SDN Logo
 
 

The Ohio State University College of Dentistry Interview Feedback Summary

Columbus, OH

Dental Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 13% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about leadership experiences, career choices outside of dentistry, challenges expected in dentistry, volunteer experiences, personal interests, motivations for pursuing dentistry, setbacks faced and overcome, self-motivation instances, family background in dentistry, and reasons for choosing a specific dental school. Some respondents mentioned a discussion format without specific questions, possibly indicating an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) setup with potential non-disclosure agreements in place.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at The Ohio State University College of Dentistry discussed a wide range of topics, including ethical dilemmas, personal attributes for success in dentistry, future goals, and the impact of volunteer experiences. While some responses indicated a variety of questions, the absence of specific mentions regarding MMI or nondisclosure agreements suggests a traditional interview format without restrictions on sharing interview questions.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at The Ohio State University College of Dentistry discussed various topics including giving bad news to patients, handling conflicts, future challenges in dentistry, ethical scenarios, volunteer experiences' relevance, and self-motivation situations. Some responses hinted at an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements, while other interviewees described a casual and conversational tone with questions focusing on personal motivations for dentistry and observations in the field.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at another location.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing the school's website, practicing with mock interviews, and utilizing resources like Student Doctor Network (SDN) for sample questions. They also emphasized the importance of being well-rested, dressing professionally, and engaging in a genuine conversation during the interview.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and enthusiasm of the staff, faculty, and students at Ohio State University. They appreciated the well-organized interview process, the school spirit, and the emphasis on making applicants feel valued and welcomed throughout the experience. Suggestions included maintaining a balance between impressing applicants and providing an authentic representation of the school.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the older facilities, particularly in the pre-clinical labs, and the lack of modern equipment such as digital radiography. Many also mentioned a desire for more transparency about the school and its programs during the interview process, as well as a need for updates and improvements in various areas of the school.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time to relax and not be nervous, as the interviews were described as conversational and laid-back. They also mentioned being surprised by the speed-dating format of the interviews and the need for comfortable shoes for the tour, as well as the quality of the food and accommodations provided during the interview process.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally expressed positive feedback about the interview experience at Ohio State University, highlighting the friendly and welcoming environment, the conversational interview style, and the efforts made by the school to showcase its strengths through various activities and presentations. Some applicants mentioned areas for improvement, such as outdated technology and concerns about board preparation, but overall, the majority viewed the school favorably and felt well-received during the interview process.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest having more faculty members conducting interviews, providing a better school tour, elaborating more on the school's curriculum and opportunities, and improving the interview environment by reducing the number of people in each room. Additionally, some applicants express discomfort with the short interview format and praise the program's welcoming and people-centered approach.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 2-3 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average In Person
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ N/A N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ N/A N/A