SDN Logo
 
 

Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Columbus, OH

Veterinary Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 16% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.4
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 423 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools revolve around the motivations for pursuing veterinary medicine, personal experiences that shaped the decision, leadership and conflict resolution skills, handling stressful situations, discussing global issues in veterinary medicine, and specific scenarios related to the field. Some respondents mentioned being asked a wide range of questions, while others highlighted the MMI format with potential nondisclosure agreements due to the nature of the interview structure.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting questions asked at Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed scenarios related to leadership, conflict management, and ethical dilemmas. The interviews may have been in a Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format, as several responses included detailed scenario-based questions and could have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including anatomy scenarios, conflict management, current events impacting veterinary medicine, global veterinary issues, leadership qualities, and ethical dilemmas. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on responses that referenced scenario questions and a variety of challenging inquiries, which could suggest respondents were under a nondisclosure agreement.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Many applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing Student Doctor Network (SDN) questions, practicing mock interviews, researching the school, and discussing with current students. They also emphasized the importance of knowing their application well, practicing answers to common questions, and staying up-to-date on current events in veterinary medicine.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendliness and welcoming nature of the faculty, staff, and students at the school, as well as the well-organized interview process. Many applicants appreciated the opportunities to interact with current students, the inclusion of students in the interview process, and the relaxed and laid-back atmosphere during the interviews and pre-interview events.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about interviewers lacking follow-up questions, not engaging in a conversational manner, and not showing interest beyond scripted questions. Suggestions included providing more guidance on the interview format, ensuring interviewers are more personable, and minimizing wait times between activities.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Most applicants wished they had known ahead of time that the interview would be more laid back and conversational, rather than an interrogation. They also mentioned the importance of relaxing, being themselves, and not stressing too much during the process.

What are your general comments?

Applicants commonly shared feedback on the need to practice strategies to deal with nervousness, the importance of showing personality during interviews, and experiences with varying levels of conversational engagement from interviewers. Overall, they expressed positive impressions of the school, its interview process, and the friendliness of staff and current students.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest that the admissions office should review and potentially improve the interview process, specifically addressing concerns about organization and communication. Overall, most applicants appreciate the welcoming environment and effective communication from the admissions office and suggest they should continue their positive efforts.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 7+ hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent between $101 and $200.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel that users stayed in is Fairfield Inn and Suites.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Poor N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A