SDN Logo
 
 

Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Dental Schools | Private Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 24% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about personal strengths and weaknesses, motivations for pursuing dentistry, experiences since graduation, and reasons for changing career paths or majors. Additionally, some respondents mentioned engaging in conversations about their academic backgrounds, extracurricular activities, and future goals, with a few participants experiencing a more casual interview format focused on open dialogue rather than specific questions.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including hypothetical scenarios like choosing who to sit next to on a flight home, describing personal qualities, and reflecting on personal aspirations and challenges. While there were varied questions, some responses hinted at an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements in place, possibly indicating a structured interview process focused on assessing interpersonal skills and ethical decision-making.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine discussed various topics such as explaining bad grades, sharing fears about dental school, discussing personal challenges, and justifying application decisions. While the interview format was conversational for many, some responses indicated traditional questions alongside unique prompts like choosing historical figures to sit next to on a flight home.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by utilizing resources such as the Student Doctor Network (SDN), reviewing their application materials, and conducting mock interviews. Suggestions included researching the school, practicing common interview questions, and engaging in conversations with current students for insights.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the welcoming and friendly atmosphere at the school, including the supportive faculty, happy students, and modern facilities. The laid-back and conversational interview style, along with the emphasis on personality rather than qualifications, was also a common positive highlight mentioned by many applicants.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants were commonly unimpressed by factors such as long waiting times, disorganization during interviews and tours, outdated facilities, lack of interaction with upperclassmen, unenthusiastic or negative student feedback, high tuition costs, and a lack of diversity. Suggestions included improving organization, providing more detailed information about the program and financial aid, enhancing interview experiences, involving upperclassmen in tours, and addressing concerns about facilities and student engagement.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time that the interviews were low-stress and conversational, the day could be long with waits between interviews, and to relax and be themselves during the process. Suggestions included being prepared for a conversational style interview, bringing a shoulder bag instead of a clutch, and being proactive in requesting an earlier interview time if needed.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interview at the school to be very relaxed and laid-back, with friendly staff and a positive atmosphere. Some suggested more structure or earlier interviews, while others mentioned the need for more focused questions and less reliance on file information.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should improve communication and responsiveness, provide better guidance during tours and interviews, and start the process earlier in the day to accommodate out-of-state applicants. They also appreciated the friendly and accommodating nature of the staff but highlighted the importance of being more thorough in getting to know applicants during the interview process.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by airplane to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent between $201 and $300.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel in the responses is "Hampton Inn", with variations such as "Hampton Inn Plantation" and "Hampton Inns".

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

Based on the responses provided, the most comments on where they stayed would be "Beach location it was niceee."

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2024-25 N/A Good In Person
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A