SDN Logo
 
 

University of Oklahoma College of Dentistry Interview Feedback Summary

Oklahoma City, OK

Dental Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 27% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
7.8
Good

Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.

Based on 176 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools based on user responses include inquiries about personal experiences, motivations for pursuing dentistry, handling ethical dilemmas, manual dexterity skills, and leadership roles. Some respondents also mentioned being asked about specific scenarios, such as dealing with conflict in a dental practice or addressing unethical situations, while others highlighted the importance of volunteer work and extracurricular activities in shaping their future as dentists.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Oklahoma College of Dentistry discussed a wide range of topics including personal inspirations, overcoming challenges, ethical scenarios, and unique qualities. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) as some responses hinted at nondisclosure agreements, while other questions focused on personal interests, ethical dilemmas, and reasons for pursuing dentistry.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult questions asked at University of Oklahoma College of Dentistry discussed a variety of topics, including handling stress, ethical scenarios in clinic, academic challenges due to disabilities, and personal motivations for pursuing dentistry. The interviews may have been in an MMI format, as some responses alluded to nondisclosure agreements, while common themes revolved around personal experiences, ethical dilemmas, and reasons for choosing the school.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 40 - 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing their application materials, practicing with mock interviews, researching the school extensively, and utilizing resources like SDN and school websites to anticipate and answer potential questions effectively. Suggestions included practicing responses with friends or family, reviewing commonly asked questions, and ensuring a good night's sleep and confidence on the day of the interview.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were positively impressed by the friendly and welcoming atmosphere during the interviews, the early clinical experience offered, the updated facilities and technology, the conversational and comfortable interview process, and the genuine interest of the admissions committee in getting to know them. Additionally, they appreciated the small class sizes, the professionalism and friendliness of the interviewers, and the overall supportive and down-to-earth environment of the school.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about lack of detailed information provided during tours, outdated facilities, limited technology visibility, and a perceived lack of inclusivity and welcoming atmosphere. Suggestions include enhancing transparency during tours, updating facilities, showcasing technology, and fostering a more inclusive environment for all applicants.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wish they had known about the lack of food provided during the interview day, the interview structure, the importance of researching the school, and the group interview with dental students. Additionally, they recommend arriving early, wearing a suit, and being aware of the ranking system based on GPA and DAT scores used by the admissions committee.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interviewers to be friendly and approachable, with a focus on getting to know them personally. Some expressed a wish for more information about the school, while others appreciated the welcoming atmosphere and positive experience.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest providing more detailed information during presentations beyond what is available online, offering a presentation or handout with school statistics, and giving out folders with information instead of just printouts of PowerPoint slides. Additionally, some applicants recommend starting the admissions process earlier to accommodate students with other offers.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Will Rogers World Airport (OKC)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

Based on the responses provided by the users, it seems that the most comments were about the fact that the accommodation has valet parking only.

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2023-24 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor In Person
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great In Person
2022-23 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average In Person
2022-23 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Poor In Person
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A