SDN Logo
 
 

University of Missouri School of Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Columbia, MO

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 27% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
7.7
Good

Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.

Based on 426 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools cover topics such as leadership style, handling stress, defining success, ethical scenarios, and motivations for pursuing medicine. Additionally, respondents mentioned questions related to their MCAT scores, personal experiences, diversity contributions, healthcare opinions, and family background, with some interviews conducted in an MMI format under a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Missouri School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including preferences on patient interaction, challenges in healthcare, ethical dilemmas like cloning, and hypothetical scenarios on team dynamics and patient care. The interviews seemed to cover personal traits, ethical considerations, and healthcare system perspectives, with no clear pattern suggesting an MMI format or nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Missouri School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including scenarios related to healthcare systems comparison, handling stress, facing inequality, ethical dilemmas, and personal weaknesses. While the questions varied, some responses indicated an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements possibly in place, focusing on assessing critical thinking, ethics, and communication skills.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing their AMCAS and secondary applications, reading school websites, browsing SDN for interview feedback and questions, practicing mock interviews, and staying informed about current healthcare policies and issues. They also emphasized the importance of being confident, treating the interview as a conversation, and knowing their own application well.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendliness and warmth of the staff, students, and interviewers. They also highlighted the school's emphasis on getting to know applicants as individuals, the positive atmosphere of the campus, the innovative PBL curriculum, and the impressive facilities. Suggestions included improving faculty enthusiasm, ensuring student tour guides are engaged, and maintaining a focus on student well-being and balance.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative feedback about mispronounced names, short and rushed interviews, uninterested interviewers, lack of diversity, outdated facilities, disorganized tours, lack of lunch, and high tuition costs. Suggestions included improving interviewer engagement, increasing diversity, updating facilities, providing more comprehensive tours, and addressing financial concerns to enhance the overall applicant experience.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the intense interviewers, the focus on personal qualities over application details, the importance of clinical experience, the lack of diversity in the class, and the ease and low stress of the interview process. Additionally, feedback highlighted the need for preparation on specific topics, the location of the building, parking details, financial aid discussions, and the emphasis on the PBL curriculum.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interview process at the school to be relaxed and conversational. Some mentioned the friendly atmosphere, the emphasis on patient-centered care, and the importance of being genuine in responses. There were mixed feelings about the interviewers, with some finding them welcoming and others feeling indifferent or disappointed.
  • Very relaxed, fun interview
  • i liked the school a lot, presentations were rushed
  • Great school overall, and the interview process is pretty laid back. If you are doing Zoom (virtual) interview, please realize that they monitor you the whole time.
  • There is a moderator in the room, normally an administrative staff who is a non-voting member of the interview committee. They will keep time and intervene if needed. Also, every applicant receives a numeric score for their interview and other portions of the application process, those who rank high enough at the end are extended seat offers.
  • Conversational great interview. Everyone warm and this school is top of my list

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest sending information earlier, extending interview times for a more conversational atmosphere, ensuring bias-free interviewers, spreading out acceptance notifications, offering more engaging facility tours, and making interview days more exciting to showcase the school better. Overall, there is appreciation for the organization of the admissions office and a desire for continued improvement in the recruitment process.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 2-3 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Friends or family or with friends or family.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

Based on the responses provided by the users, the most commonly mentioned hotel is "Stoney Creek Inn".

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

Based on the responses provided, it seems that one user stayed at home for the virtual interview and the other user stayed at a place that was lovely both inside and out, with well-kept public spaces and rooms. Therefore, the place where the second user stayed received more comments.

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2023-24 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average Virtual
2023-24 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A