SDN Logo
 
 

University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Jackson, MS

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 26% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.3
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 240 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about personal characteristics, ethical dilemmas, reasons for pursuing medicine, strengths and weaknesses, future goals in medicine, academic performance, study habits, interests and hobbies, and decision-making processes. Some respondents also mentioned questions related to Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) format, involving scenarios like prioritizing patients and discussing ethical principles, which may have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting question asked at University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including ethical dilemmas, personal values in healthcare, and hypothetical scenarios like being trapped in a blizzard. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) due to the variety of questions, and respondents may have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement based on the diverse nature of the inquiries.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics including ethical dilemmas, personal values, integrity, and scenarios involving teamwork and patient care. Many responses referenced an MMI format or nondisclosure agreements, indicating a diverse set of challenging questions were posed, such as choosing between being a ball or a glove, handling ethical dilemmas, and reflecting on personal weaknesses and achievements.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing their AMCAS application, reading this website for common questions, and practicing mock interviews. Many also utilized resources like SDN forums, consulted with current medical students, and stayed informed on current health issues to feel more confident and ready for their interviews.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were consistently impressed by the welcoming and friendly atmosphere at the school, where everyone from staff to faculty to students made them feel comfortable and at ease. They appreciated the low-stress interviews, engaging conversations, and the enthusiasm of interviewers and tour guides, as well as the impressive facilities and hands-on clinical experiences offered.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the lack of enthusiasm during campus tours, outdated facilities, poor parking options, limited diversity, and unengaging interviewers. Suggestions included enhancing campus tours, updating facilities, improving parking arrangements, increasing diversity, and ensuring interviewers focus more on the applicants.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known to not be overly stressed, as the interview process at UMC was described as welcoming and laid back. They also recommended wearing comfortable shoes, being prepared to ask questions, and not overthinking the process.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interview experience at UMC to be positive and relaxed, with interviewers focusing on getting to know them rather than grilling them. They appreciated the conversational nature of the interviews and the friendly atmosphere created by both interviewers and staff.
  • It was a good experience.
  • Good school and program. Definitely top 3 for me.
  • MMI style interview
  • Hotty Toddy, bros and ladybros.
  • Its about as relaxed an interview as you'll get. Although its impossible, try not to stress about it. Think of it like a series of conversations, not a life-or-death interview process.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants overwhelmingly praised the admissions office for their friendliness, professionalism, and helpfulness, encouraging them to continue their great work without making any specific suggestions for improvement.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Des Moines International Airport (DSM)
No responses

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel is Cabot Lodge.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

N/A

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good In Person
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 N/A Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A