community and even its own faculty and staff confused about the situation so they'll give up their zeal for finding out. One faculty member told me that a few years ago, the teaching hospital tried expanding its wings, and acquired a small local hospital that was in similar trouble. Unfortunately, that hospital was on the market in the first place b/c it was in terrible debt, and its administrators were unable to keep it afloat. So w/ its acquisition, MU literally paid to acquire a huge problem, and has not been able to fix it since. Its resources have been further drained by internal squabling about how to fix the problems. Another faculty member figuratively wiped his forehead in relief when I told him my MCAT score and GPA. He was actually relieved when he found out MU was one of my backup schools. He told me this was not a place to go unless it was an absolute last resort. W/ a skyrocketing budget, outrageous debt, and cuts at the state level, the future reputation of the school is up in the air. He told me as far as national residency programs are concerned, although my board scores and grades in med school are important, they'll also be taking into consideration where I graduated from. And if it comes down to applicants from MU and some other school, they're much more likely to settle for the other applicant since they're weary about the curriculum here. For example, they may say "sure the MU applicant scored a few points higher on the boards, but he/she may have had more time to prep for the exam since the curriculum is not as challenging as that of this other institution." I would definitly 1) talk to faculty other than those hand-picked to talk to you 2) watch their body language as they answer questions b/c some have literally been kept in the dark regarding the woes of the school and you'll be able to see right through it despite their rather political answer, and 3) be careful NOT to come across as being offensive in you questioning. Remember, some of these faculty members teach there b/c Columbia is such an awesome community, and they're rasing their families there, and its not easy to just go teach elsewhere whenever you please. However, they also know that they're being lied to by some top administrators regarding the future of the school, and its affiliated hospitals. And they know that they can't do much about that. There's an element of helplessness. The last thing they want is some applicant who's just there for a day, coming around asking him/her about why the place is in shambles as if implying that that faculty member is somehow contributing to the problem. Anyway, use your own best judgement. I was lucky enough to find some very helpful faculty members, but I had less coopertive ones too, and so I backed off w/o sounding offensive.
One interviewer was not up-to-date on his information for the newer and alternative practices in medicine, the admissions office had an imperial attitude, with the exception of the receptionist, the clinician, who I liked, didn't particularly believe in the curriculum, there are double the number of students per cadaver as compared to the other institutions where I interviewed, and there was a complication with my interview and instead of taking me to an office to explain this, the admissions administrator told me in the common area with other interviewees for the day.
They need to give us lunch, I drove hours and was starving. Tour should have included at least a view of the hospital where the clinical stuff all happens, we just sort of walked down a hallway nearby....
almost everything. i did not like the curriculum, a lot of it is self-taught, even anatomy. they give you a cadaver and tell you to go for it, w/o any instructions. the interviwers were struggling to ask me questions. they kept me for a third interview, usually you only have two. i'm still not quite sure why. they kept me waiting an hour for a pointless 15 min interview. doesn't seem very intellectual.
Applicants commonly wished they had known more about the interview format, emphasizing the importance of being prepared to talk at length and handle unexpected questions. Additionally, many suggested familiarizing oneself with the school's specific focus on aspects like personal qualities, clinical experience, and campus location to better tailor their responses and expectations for the interview process.
That it's not that stressful. The interviewers are like your attorney - they want to do their best to help you "win" in a sense.. so take advantage of that. Don't be modest. If you have a lot of experience, let them know and elaborate on it.
Mizzou considers significant patient experience to be a MUST, I lacked this to some degree. One of my interviewers was very judgmental about this during my interview, and was constantly coming back to the topic of patient experience.
The interviewer were there to support me. When I had difficult time finding a right word to say, as English is my second language, the interviewer helped me pick right word for me.
The admission committee knows that there is very little, if any, diversity within the class. They want to recruit students from different racial, ethnical backgrounds. This showed very obviously during my interview.
The meeting with the Dean of Students was as a group. She goes around the table peppering each applicant with questions to get to know you, so it is sort of like a mini interview -- except the Dean does not have a vote at the adcom meeting.
How much they focus on having clinical experience (I know this is looked at heavily by other schools, but here, it seemed like without it, you were pretty much already rejected regardless of other application factors).
How much down time we would have, and how far the parking lot is from the med school. You have to walk through the hospital and nursing school to get to the med school.
i thought one interview would be with a med student which i thought would be more laid back and one with a physician but one interview was with clinical science professor
They use a point system to decide who is accepted. You may not be accepted by the first round and put on next round, and so on until March of the next year.
