Applicants generally found the interview process at the school to be relaxed and conversational. Some mentioned the friendly atmosphere, the emphasis on patient-centered care, and the importance of being genuine in responses. There were mixed feelings about the interviewers, with some finding them welcoming and others feeling indifferent or disappointed.
-
They give you an info packet a week before the interview, which is a good thing to read and be familiar with
-
Very relaxed, fun interview
-
I liked the school a lot, presentations were rushed
-
Great school overall, and the interview process is pretty laid back. If you are doing Zoom (virtual) interview, please realize that they monitor you the whole time.
-
There is a moderator in the room, normally an administrative staff who is a non-voting member of the interview committee. They will keep time and intervene if needed. Also, every applicant receives a numeric score for their interview and other portions of the application process, those who rank high enough at the end are extended seat offers.
-
Conversational great interview. Everyone warm and this school is top of my list
-
I loved my interview experience, they made me want to join the program
-
I loved the school, but the interview(s) left me with a bad taste. One of them was great! But the other was definitely not what I was expecting
-
Interview day was great, and thought the school rocked.
-
Great school, incredibly friendly, seem very interested in the practical application of medicine which can be good or bad depending on what an applicant is looking for in their medical education.
-
Good school in general. They have 25 committee members, two of which are your interviewers. They also seem to bottleneck their amount of acceptance offers until late spring.
-
I was very impressed with MU's Medical School. If this is a school that you hope to get into, I would take interview preparation seriously, but not be too stressed out when you arrive on the day of the interview. The day is relatively relaxed, and the main thing the interviewers are looking for is honesty, well-reasoned and well-communicated answers, and an obvious love for medicine.
-
Mizzou surprised me: it's a fantastic place.
-
I liked the school except for the interviewers. Complete turn off. Don't think I will get in, but probably wouldn't go if I did.
-
The process and interviews are very relaxed. Everyone seemed warm, friendly and open about the process and their role in it. This has to be one of the most laid back interview processes in the nation.
-
If you are serious about patient centered care, then Mizzou is an excellent school for you. If you are more into the research aspect (although Mizzou med school is good for that too) or are not into working with others, I would suggest applying somewhere else. I heard serveral times that they try to select students who jive well with working with others for PBL, are open and friendly, etc.
-
Relax and don't stress! The environment is very laid back and easy going. No need to be nervous.
-
It seemed as if the questions they asked could be answered simply by looking at my application...i was very disappointed in the questions they asked me
-
Overall, I am a little indifferent about the whole experience. On one hand, this is my undergrad school + home state, but I did not feel like anyone was really trying to convince me to go there. Also, as a minority the issue of diversity is important to me, and I feel they lack effort in this regard (ie see 2007 class profile). I will see where else I get into and re-evaluate the school.
-
It was my first interview and I was very nervous. The room in which I interviewed was very hot, which didn't help me at all (sympathetic nervous system, remember?) But the interviewer so kindly handed me a cold water out of a mini refridge. The interviewer made it toally conversational so that I was able to relax by the middle of the interview.
-
Very good, very conversational, not many standardized questions.
-
Overall, it went very well. Most of the interviews are very conversational and very pleasant. I had one interview that was a bit aggressive, but not in demeaning me....more in recruiting me...
-
My day started in the morning w/ 2 interviews right away. There was another student who was doing the same. After our interviews, 3 other students joined us and we all had a round-table discussion w/ the dean of student affairs who asked us questions about ourselves as well. Then we went on a tour guided by an MS-1 and an MS-2 and ate lunch w/ them. After that, while the 3 students that joined us later interviewed, I had a quick one-on-one info session w/ the financial aid lady. They make you wait around a bit when you are finished to make sure your interviewers have turned in their review sheets of you and that the scores they gave you don't differ too much (if they do, you get a third interview).
-
The day was very relaxed. The admissions office has a comfortable waiting area with complimentary water and snacks. They give you a folder full of information about the school. I was interviewed by an orthopaedic surgeon and an 4th year student. Both interviewers were extremely nice and conversational. After the interviews we took a tour, lead by two M2s, of the PBL labs and lecture halls. Lunch was provided (sandwich, chips, cookie, drink). Then we met with the dean. The last thing on the agenda was stopping by the financial aid office to meet the advisor. She detailed how much it cost to attend Mizzou and what financial aid options are available. From start to finish the interview ''day'' took 3 1/2 hours.
