SDN Logo
 
 

Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences College of Osteopathic Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Yakima, WA

Osteopathic Medical Schools | Private Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 40% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools based on user responses include inquiries about preparing for medical school, experiences of feeling left out, MCAT preparation and retaking, ethics scenarios like observing a colleague taking medication, clarifications on application details, personal attributes, healthcare system improvements, reasons for pursuing medicine, and challenges in the field. An overwhelming number of responses mentioned an MMI format with scenarios on various topics and a standardized list of questions, which may have been accompanied by a nondisclosure agreement during the interview process.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences College of Osteopathic Medicine discussed a variety of topics including healthcare improvement in rural areas, work-life balance, ethical scenarios challenging confidence, handling religious restrictions in patient care, and parental responses to child injuries. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) as some responses hinted at nondisclosure agreements due to the nature of the questions posed.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences College of Osteopathic Medicine discussed a wide range of topics including challenges to the body-mind connection, retaking specific classes, undesirable specialties, explaining application details, and ethical scenarios. Some respondents mentioned a nondisclosure agreement possibly related to an MMI format, where questions on health care changes, delivering difficult news, weaknesses, and attracting physicians to underserved areas were also highlighted as challenging.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by practicing with family, using Student Doctor Network (SDN) resources, reviewing personal statements, participating in mock interviews, researching the school, and staying updated on healthcare-related news. Some also engaged in morality discussions, set up their interview space to reflect their personality, and exercised regularly to prepare.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendly and welcoming atmosphere at the school, with staff and students creating a family-like environment. They appreciated the high level of commitment from faculty and staff, as well as the emphasis on student success. The facilities, small class sizes, community support, and dedication to providing quality education were also highlighted as positive aspects that stood out.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions about the interview structure, feeling that it was chaotic, did not allow for equal participation, and affected their ability to make a good impression. Additionally, concerns were raised about the school's location, lack of diversity among faculty, limited study space, and the perception of staff and faculty attitudes. Suggestions included implementing a more structured and fair interview process, addressing concerns openly, and improving the overall organization and environment of the school.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the relaxed and informal nature of the interview process, the potential for traditional questions alongside free-for-all discussions, and the importance of arriving on time and prepared. Suggestions included to relax, be prepared for unexpected delays, and familiarize oneself with the interview location to avoid last-minute stress.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally expressed mixed feelings about the interview experience at the school, with some feeling nervous and not fully engaged, while others found the staff and faculty welcoming and the campus impressive. Many mentioned the school's potential for growth and dedication to rural medicine in the Pacific Northwest, but concerns were raised about high tuition costs and the school's location. Overall, there was a range of opinions from feeling excited about potentially attending to being unsure about the school's current standing.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest updating the admissions portal to be more user-friendly and modern, providing a structured interview format for better engagement and comfort, and ensuring timely communication, especially regarding interview schedules and online payments.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 7+ hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Yakima Air Terminal (McAllister Field) (YKM)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2024-25 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2020-21 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2015-16 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A