Most respondents felt negatively about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as high stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
π¬ Interview Questions βΌ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
Most commonly, interviewees were asked to describe their research interests multiple times across different interviews. Additionally, candidates were often invited to ask questions themselves.
Describe your research interests. (I was asked this 6 different times in 6 different interviews).
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaβs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What are your comments on where you stayed?
No responses
β Interview Preparation and Impressions βΌ
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was unfriendly.
No responses
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was unresponsive.
No responses
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by familiarizing themselves with the faculty's work, revisiting their personal statement, and studying the institution's website. These steps helped them feel more confident and informed during the interview process.
Read some of the faculty's articles, re-read my statement, studied the website.
Applicants were positively impressed by the availability and kindness of grad students, the well-informed and enthusiastic faculty, as well as the warm and professional interactions with faculty and staff. They also appreciated the convenient campus location, fully funded program, low living expenses, and overall positive atmosphere at the university.
All of the grad students were super available and kind, and the faculty were very well-informed and enthusiastic.
Before my visit, I had lengthy phone ''interviews'' with several faculty & admin staff; they were all very warm and professional. Nice facilities, faculty & students were friendly, students seemed relatively happy (albeit tired & stressed). Students are fully funded for however long they're in the program. Pitt's campus is very convenient, med school & local hospitals are within a couple blocks. Pittsburgh is much nicer than I expected. Living expenses in the area are low enough that students can live off of their stipends.
Applicants commonly expressed negativity towards the exhaustion and intense workload experienced by students, the lack of breaks and rushed schedule during interviews, and the impersonal feel of the interview process. Suggestions included providing more opportunities for rest, allowing time for meaningful interactions with current students, and improving the overall experience to make it less stressful and more welcoming.
The students appeared simply exhausted...there is more coursework than average in their curriculum and they all seemed kind of defeated. Also, the days were extremely long and it was difficult to enjoy any social functions at the end of the day, even though they were supposed to be for "fun."
NO breaks between interviews - not even time to walk from one to the next. Barely had time to eat lunch. Formal interviews with grad students felt contrived/awkward & I didn't really get to ask them questions. The whole day felt like a cattle-call audition; tons of applicants and a very rushed schedule made me feel like I should have been wearing a number instead of a name tag. Had to share a hotel room with another applicant. (Not Pitt's fault: flight was delayed the night before and I got in so late that I only got about 5 hours of sleep).
Applicants commonly wished they had known about the extended time commitment required for the program, including a minimum of 6 years on campus and clinical training. They also expressed surprise at the level of clinical training compared to other programs, highlighting the importance of researching program specifics beforehand.
The program takes *at least* 6 years on campus, plus the internship. There is a lot more clinical training than I expected (more than other programs where I interviewed).
Applicants commonly expressed disappointment in the impersonal and rushed nature of their visit, contrasting with initial positive communications. Despite feeling a lack of personal connection, many acknowledged the friendliness of staff and the perceived strength of the program.
My experience at Pitt didn't feel nearly as personal or welcoming as my pre-visit communications with faculty/staff. I was disappointed by the all-around impersonal feel. I didn't feel like I got a good feel for the program because we were so rushed all day long. But, everyone was friendly and it seems like a strong program.