That the interview would be REDICULOUSLY easy and LOW, LOW stress. All we did was talk during both interviews, often times things highly intellectual, yet unrelated to medicine, science, or the university.
I wish I had known one of my interviewers was very liberal - our disagreement may not change her opinion of me, but then again it may. If it does, I would've stayed away from that topic in particular.
That I would also be given a 1 on 1 meeting with the financial aid advisor. I didn't know about this, so it would have been nice to prepare a couple of questions, but I can always contact him later if I have any concerns.
That what prior positive feedback has noted about the students being happy with PBL is an understatement; that what prior negative feedback has attempted to convey about the school is a bunch of BS from malcontents, ivy wannabees and others who cannot accept MU for what it is: a modest state school in an out-state area, which has an excellent, progressive curriculum which does an excellent job preparing physicians for patient care (yes, especially but not only for primary care)
I knew that they didn't serve lunch at all, but I would have liked to have brought some money with me to get a drink or something at the cafe in the hospital while I waited for my interview. I ended up borrowing from a friend who was interviewing on the same day.
The goal of the interviews seemed to be to kinda through you off or stress you a little. As if they want to see how you respond to stress (or something like that).
There was no financial aid presentation for us. Luckily, one of the other applicants told me that I could just go to the office of the financial aid director and talk to him. He was very helpful, and it was great to have a one-on-one financial aid discussion, but if she hadn't told me about it, I wouldn't have known.
NO LUNCH...you gotta fiend for your self on that one. I thought that we would also get some kind of financial aid presentation with the tour, but that was not that case. Also, the parking lot they suggest is not very close to where they tell you to meet, so women, if you are wearing heels, make sure you bring along some comfy shoes also.
I wish I would've visited this site and chanced upon the comments of one of the applicants who provided a very thorough and, I must say, accurate summary of the admission process at Mizzou. Prior to my interview, I had roughly surmised some of the conclusions/observations that he/she came to, and if anything, I firmly believe that it was me giving my interviewers exactly what they were trained to hear that got me accepted. Like I said previously, my interviewers seemed annoyed that I was even there. I had went into the interview wanting to tell the truth about my future plans, but about five minutes in, the message was clear: "this is NOT the east coast...you're on our turf now, and if you want to get in, you dance to our tune and tell us what we want to hear." Like I said, had I paid a visit to this site, and read some of the feedback, I would've known exactly what to expect. I'm happy I improvised, and obviously, did it just in time. My advice to anyone, read the negative feedback on this site, and take it to heart. If you're from Harvard, or any schools on the east coast, or from anywhere but Mizzou for that matter, read the negative feedback on this site, and do not go into the interview w/o reading that very thorough feedback one of the interviewees posted on this site. Its long, but extremely informative.
Had I not known (from this website) that there would not be an opportunity for lunch, I would have wished to know that. I wish that I would have known what should have been a 2 1/2 hour visit could turn into the 5 hour marathon that it turned into. I also wish I would have known that attending the school tour is not worth it: all you are shown is the library, computer lab, study area, and mailboxes. Patient treatment and simulation areas, the gross anatomy lab, and the pathology lab are all off-limits, as is a tour of the hospital. Definitely not worth the effort to get there early.
Applicants generally found the interview process at the school to be laid-back and conversational, with some mentioning specific interviewers or interview dynamics that impacted their experience positively or negatively. There was mixed feedback on the school itself, with some applicants praising certain aspects like the relaxed environment and practical approach to medicine, while others expressed concerns about diversity, interview questions, and the emphasis on primary care.
i liked the school a lot, presentations were rushed
Great school overall, and the interview process is pretty laid back. If you are doing Zoom (virtual) interview, please realize that they monitor you the whole time.
There is a moderator in the room, normally an administrative staff who is a non-voting member of the interview committee. They will keep time and intervene if needed. Also, every applicant receives a numeric score for their interview and other portions of the application process, those who rank high enough at the end are extended seat offers.
Great school, incredibly friendly, seem very interested in the practical application of medicine which can be good or bad depending on what an applicant is looking for in their medical education.
Good school in general. They have 25 committee members, two of which are your interviewers. They also seem to bottleneck their amount of acceptance offers until late spring.
I was very impressed with MU's Medical School. If this is a school that you hope to get into, I would take interview preparation seriously, but not be too stressed out when you arrive on the day of the interview. The day is relatively relaxed, and the main thing the interviewers are looking for is honesty, well-reasoned and well-communicated answers, and an obvious love for medicine.