-
It was a good experience. Interviewers were very conversational but they still fired some good questions at me.
-
It was a fast interview day. Started at 1130. Met with Dean, had tour, lunch with students, then 2 ints, finally meeting with fin aid guy.
-
You first talk with one of the deans, there were three students interviewing in the room and we went around the table and we each talked a bit about ourselves. Then I talked with the finacial aid dude. The student tour was next followed by lunch. Next was my first interview, then a half hour break followed by my last interview.
-
Overall, I think it was a very good experience. The interviewers were extremely nice, and the interview as a whole had a conversational tone.
-
Pretty laid back
-
Both interviewers were very nice and easy to talk with. All I can say is to know yourself, and you'll be fine.
-
Two one hour interviews with practicing physicians at the hospital. Both have read over your AMCAS and your secondary so know what you wrote. Be prepared to reason through a few clinical ethics dilemmas. If the two evaluations of you disagree, you will get a third late interview. There also is a tour, lunch, and brief one-on-one meeting with a financial aid representative.
-
It was a good expereince. The interviews were very relaxed and relatively easy; interviewers weren't intimidating at all. Columbia seemed like a nice city to live in. Basically, I came away liking about every aspect of the school more than when I went in.
-
Very low-key. Two faculty interviews in the morning, along with a financial aid presentation. A tour and lunch with a med student afterwards, with three other applicants. The tone was very casual, and everyone made you feel comfortable.
-
There are only about 5 applicants per interview day, and you don't really interact with all of them at the same time because everyone's schedule is different. My first interview went well, but my second interviewer wasn't very impressed with my research or my interest in primary care. Afterwards we took a tour of the school, ate lunch with our student tour guides, and met with a dean of student affairs. For most people, this is the extent of the interview day, but I was offered a third interview because of the point discrepency between my first two interviewers.
-
It was a really great experience. The only downside I can see to this school is that its in Columbia. I was not expecting to like it as much as I did. Overall, my interviews were fairly informal and allowed for alot of discussion and questions
-
I had an interview at 9am that lasted a half hour. Then I had to wait for an hour and had a meeting with the financial aid guy. Then I waited a half hour, met with the dean of the med school, had a tour, and ate lunch. Then I waited another hour, had a second interview lasting a half hour, and then waited another half hour until I was dismissed at 3:00. Apparently this was the first day of interviews for the year so it was a little disorganized. There were only four of us there, and the other three all happened to go to high school together. The tour guides were friendly but didn't really show us anything, and read directly off of sheets of paper.
-
First interview with physician was good- we had a nice dialogue and felt we were on the same page.
second interview felt a bit off with the interviewer who looked at his watch a couple times.
-
The students that gave the tour were friendly and excited about being at Columbia. My interviews were not very stressful at all. One of the doctors that interviewed me asked me more about my family than anything else. It was a good experience overall.
-
The interview process was very positive. The interviewers just try to get to know you at first to calm you down before they start working in questions.
-
They are easy and try to get to know your motivations and your experiences. They drill you on your application and any soft spots, then throw some ethical situations at you. It was exactly what was expected.
-
Calm, intellectual, fun, conversational
-
I thought the tour could've been done better at least by ensuring the tourguide cared about giving the tour.
-
It was very easy and fun, and a lot of the questions I was asked came straight from the feedback I had read on this site, so it seems that they tend to ask the same questions of each applicant.
-
My interview experience was great. The interviewers were really interested in getting to know me. There are no right or wrong answers to questions they asked, they just wanted to see what my thought process was like. They were very honest and open about everything
-
The students were really nice! We had a tour and lunch at noon. Then 2 one-on-one interviewers. My second interviewer was awesome! We had gone to the same undergrad, so we just talked about that school and campus life the whole time.
-
Although it was a low stress place I was pretty stressed about it because it was my first interview. The financial aid guy was very helpful, I recommend talking to him when you go for interviews. It was nice to see the med students really enjoy the school and have a tight-knit community.
-
Overall it was enjoyable. Everyone was friendly. It seems like most students had one informal/conversational interview, and one formal interview where the interviewer asks questions from a list. The first was very, very low stress, while the second was only moderately stressful. Also, lunch was provided for us (I have heard in the past that this was not the case).
