Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.
๐Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 10% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did well.
Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.
Based on 124 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
Based on the responses provided, the most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about OAT scores and preparation methods, experiences with individuals of different perspectives, reasons for choosing specific schools, discrepancies between academic performance and standardized test scores, interest in specialties, decision-making processes, career motivations, strengths and weaknesses, and instances of making and learning from mistakes. These questions do not reference an MMI format or nondisclosure agreements.
What made you choose the schools you applied to? How did you study for the OAT? Explain the discrepancy between course grade and OAT grade. Are you interested in any specialties?
Students said most interesting question asked at The Ohio State University College Of Optometry discussed various scenarios requiring empathy and understanding different perspectives, as well as questions about their fit for the school and impressions of the optometry career. These responses indicate a mix of personal, situational, and career-oriented inquiries commonly encountered during the interview process, possibly in an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements in place.
Tell me about a time you put yourself in someone else's shoes and acted with empathy.
Students said the most difficult question asked at The Ohio State University College Of Optometry discussed a range of topics, including adapting to AI advances, handling interactions with diverse perspectives, showcasing leadership qualities, reflecting on mistakes and poor decisions, discussing strengths and weaknesses, and explaining optometry-related legislation or political issues. Additionally, references to MMI format, Multiple Mini Interview, and nondisclosure agreements suggest that respondents may have faced such a format and confidentiality restrictions during their interviews.
How can optometry adapt to new advances in AI that could do optometrists' job for them?
Your OAT scores are shocking. Usually we expect gpa and test scores to be similar. What happened? (I knew this would be asked and never figured out how to explain myself)
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a in a group interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Many applicants prepared for their interviews by utilizing the Student Doctor Network (SDN) forums, practicing with mock interview questions, and researching the school thoroughly online to be well-prepared for potential questions. They also focused on reviewing common interview questions and formulating thoughtful responses to showcase their qualifications and suitability for the program.
I just looked over the Interview Feedback information on the SDN and made up potential questions they can ask. I typed them up with potential answers. I didn't memorize them, but it really helped that I kind of new what I was going to say.
I thought a lot about why I was a good candidate for the school. I prepared answers to difficult questions that I knew would be asked about weaknesses in my application.
Applicants were consistently impressed by the welcoming and friendly atmosphere of the school, the professionalism and kindness of the staff and faculty, the modern facilities, and the emphasis on personal interactions during the interview process. Many applicants also appreciated the school's location within a larger university campus and the opportunities for social engagement and academic excellence.
Beautiful school, new facilities, impressive academics, friendly staff
The interviewers were really kind and experienced so it made the interview flow very naturally. Throughout our time they would say positive things about my answers. They also gave me so much time to talk and answered my questions fully.
The professionalism and commitment to excellence is very evident at OSU. They are really going to prepare you well and send you out as a leader in the field upon completion of your studies.
Interviewing Drs. were very conversational. Although my performance determined the direction of my life, I was able to remain calm and collected by the warm atmosphere. The new lecture hall is very nice.
I was picked up from the airport by a current student, attended an actual class, ate lunch with the student, stayed at the EYE house which is an optometry fraternity, so many people were very helpful.
My favorite part was that I met tons of students and faculty. Everybody was more than willing to help me out and were so friendly. I even got to play fusball in the student lounge with some 3rd year students.
Applicants commonly expressed concerns about campus safety, the length and organization of the interview day, outdated facilities, lack of thoroughness in tours, and a desire for more engaging and informative experiences during the interview process. Suggestions included improving safety measures, updating facilities, enhancing tour experiences, and providing more opportunities for interaction with current students.
The interview was set up to feel a bit intimidating- I was seated at the top of a huge "O" shaped table, with two faculty on each side, so that I had to turn in my chair to directly face each person. In addition, I spent a lot of time waiting around (almost 2 hours total) while the other applicants were interviewed. For a large portion of that waiting time, there were no student ambassadors or anyone to chat with, it just felt very awkward.
I didn't feel I learned that much about the school while i was there. They showed a video about the business management program and that was all they really told us. The tour wasn't as thorough as some of the other interviews.
I think the school needs some more remodeling. Also, the interview was extremely casual and I was disappointed that I couldn't showcase more of my knowledge. I did not feel confident afterwards when I was told ''based on your gpa, we'll be putting you on hold... this is a good thing! you aren't rejected'' Yea.
I wish they fed us lunch like most other places, because you can really get to know the students at the school and find out so much information by just eating with some optometry students.
Applicants commonly wished they had known to bring extra comfortable shoes for long interview days, be prepared for a drawn-out schedule with periods of downtime, and to craft alternate stories for interview questions. They also emphasized the importance of being relaxed and conversational during the interview, having questions prepared, and the advantage of applying earlier due to rolling admissions processes.
Bring extra shoes for the tour! I thought I would be fine in flats but I have so many blisters
That there would be a lot of downtime during the day when we were just waiting, although the interview day itself was very drawn out. I arrived at 8:15 and didn't leave until almost 3:00.
I wish I had thought of more questions to ask the second year student that led the campus tour in the afternoon. I also wish I had known that there really is no reason to be nervous; the interview process is not as scary as I expected.
That they would ask me questions about what was said in my letters of recommendation. (i.e. One of your writers said such and such, how did you deal with that?)
The interview was more based on ''likability'' factor rather than knowledge of the profession. I assume that the admissions committee has determined who they are looking for and after reading personal statements/applications they already know your interest and I think they were just trying to see if you can present yourself professionally, confidently, and believable as a future optometrist.
Applicants generally provided positive feedback about their interview experience, expressing appreciation for the welcoming atmosphere, faculty, and resources of the school. Some suggested improvements such as making the interview process less intimidating, offering more comprehensive campus tours, and providing clearer communication about decision timelines.
It was a really positive and convincing experience. Because of the interview day, it is my top choice currently.
The faculty and student ambassadors were all very kind, the resources of the school are great, but I did not like how the interview was set up to feel very intimidating with the layout.
I was the only person interviewing that day and I was accepted 5-10 minutes after the interview. Be forewarned, the tours and lunch occurred before the actual interview.
I went to a Friday interview. Apparently if you go on a Monday they do a ''full'' interview where you sit in on a class, take a tour of the entire campus, etc. I would recommend this b/c I left feeling I didn't really learn a lot about the school
Anyone reading this: APPLY EARLY!!! This is a HUGE advantage. If possible, you should take your OAT by June and turn in your application on the very first day it becomes available.
The interview was relaxed and they even gave me some water to drink during the interview. Also, they give out the nicest pens of all the schools I interviewed at.
The interveiw was extremely laid back. There were three of us interviewing that day and I enjoyed getting to know the other applicants. I had it arranged to shadow some first year classes in the morning and tour the university. After lunch we all met on the 4th floor of the Starling-Loving building and watched a 20 minute presentation on OSUs optometric business curriculum. Then we rotated through a tour of the facilities, a talk with the financial aid guy, and the actual interview.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants overwhelmingly praised the admissions office for being welcoming and kind, with minimal suggestions for improvement. A common suggestion was to conduct interviews at the beginning of the day, and to be more transparent with students about the reasons for their categorization.