The process and interviews are very relaxed. Everyone seemed warm, friendly and open about the process and their role in it. This has to be one of the most laid back interview processes in the nation.
If you are serious about patient centered care, then Mizzou is an excellent school for you. If you are more into the research aspect (although Mizzou med school is good for that too) or are not into working with others, I would suggest applying somewhere else. I heard serveral times that they try to select students who jive well with working with others for PBL, are open and friendly, etc.
it seemed as if the questions they asked could be answered simply by looking at my application...i was very disappointed in the questions they asked me
Overall, I am a little indifferent about the whole experience. On one hand, this is my undergrad school + home state, but I did not feel like anyone was really trying to convince me to go there. Also, as a minority the issue of diversity is important to me, and I feel they lack effort in this regard (ie see 2007 class profile). I will see where else I get into and re-evaluate the school.
It was my first interview and I was very nervous. The room in which I interviewed was very hot, which didn't help me at all (sympathetic nervous system, remember?) But the interviewer so kindly handed me a cold water out of a mini refridge. The interviewer made it toally conversational so that I was able to relax by the middle of the interview.
Overall, it went very well. Most of the interviews are very conversational and very pleasant. I had one interview that was a bit aggressive, but not in demeaning me....more in recruiting me...
My day started in the morning w/ 2 interviews right away. There was another student who was doing the same. After our interviews, 3 other students joined us and we all had a round-table discussion w/ the dean of student affairs who asked us questions about ourselves as well. Then we went on a tour guided by an MS-1 and an MS-2 and ate lunch w/ them. After that, while the 3 students that joined us later interviewed, I had a quick one-on-one info session w/ the financial aid lady. They make you wait around a bit when you are finished to make sure your interviewers have turned in their review sheets of you and that the scores they gave you don't differ too much (if they do, you get a third interview).
The day was very relaxed. The admissions office has a comfortable waiting area with complimentary water and snacks. They give you a folder full of information about the school. I was interviewed by an orthopaedic surgeon and an 4th year student. Both interviewers were extremely nice and conversational. After the interviews we took a tour, lead by two M2s, of the PBL labs and lecture halls. Lunch was provided (sandwich, chips, cookie, drink). Then we met with the dean. The last thing on the agenda was stopping by the financial aid office to meet the advisor. She detailed how much it cost to attend Mizzou and what financial aid options are available. From start to finish the interview ''day'' took 3 1/2 hours.
You first talk with one of the deans, there were three students interviewing in the room and we went around the table and we each talked a bit about ourselves. Then I talked with the finacial aid dude. The student tour was next followed by lunch. Next was my first interview, then a half hour break followed by my last interview.
Two one hour interviews with practicing physicians at the hospital. Both have read over your AMCAS and your secondary so know what you wrote. Be prepared to reason through a few clinical ethics dilemmas. If the two evaluations of you disagree, you will get a third late interview. There also is a tour, lunch, and brief one-on-one meeting with a financial aid representative.
It was a good expereince. The interviews were very relaxed and relatively easy; interviewers weren't intimidating at all. Columbia seemed like a nice city to live in. Basically, I came away liking about every aspect of the school more than when I went in.
Very low-key. Two faculty interviews in the morning, along with a financial aid presentation. A tour and lunch with a med student afterwards, with three other applicants. The tone was very casual, and everyone made you feel comfortable.
There are only about 5 applicants per interview day, and you don't really interact with all of them at the same time because everyone's schedule is different. My first interview went well, but my second interviewer wasn't very impressed with my research or my interest in primary care. Afterwards we took a tour of the school, ate lunch with our student tour guides, and met with a dean of student affairs. For most people, this is the extent of the interview day, but I was offered a third interview because of the point discrepency between my first two interviewers.
It was a really great experience. The only downside I can see to this school is that its in Columbia. I was not expecting to like it as much as I did. Overall, my interviews were fairly informal and allowed for alot of discussion and questions
I had an interview at 9am that lasted a half hour. Then I had to wait for an hour and had a meeting with the financial aid guy. Then I waited a half hour, met with the dean of the med school, had a tour, and ate lunch. Then I waited another hour, had a second interview lasting a half hour, and then waited another half hour until I was dismissed at 3:00. Apparently this was the first day of interviews for the year so it was a little disorganized. There were only four of us there, and the other three all happened to go to high school together. The tour guides were friendly but didn't really show us anything, and read directly off of sheets of paper.
first interview with physician was good- we had a nice dialogue and felt we were on the same page.
second interview felt a bit off with the interviewer who looked at his watch a couple times.
