Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.
๐Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 25% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.
Based on 142 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about mandating vaccines, reasons for pursuing medicine, handling ethical dilemmas like patient vaccination and physician misconduct, discussing personal qualities, research experience, leadership skills, and opinions on healthcare policies such as single payer systems. Responses also indicate that some interviews are structured in an MMI format, possibly involving nondisclosure agreements due to the nature of the questions asked.
Students said most interesting question asked at Noorda College of Osteopathic Medicine discussed various scenarios including ethical dilemmas, personal interests, alternate career paths, and hypothetical situations like performing life-saving procedures on unwilling patients. The interview format appears to be an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) as respondents mentioned ethical questions and scenarios, indicating a structured interview process that may involve a nondisclosure agreement.
If you were a physician, what would your perfect day look like when practicing?
Students said most difficult question asked at Noorda College of Osteopathic Medicine discussed scenarios involving medical ethics, challenging moral dilemmas, the use of AI in healthcare, and the potential transition to universal healthcare in the US. Some respondents mentioned scenarios related to lying to patients, defending personal stances on ethical issues, as well as the challenging task of justifying their suitability for acceptance within a brief timeframe. Additionally, references to nondisclosure agreements suggest that the interviews may have been conducted in an MMI format.
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 1 person.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by conducting mock interviews, practicing interview questions, researching the school, utilizing resources like SDN, YouTube, and Dr. Gray's Interview book. Many emphasized the importance of knowing their application well and being prepared for a conversational interview style.
SDN, prepared list of questions likely to be asked. No prep really helped. Interview was extremely conversational and they genuinely wanted to see if the school was a match for me and vice versa.
watched all the faculty videos on FB and took notes, many mock interviews, reviewed my application for potential questions, worked through the questions from the 'Premed Playbook by Dr. Ryan Gray'
Applicants were consistently impressed by the emphasis on early research opportunities, the supportive mentorship provided by faculty, the welcoming and friendly environment, and the stress-free and conversational nature of the interview process. Additionally, the commitment to student success, strong research emphasis, and the innovative approach to medical education stood out as positive aspects of the school.
They have a lot going on. Heavy emphasis on early research opportunities. Mentorship is a big factor.
The environment and people at the school were all so friendly and welcoming. They really care about the students. Research was impressive. Also recently developed building so new technology and structure. Location was amazing, right in the mountains!
The schools mission is exactly what they preach. The vision to change medicine is appealing. Strong research emphasis. Students praise of the staff and curriculum style.
Interviewer (administrative faculty) had clear answers on why they chose to work at this new school and how the school would be doing things differently based on evidence.
Applicants were negatively impressed by strict time constraints during virtual interviews, with limited opportunity for conversation. Many also expressed concerns about the lack of information on research opportunities, high costs, and a perceived lack of warmth or interest from staff. Suggestions include allowing more time for applicants to express themselves and providing more insight into the research opportunities available.
With virtual, they had to stick to a strict 30 min deadline. So I didn't have leeway to make conversation with my interviewer. I would recommend in person if you can. Speaking of strict schedule, they stopped right at 12:30. There was enough time to ask questions, but everything felt a tiny bit rushed.
I didn't feel I had a ton of time to express who I was as an applicant during the interview but I guess they already had a good understanding of that from primary and secondary.
That even though you don't have to go out of state for rotations, you'll be going to do the rotations at the same hospital as students from the University of Utah aka very competitive when it comes time to apply for residency programs there.
flat affect. didn't enjoy the heavy debating, but i understand some schools like to test potential students to see how they handle being questioned and defending their positions, but it still left me feeling a little deflated and less welcome by the school.
Applicants commonly wished they had known about the group activity, the conversational nature of the interview, and potential surprises like unexpected interview formats or questions. It was also suggested to double-check location details for travel arrangements to avoid any last-minute issues.
that i would face so much debating and healthcare policy questions. it wasn't consistent with my experience with faculty and admissions staff at all, so it was a little whiplash-y.
Applicants generally appreciated the friendly staff and low-stress interview environment, with positive remarks about the school, its programs, and the interview experience. Some suggested improvements included offering more time for the 1on1 interview and ensuring interviewers show interest in applicants' personal statements and videos.
Go in person if you can. I like that it's a newer school. But students commented that each year they change the curriculum. Good because they listen to student feedback, but also a sign they might not have everything figured out yet. I think you have to know you like the group studying/pod style learning structure before you commit here. It is a big ask for a school for a student.
Low stress interview and very friendly staff in a safe area, I have pretty high hopes for this school. And the surrounding mountains are gorgeous, fantastic location for the school.
My interviewer didn't seem interested in my personal statement or secondary video. They had a list of pre-prepared questions that they went down the list and didn't allow for much conversation to take place.
i still really like this school and hope my attitude and emotions get better in the coming weeks and would still be ecstatic to get an A. very good videos and presentations leading up to the interview. well organized.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggest providing more time for interviews or reducing the number of questions to allow for more specific interactions with interviewers. They also appreciate the friendly and stress-free interview process and encourage the admissions office to continue their great work.
More time for the interview or fewer questions. That way, we can ask specific questions to the interviewer.
Stayed at an airbnb in Springfield, Utah it was very close to the school and cheaphttps://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1182603371722403048?search_mode=regular_search&check_in=2025-01-16&check_out=2025-01-18&source_impression_id=p3_1736446486_P3XwwlRtnjA9XxSU&previous_page_section_name=1000&federated_search_id=06bd17f4-0bd4-4b06-8fbb-46ddfd520ba9
Solid hotel, not fancy but nice and clean. You also get a really solid discount if you use the Noorda corporate link to book your room, and the view of the mountains is a big plus.