Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include describing vaccine schedules for animals, opinions on animal research, ethical scenarios like handling cases of financial constraints for treatment, and questions on personal integrity such as dealing with cheating or views on terminal surgeries. Some respondents may have experienced an MMI format interview with a possible nondisclosure agreement in place.
Describe a typical vaccine schedule for a new puppy.
Vaccine protocol for cats (frustrating, since they had my file and knew my only small animal experience was at a shelter). Also asked about vaccine protocol for horses (better, since that is where most of my experience was).
Students said most interesting question asked at Oregon State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed ethical dilemmas in veterinary practice, legislation regarding animal welfare, and handling differing opinions on sensitive topics. These questions likely reflect the MMI format, with potential nondisclosure agreements in place for confidentiality reasons.
How do you feel about using live animals for surgical practice during your courses?
Students said most difficult question asked at Oregon State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed handling application "blemishes," working with difficult individuals, ethical considerations of pet healthcare expenses versus global poverty, and justifying academic readiness despite past grades, indicating a focus on personal experiences, ethical dilemmas, and academic preparedness. These varied questions suggest a comprehensive evaluation process potentially in a Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format, which may involve a nondisclosure agreement given the diversity of challenging inquiries.
They were really interested in having me explain how I overcame some of the "blemishes" on my application.
Asked how I felt about going into vet med, when people spend so much on healthcare for their pets in the U.S. while you can feed a person in a third world country for a dollar a day. This one just threw me off.
After seeing that I had a couple not so good grades in O-chem and physics one interviewer asked me to convince them that I would be able to handle the rigors of vet school. (This one just threw me off guard because my grades for my last two years of undergrad were really good and I didn't get asked about grades at all in my other interviews)
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by practicing with online MMI questions, reviewing their applications, seeking out sample questions online, researching the school, and discussing strategies with counselors or professionals in the field. It is recommended to utilize online resources, review application materials, and seek advice from professionals to prepare effectively for interviews.
Read practice questions I found online, reviewed my vmcas and supplemental apps, discussed interview strategies and how to answer difficult questions with career counselor from my undergrad
Applicants were positively impressed by the attentive and interactive interviewers, as well as the friendly and helpful staff in the admissions office. They also appreciated the welcoming atmosphere, beautiful facilities, and the opportunity to engage with current students, suggesting a high level of personal attention and a supportive community.
Each interviewer listened closely, asked their own questions, and responded to your own questions. They were all very relaxed and interested in you as a person.
The interviewers and the office staff were extremely friendly, the facilities were beautiful, and the students I talked to were open and excited about the program.
Admissions secretary/coordinator was always very helpful and quick to respond. Tour guide was enthusiastic and answered lots of questions...she also took me to dinner with some other current students. Had a horse handling class for interviewees to attend (weekly class designed to help students unfamiliar with horses become more comfortable).
There were a group of mostly first year students near the entrance that you could sit and talk with before the interview. Also the actual interview environment was pretty relaxed and friendly.
that a student was willing to give my mom and I a tour right after my interview so I wouldn't have to wait until the one at 6pm (my interview was at 9am). She was very nice : )
Applicants expressed frustration with intimidating interviewers, lack of expected student interaction, and vague or off-putting questions. Suggestions include ensuring consistency in interviewer behavior and providing the promised resources for applicants.
One of the interviewers came off as really intimidating. I was surprised because I had heard from many people that Oregon's interview process was extremely relaxed and low-key.
Had been told there would be students (and possibly a dog) waiting in the lobby to answer questions, but no one was there--perhaps because my interview was at the end of the day. Hard to get pamphlets, etc. when researching schools.
There weren't any students to talk to when I first got there, one interviewer kind of seemed out to get you, one of them gave a really vague answer when I asked about their specialty. One interviewer asked if I used animals in my senior thesis, had he read the title of my thesis or anything it would have been clear that I didn't, which I found a little frustrating since it was an open-interview.
Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time that the interview process would be more relaxed than anticipated, that specific interviewers would be cold, and that there might be a "good cop, bad cop" dynamic. They also mentioned the importance of not stressing excessively and being aware of the interview format.
Applicants commonly mentioned that they were surprised by the lack of a "good cop bad cop" dynamic, appreciated knowing about the math question in advance, and recommended not stressing about it. They also reassured future candidates that the math question is simple and not a cause for worry, and the outcome of the interview may not reflect how they felt it went.
Although I had heard that they would play "good cop bad cop", they didn't! There was a math problem, which I was glad I knew about beforehand.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Many applicants suggested that the admissions office should make the supplemental application process electronic for convenience. Additionally, they recommended improving the interview process by ensuring a more welcoming and inclusive environment for interviewees.