The students that gave the tour were friendly and excited about being at Columbia. My interviews were not very stressful at all. One of the doctors that interviewed me asked me more about my family than anything else. It was a good experience overall.
The interview process was very positive. The interviewers just try to get to know you at first to calm you down before they start working in questions.
They are easy and try to get to know your motivations and your experiences. They drill you on your application and any soft spots, then throw some ethical situations at you. It was exactly what was expected.
It was very easy and fun, and a lot of the questions I was asked came straight from the feedback I had read on this site, so it seems that they tend to ask the same questions of each applicant.
My interview experience was great. The interviewers were really interested in getting to know me. There are no right or wrong answers to questions they asked, they just wanted to see what my thought process was like. They were very honest and open about everything
The students were really nice! We had a tour and lunch at noon. Then 2 one-on-one interviewers. My second interviewer was awesome! We had gone to the same undergrad, so we just talked about that school and campus life the whole time.
Although it was a low stress place I was pretty stressed about it because it was my first interview. The financial aid guy was very helpful, I recommend talking to him when you go for interviews. It was nice to see the med students really enjoy the school and have a tight-knit community.
Overall it was enjoyable. Everyone was friendly. It seems like most students had one informal/conversational interview, and one formal interview where the interviewer asks questions from a list. The first was very, very low stress, while the second was only moderately stressful. Also, lunch was provided for us (I have heard in the past that this was not the case).
The students were great. I felt like I was already one of them after the tour. My first interviewer was sincere and genuinely interested in who I was. I think my second interviewer thought I was somebody else. She asked questions that had to do with experiences I didn't do and blamed me for bad ones I never heard of. She also tried to prod me into answering her paradoxical questions the way she wanted me too. I didn't let her and I left feeling pretty bad about my chances.
We met for a tour at noon and were divided into small groups. Interviews were not until 2 so we were told just to hang out or go find lunch until then. My interviewers picked me up in the admissions office and took me to their offices for the interview so the interviews did not quite last an hour although you have the transit time to state your case if you need to.
I loved this school. I was really expecting not to like it after reading the comments on this site, but I loved everything about it (except the non-res tuition). PBL seems great, the students, faculty, and staff were all amazing, and I felt more comfortable than I have at any other interview.
They divide each interview day into morning group and afternoon group. The am people have two separate interviews, at 9am and 10am. Btwn 11-12, there is time to meet privately with the FA person, ask questions of the admin staff, explore campus or hospital, grab a bite to eat, etc. At noon, students provide a somewhat limited tour of the facilities to both the AM and PM groups. Our tour guides were very upbeat, helpful and eager to relate their experiences (all positive and informative).
Really good. I enjoyed talking with both physicians. They were very interested in my research and medical internships/hospital shadowing experiences. Even though they were discussed in my application, my interviewers wanted to talk about them in detail. Very relaxing, straightfoward, and fair.
All in all stress free. The interviews actually seemed very short, they were supposed to last closer to an hour and mine were done in around 20 min. Just review your app and think of what you may be asked about.
I had a great interview and I love the school. The interview was very informal and laid back. PBL seems an ideal fit for me. It is not for everyone, but I value independant study, active group learning, and free time for family. The students claimed to have A LOT of free time. I am suprized at the negative sentiment on this site about the school, it is fantastic. It is certainly my number one school. Oh and don't follow the "Tell em primary care" advice given by a previous poster. My interviewer specifically said that there is a rumor going around that if you tell MU that you are going into primary care you will get in, he said that was crap and they look for sincerity in applicants. If you have no desire for family medicine, don't tell them you do. They will see right through you.
The interviews were very laid back and i really felt the interviewers were really trying to get to know me, not size me up. There were some questions about current events and ethical issues, but nothing too tough.
nice enjoyable interviews. my first one went really well, my second one went pretty well, but was a bit more politically oriented. (which i like, but has the potential to alienate the other person) also, despite what mu lacks (which is pretty heavily emphasized on this site) the school is excellent, the avg board score is 8pts higher than harvard, a majority (85 pecent or so get their 1 or 2 residency slot).
Great experience. Financial problems formerly experienced by the institution appear to be behind them. Although the tuition is high for a state school, you get a great medical school experience in return. Their philosophy is more cooperative than many other schools. Why put your medical students through hell when they learn much more when they're happy?