-
Very laid-back and comfortable. It was a welcoming and enjoyable environment.
-
The students were great. I felt like I was already one of them after the tour. My first interviewer was sincere and genuinely interested in who I was. I think my second interviewer thought I was somebody else. She asked questions that had to do with experiences I didn't do and blamed me for bad ones I never heard of. She also tried to prod me into answering her paradoxical questions the way she wanted me too. I didn't let her and I left feeling pretty bad about my chances.
-
We met for a tour at noon and were divided into small groups. Interviews were not until 2 so we were told just to hang out or go find lunch until then. My interviewers picked me up in the admissions office and took me to their offices for the interview so the interviews did not quite last an hour although you have the transit time to state your case if you need to.
-
I loved this school. I was really expecting not to like it after reading the comments on this site, but I loved everything about it (except the non-res tuition). PBL seems great, the students, faculty, and staff were all amazing, and I felt more comfortable than I have at any other interview.
-
They divide each interview day into morning group and afternoon group. The am people have two separate interviews, at 9am and 10am. Btwn 11-12, there is time to meet privately with the FA person, ask questions of the admin staff, explore campus or hospital, grab a bite to eat, etc. At noon, students provide a somewhat limited tour of the facilities to both the AM and PM groups. Our tour guides were very upbeat, helpful and eager to relate their experiences (all positive and informative).
-
A very relaxed and conversational interview.
-
Great...this school is very laid back. However, the first interview tends to be simpler than the second.
-
Excellent
-
Really good. I enjoyed talking with both physicians. They were very interested in my research and medical internships/hospital shadowing experiences. Even though they were discussed in my application, my interviewers wanted to talk about them in detail. Very relaxing, straightfoward, and fair.
-
It was a fairly laid back interview experience. If you know who you are, you will do fine.
-
All in all stress free. The interviews actually seemed very short, they were supposed to last closer to an hour and mine were done in around 20 min. Just review your app and think of what you may be asked about.
-
I had a great interview and I love the school. The interview was very informal and laid back. PBL seems an ideal fit for me. It is not for everyone, but I value independant study, active group learning, and free time for family. The students claimed to have A LOT of free time. I am suprized at the negative sentiment on this site about the school, it is fantastic. It is certainly my number one school. Oh and don't follow the "Tell em primary care" advice given by a previous poster. My interviewer specifically said that there is a rumor going around that if you tell MU that you are going into primary care you will get in, he said that was crap and they look for sincerity in applicants. If you have no desire for family medicine, don't tell them you do. They will see right through you.
-
The interviews were very laid back and i really felt the interviewers were really trying to get to know me, not size me up. There were some questions about current events and ethical issues, but nothing too tough.
-
Nice enjoyable interviews. my first one went really well, my second one went pretty well, but was a bit more politically oriented. (which i like, but has the potential to alienate the other person) also, despite what mu lacks (which is pretty heavily emphasized on this site) the school is excellent, the avg board score is 8pts higher than harvard, a majority (85 pecent or so get their 1 or 2 residency slot).
-
Great experience. Financial problems formerly experienced by the institution appear to be behind them. Although the tuition is high for a state school, you get a great medical school experience in return. Their philosophy is more cooperative than many other schools. Why put your medical students through hell when they learn much more when they're happy?
-
I wanted to cry.
-
Please see the rest of my comments.
-
I was more impressed with the school than I thought I would be, but since I have been accepted at other schools, I don't think I will attend Mizzou. The Problem Based Learning system is very impressive. Mizzou is much nicer than some previous reviewers will lead you to believe.
-
Good. My first interview was pretty stressful initially. However, I recovered well and was much more prepared for my second interview.
-
I'm currently a second year at MU - I'm posting this to share my experiences and to express my disgust at some of the comments posted on this site about my school. First of all, if this school is your 'back-up' or you feel you are too strong a candidate to actually consider this school, let me just enlighten you: no one with a snobby smarter-than-you attitude will make it at MU. Our strength comes from pointing out one another's weaknesses, teaching one another, and solving problems together. Numbers mean nothing the second you start school here. If reputation, rank, and tooting your own horn mean a lot to you, then you should look elsewhere. If you want to learn to be a compassionate, knowledgable, and adored physician, MU is for you. Even as a second year, I have encountered hundreds of patients, gained invaluable clinical experience, and out-smarted several residents from 'respected' institutions in clinic. So, here's my challenge: be a better physician than me. Your first obstacle: getting your head through the door. The class entering med school at MU this year is already lightyears ahead of you.