I was more impressed with the school than I thought I would be, but since I have been accepted at other schools, I don't think I will attend Mizzou. The Problem Based Learning system is very impressive. Mizzou is much nicer than some previous reviewers will lead you to believe.
I'm currently a second year at MU - I'm posting this to share my experiences and to express my disgust at some of the comments posted on this site about my school. First of all, if this school is your 'back-up' or you feel you are too strong a candidate to actually consider this school, let me just enlighten you: no one with a snobby smarter-than-you attitude will make it at MU. Our strength comes from pointing out one another's weaknesses, teaching one another, and solving problems together. Numbers mean nothing the second you start school here. If reputation, rank, and tooting your own horn mean a lot to you, then you should look elsewhere. If you want to learn to be a compassionate, knowledgable, and adored physician, MU is for you. Even as a second year, I have encountered hundreds of patients, gained invaluable clinical experience, and out-smarted several residents from 'respected' institutions in clinic. So, here's my challenge: be a better physician than me. Your first obstacle: getting your head through the door. The class entering med school at MU this year is already lightyears ahead of you.
I was disappointed that we didn't get to meet very many students during the interview day. I think that a big part of the reason that I have a negative opinion of the school is that the few students I met had very different personalities, interests, and goals than I do, so I just felt like the school was a bad fit for me. One of my interviewers was downright hostile, while the other physician was an absolutely wonderful person to whom I could have sat and talked all day.
I came on this interview unsure about the school and the pbl process. I left the interview feeling like I really enjoyed my day. The interviewers, office staff, and students were all very pleasant and the atmosphere is great there.
GREAT! I really only applied there because I wanted to be in the midwest (i'm from Illinois), but everybody's attitudes were great and made me feel like, "Wow, this place is nice." I am thinking about surgery and didn't feel any pressure to say "I want to be a family practitioner." I want to re-iterate how really solid of a school this is. My MCATs and GPA were quite strong, and i went to a fairly prestigious undergrad (Vanderbilt) and I am not considering Mizzou as a backup. After the interview, it's high on my list.
Much less structured than any other interview I've been to. No presentations or anything like that, no lunch with students, perfunctory tour. I would say I enjoyed the experience more b/c I had interesting conversations with my interviewers than because I was really impressed with the school.
I've been accepted. Attitude of interviewers impacted me negatively. Financial Aid Staff know how to break the high-cost of attending MU gently. Final opinion = my visit only comfirmed why MU deserves to be a last tier school.
I think that this is a great school. Do not listen to some people on this site that think they know what the admissions committee wants to hear. Frankly, I am extremely upset that anyone would try to give such bad advice. I suggest you be honest!!! If you want to be a surgeon, do not hide it. Just because this school is known for its primary care physicians, does not mean they won't accept you because you don't want to be one. During my interview, I told the complete truth. I did not try to give answers I thought they wanted to hear. I gave answers that reflected my understanding and beliefs. Also for the record, I have been accepted and will attend this school in the Fall. So honesty does seem to be the best policy. P.S. I loved the school and do not believe this school should be considered a backup. It is insulting and frankly if that is your opinion, then perhaps you should go somewhere else. I have a high GPA and MCAT and I'm going.
Being from Missouri, I already knew quite a bit about the place. Its problems, as well as the type of applicant they're seeking. As far as the type of applicants they admit, I got some priceless help from 2 friends who are current students, and 12 who were admitted but went elsewhere. Their MCAT scores ranged from 25-33 (the ones who were admitted both had 25's), undergrad GPA's ranged from 3.4-4.0. Here's what they had to offer. They told me first to only use the school as a backup. They knew my MCAT and GPA figures and strongly recommended I only use it as a backup, which I am. Second, as far as the type of applicant they seek, keep a few helpful things in mind. Missouri is a rural-farming oriented state (KC and St. Louis are the only exceptions). This means any money the state allocates to programs, it will only do so if they support a rural-farming agenda. What does this mean for you as an applicant: DO NOT go in there saying you wanna practice medicine in an urban setting (e.g. KC/St. Louis). If you wanna get in, tell them you'll be practicing in a rural environment, while teaching (even if its part-time) at local health institutions (as to whom you'll be teaching there, tell them you'd like to see medical students and nurses doing part of their learning in such environments). You wanna emphasize teaching b/c as mentioned b4, MU is in trouble partly b/c its alumni don't return to serve the school. The admission committee has been told to admit those who are more likely to teach b/c there's a higher chance that those individuals will actually teach at MU (especially since private schools tend to be more selective and are less likely to give MU grads a job at their place). Next, if the interviewer inquires about your family, be sure to mention that you have a significant part of your family residing in