-
I was disappointed that we didn't get to meet very many students during the interview day. I think that a big part of the reason that I have a negative opinion of the school is that the few students I met had very different personalities, interests, and goals than I do, so I just felt like the school was a bad fit for me. One of my interviewers was downright hostile, while the other physician was an absolutely wonderful person to whom I could have sat and talked all day.
-
Seemed alright...pretty laid back.
-
I came on this interview unsure about the school and the pbl process. I left the interview feeling like I really enjoyed my day. The interviewers, office staff, and students were all very pleasant and the atmosphere is great there.
-
GREAT! I really only applied there because I wanted to be in the midwest (i'm from Illinois), but everybody's attitudes were great and made me feel like, "Wow, this place is nice." I am thinking about surgery and didn't feel any pressure to say "I want to be a family practitioner." I want to re-iterate how really solid of a school this is. My MCATs and GPA were quite strong, and i went to a fairly prestigious undergrad (Vanderbilt) and I am not considering Mizzou as a backup. After the interview, it's high on my list.
-
Much less structured than any other interview I've been to. No presentations or anything like that, no lunch with students, perfunctory tour. I would say I enjoyed the experience more b/c I had interesting conversations with my interviewers than because I was really impressed with the school.
-
I've been accepted. Attitude of interviewers impacted me negatively. Financial Aid Staff know how to break the high-cost of attending MU gently. Final opinion = my visit only comfirmed why MU deserves to be a last tier school.
-
I think that this is a great school. Do not listen to some people on this site that think they know what the admissions committee wants to hear. Frankly, I am extremely upset that anyone would try to give such bad advice. I suggest you be honest!!! If you want to be a surgeon, do not hide it. Just because this school is known for its primary care physicians, does not mean they won't accept you because you don't want to be one. During my interview, I told the complete truth. I did not try to give answers I thought they wanted to hear. I gave answers that reflected my understanding and beliefs. Also for the record, I have been accepted and will attend this school in the Fall. So honesty does seem to be the best policy. P.S. I loved the school and do not believe this school should be considered a backup. It is insulting and frankly if that is your opinion, then perhaps you should go somewhere else. I have a high GPA and MCAT and I'm going.
-
Being from Missouri, I already knew quite a bit about the place. Its problems, as well as the type of applicant they're seeking. As far as the type of applicants they admit, I got some priceless help from 2 friends who are current students, and 12 who were admitted but went elsewhere. Their MCAT scores ranged from 25-33 (the ones who were admitted both had 25's), undergrad GPA's ranged from 3.4-4.0. Here's what they had to offer. They told me first to only use the school as a backup. They knew my MCAT and GPA figures and strongly recommended I only use it as a backup, which I am. Second, as far as the type of applicant they seek, keep a few helpful things in mind. Missouri is a rural-farming oriented state (KC and St. Louis are the only exceptions). This means any money the state allocates to programs, it will only do so if they support a rural-farming agenda. What does this mean for you as an applicant: DO NOT go in there saying you wanna practice medicine in an urban setting (e.g. KC/St. Louis). If you wanna get in, tell them you'll be practicing in a rural environment, while teaching (even if its part-time) at local health institutions (as to whom you'll be teaching there, tell them you'd like to see medical students and nurses doing part of their learning in such environments). You wanna emphasize teaching b/c as mentioned b4, MU is in trouble partly b/c its alumni don't return to serve the school. The admission committee has been told to admit those who are more likely to teach b/c there's a higher chance that those individuals will actually teach at MU (especially since private schools tend to be more selective and are less likely to give MU grads a job at their place). Next, if the interviewer inquires about your family, be sure to mention that you have a significant part of your family residing in Missouri, and that you'd like to someday raise a family here too, some place near Columbia in particular. They know that if you're gonna be teaching, and living near Columbia, then its not far-fetched to assume that MU's the place where you'll be doing it. Furthermore, regardless of which branch of medicine you're thinking about going into, tell them primary care is what interests you most. Apparently, MU is nationally ranked by US News and World Report as one of the top primary care institutions (don't be too impressed, this is a category that the more well known schools simply don't care about b/c it means nothing in the way of receiving grant money. One