Missouri, and that you'd like to someday raise a family here too, some place near Columbia in particular. They know that if you're gonna be teaching, and living near Columbia, then its not far-fetched to assume that MU's the place where you'll be doing it. Furthermore, regardless of which branch of medicine you're thinking about going into, tell them primary care is what interests you most. Apparently, MU is nationally ranked by US News and World Report as one of the top primary care institutions (don't be too impressed, this is a category that the more well known schools simply don't care about b/c it means nothing in the way of receiving grant money. One glimpse at the rankings, and you'll know that the more competitive schools rank right where they should when grant money is involved). But anyway, since this ranking is MU's one (and only) claim to pseudo-fame, the administration would like to hang on to it. So they wanna continue to recruit applicants who are interested in primary medicine. So this is another point you have to allude to during your interview. It doesn't matter if you'll be going into neurosurgery, they'll pass you right up if it means losing that ranking. This is the one thing that has allowed them to avoid scrutiny by the state. If they're constantly churning out doctors who serve the rural community w/ primary care, then the constituents are happy, and that means the lawmakers can continue to claim credit for excellent healthcare during difficult economic times, and that means they constantly get re-elected. So its not in their best interest to blow the whistle on an institution that is literally haning on by its fingernails. In addition to all of this, here's one more very important piece of advice. Admissions may get suspicious if too many applicants start giving the same EXACT responses. So keep in mind the basic underpinnings of my advice, but please please please keep your answers varied. You don't wanna shoot yourself in the foot by sounding like everybody else who walks through their door. Although you do have one thing working for you. My guess is, the majority of interviewees don't visit this website, and thus are not as likely to give the same response as you. And second, if you have to give the same EXACT responses I gave, then do so only if you're boder-line (MCAT = 24, GPA = 3.4 give or take a bit). I can tell you that this advice has indeed gotten in at least 14 other applicants, and by what one of my interviewers told me after the interview, has gotten me accepted as well. I know that it works period. There's no maybe's about it. But please keep the details of your answers varied. If you've scored high on the MCATs and have a high GPA, you have more room to take a chance w/ responses that are more and more removed from the advice that I gave here b/c you'll likely be accepted based on your scores (at MU or some other institution); however, as I mentioned, if you're borderline, I would strongly recommend that you stick to the advice that I've given here. Why am I giving you advice that no one else is willing to? I've applied to 15 schools, have interviewed at 8 already (including my 1st choice school), and thus far, have been invited to interview at 3 of the remaining 7. I don't mean to brag, but I'll probably be accepted to one of the other schools, and I'll opt for one of those choices. That means I won't be attending MU, and so I'm not hurting my chances by helping someone who is border-line. And I would definitely encourage others who are in my shoes. Please, if you KNOW that you won't have to resort to attending your back-up school, then help someone who does have to resort to that. After all, we'll all be doctors one day, and our profession is based more on cooperation than competition. Be competitive when you have to, but when its not warranted, then cooperate other future doctors.
Everyone there tried to make me comfortable and were very laid back and informal. This was my first interview, so I was really nervous and blew the first interview anyway. However, because there are two interviews, I could redeem myself on the second one. Don't sweat this one, and you'll probably like the school more after you leave.
I found the attitudes of the administration to be patronizing. I found the academician, who believes in the PBL curriculum at MU, to be out-of-date with the information he provided me in answer to my questions. The clinician, who was very personable and asked excellent questions, did not believe in the PBL format, which was telling. (Don't get me wrong--MU does get excellent results with this format and they do produce good doctors, as well.) The alumni I met with from MU was kind of a "cold fish". I wouldn't have wanted him for my doctor. All in all, I went in really wanting to like the place. It was my top choice. I left knowing that MU was not the school for me.
The interviews were very conversational. They were open file and they asked many questions about my AMCAS app. It was as relaxing as possible for an interview. I considered this one of my "safe" schools, if there is such a thing. After the interview, I consider this one of my top choices. The students seemed very relaxed and happy.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggest that the admissions office should send information earlier to allow for better preparation, consider longer and more conversational interviews, implement bias-free interviewers, create a less stressful acceptance schedule, offer more engaging activities during tours, and make the interview day more exciting to showcase the school effectively.
send information earlier so we have time to prepare questions
Please consider making the interview slight longer, maybe 20 minutes, so there is less of a rushed atmosphere. Also so both the interview committee and the student interviewing can continue to have a conversational like interaction.