glimpse at the rankings, and you'll know that the more competitive schools rank right where they should when grant money is involved). But anyway, since this ranking is MU's one (and only) claim to pseudo-fame, the administration would like to hang on to it. So they wanna continue to recruit applicants who are interested in primary medicine. So this is another point you have to allude to during your interview. It doesn't matter if you'll be going into neurosurgery, they'll pass you right up if it means losing that ranking. This is the one thing that has allowed them to avoid scrutiny by the state. If they're constantly churning out doctors who serve the rural community w/ primary care, then the constituents are happy, and that means the lawmakers can continue to claim credit for excellent healthcare during difficult economic times, and that means they constantly get re-elected. So its not in their best interest to blow the whistle on an institution that is literally haning on by its fingernails. In addition to all of this, here's one more very important piece of advice. Admissions may get suspicious if too many applicants start giving the same EXACT responses. So keep in mind the basic underpinnings of my advice, but please please please keep your answers varied. You don't wanna shoot yourself in the foot by sounding like everybody else who walks through their door. Although you do have one thing working for you. My guess is, the majority of interviewees don't visit this website, and thus are not as likely to give the same response as you. And second, if you have to give the same EXACT responses I gave, then do so only if you're boder-line (MCAT = 24, GPA = 3.4 give or take a bit). I can tell you that this advice has indeed gotten in at least 14 other applicants, and by what one of my interviewers told me after the interview, has gotten me accepted as well. I know that it works period. There's no maybe's about it. But please keep the details of your answers varied. If you've scored high on the MCATs and have a high GPA, you have more room to take a chance w/ responses that are more and more removed from the advice that I gave here b/c you'll likely be accepted based on your scores (at MU or some other institution); however, as I mentioned, if you're borderline, I would strongly recommend that you stick to the advice that I've given here. Why am I giving you advice that no one else is willing to? I've applied to 15 schools, have interviewed at 8 already (including my 1st choice school), and thus far, have been invited to interview at 3 of the remaining 7. I don't mean to brag, but I'll probably be accepted to one of the other schools, and I'll opt for one of those choices. That means I won't be attending MU, and so I'm not hurting my chances by helping someone who is border-line. And I would definitely encourage others who are in my shoes. Please, if you KNOW that you won't have to resort to attending your back-up school, then help someone who does have to resort to that. After all, we'll all be doctors one day, and our profession is based more on cooperation than competition. Be competitive when you have to, but when its not warranted, then cooperate other future doctors.
-
Everyone there tried to make me comfortable and were very laid back and informal. This was my first interview, so I was really nervous and blew the first interview anyway. However, because there are two interviews, I could redeem myself on the second one. Don't sweat this one, and you'll probably like the school more after you leave.
-
Overall it wasn't stressful and I enjoyed it.
-
The interviews weren't very stressful, but it was hard to get a feel for whether they liked me or not.
-
I found the attitudes of the administration to be patronizing. I found the academician, who believes in the PBL curriculum at MU, to be out-of-date with the information he provided me in answer to my questions. The clinician, who was very personable and asked excellent questions, did not believe in the PBL format, which was telling. (Don't get me wrong--MU does get excellent results with this format and they do produce good doctors, as well.) The alumni I met with from MU was kind of a "cold fish". I wouldn't have wanted him for my doctor. All in all, I went in really wanting to like the place. It was my top choice. I left knowing that MU was not the school for me.
-
This was a great interview experience it was very relaxed and most of the question came directly from my application.
-
I enjoyed the interview quite a bit. I knew a lot about Mizzou going in, and it was my number one choice from the start.
-
Generally good. I've moved the school up on my list of choices.
-
The most entertaining interviews I've had. It felt like I was sitting down with friends and chatting...they made me feel completely at ease.
-
The school did not impress me at all, read my comments below.
-
The interviews were very conversational. They were open file and they asked many questions about my AMCAS app. It was as relaxing as possible for an interview. I considered this one of my "safe" schools, if there is such a thing. After the interview, I consider this one of my top choices. The students seemed very relaxed and happy.