Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 18% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
Based on the responses provided, the most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the applicant's motivation for pursuing optometry, interests, hobbies, how they handle stress, and their personal attributes as perceived by others. Additionally, some respondents mentioned an MMI format and a nondisclosure agreement, indicating that questions were standard but required confidentiality.
We actually signed a confidentiality statement saying we wouldn't share details of our interview and questions, but the questions were all normal, nothing out of the blue.
Students said the most interesting question asked at Pacific University College Of Optometry discussed various topics such as identifying stress in others, thoughts on organic food, essential characteristics for optometrists, preferred learning style, recent movies watched, travel desires, and hypothetical scenarios. Additionally, some respondents mentioned being part of an MMI format interview which required signing a nondisclosure agreement, while others highlighted questions focusing on personal attributes and ethical decision-making without any tricks or specific content disclosure.
How would you identify somebody whose stressed and how would you suggest they manage it?
I'm not going to get specific on the questions, but I will say that there were no ''tricks'' and the questions were very basic in nature. They just asked questions to get to know you as a person and student. Interviews are closed file so be sure to bring up your extracirriculars and activities because the interviewers know nothing about you!
Students said most difficult question asked at Pacific University College Of Optometry discussed a variety of topics including ethical dilemmas, personal qualities, reasons for pursuing optometry, and dealing with challenging situations in academics or life. While some mentioned specific questions like naming a song that describes them or explaining their commitment to podiatry, the overall focus seemed to be on assessing candidates' values, experiences, and problem-solving abilities rather than posing overly technical or specialized inquiries.
What qualities do you think an optometrist should possess? And which of these characteristics do you think you possess already? Which do you not yet possess?
(general theme of the question... I can't remember the exact wording) Think back to a class that you had difficulty in. Why were you having problems? What did you do (or could you have done) to overcome that difficulty?
Most respondents had an interview of 40 - 50 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by utilizing resources such as the Student Doctor Network (SDN), practicing with mock interviews, and researching potential questions to strengthen their responses. Many also reviewed their application materials, reached out to current students for insights, and familiarized themselves with the school's website to demonstrate a genuine interest in the program.
I looked up a lot of questions from SDN, read some tips on interviews and ask current optometry students about the interviews to help make my answers stronger.
Read Interview feedback on this site, prepare the standard questions: why optometry?, why this school?, strengths/weaknesses, browse the Pacific website and learn about the school.
I mostly just relaxed, got a lot of sleep, and made sure that I knew what I wanted to say. I practiced talking to myself in the mirror with what I would answer to some basic questions.
Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendly and supportive atmosphere at the school, where faculty, staff, and students were described as welcoming and enthusiastic. They also appreciated the beautiful campus, strong sense of community, and emphasis on student success and well-being. Some applicants highlighted the opportunity to interact with current students and faculty members, as well as the quality of facilities and resources available.
The campus was beautiful and the students were very friendly. Staff really seem to care that their students not only do well academically, but succeed in their life goals as well.
Facilities are described by others to be shabby, but i don't think that is the case and i do believe MANY students on this site engage in "school wars". the facilities were not BRILLIANT AND SPECTACULAR, but they are MORE THAN ADEQUATE to receive a podiatric medical education.
Admissions staff were extremely helpful and seemed very genuine in their approach in making our day very structured. David Martin was out sick, so another member of the admissions staff helped us. It was long and they showed us as much as possible including any new facilities they might have built.
Also, they are not "affiliated" with Temple, but rather a PART of Temple U, which I think is great seeing as how TU is a school that is actively improving its reputation.
The students who talked with us at lunch were very professional, as well as the students who we met in the clinical setting.
All the faculty and students are really there to help each other and us there for the interview. Everyone was happy to see you there, learn about you and answer any questions you had.
The honesty of the staff, faculty and students. The incredible facilities! The amazing degree of professionalism from the student body. The profs are fantastic. The students and the profs have great relationships. The school is very student-centered. The program is geared towards specifically meeting your goals. Everyone is so nice!
The family-oriented atmosphere and small ''hometown'' feel to Forest Grove. It was not very intimidating and all of the faculty were very friendly and enthusastic.
Pretty much everything, I loved Pacific. The most impressive thing for me was that I got to talk to faculty and the dean like they were my friends or colleagues, not as if I was subordinate.
Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the outdated or small facilities, particularly the clinical facilities located far from campus, and the lack of exposure to those facilities during the interview process. Suggestions included providing more information or opportunities to see all clinical facilities and ensuring interviewers are more engaging and conversational.
Not very conversational, Interviewers are constantly writing your responses. Completely closed, I wish the interviewers had at least read my essays.
We only were able to see 1/5 of the clinical facilities because the other 4 clinics were not located near campus. I wanted to see what they were like. Also, this means that the students have to commute more to go to the clinics.
clinic was busy but not overwhelmingly busy, bashing of the NYCPM program, you have to apply for scholarships your 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years, they are definitely dorms
The clinicals director was very abrasive and tried to sugar-coat the fact that the clinics that actually had patients coming through at a steady pace were all located in Portland . . . an hour away. The facilities seemed a bit small.
Small facilities, clinical program presenter spent too much time defending the clinical program... Overall though I think the externships make up for that and great docs definately come out of the program.
Forest Grove itself is small, but fortunately Portland is a short drive away!
Campus clinic is very small and looked empty (they do have other clinics throughout the Portland metro area... but you don't get to see them!)
Applicants commonly wished they had known how long the interview day would be and that it was a relaxed environment focused on getting to know them personally. They also suggested bringing specific questions and being prepared for either an intense or laid-back interview experience.
Not to worry because the interview was mainly about getting to know us personally, not drilling us to see what we knew. Also, bring specific questions because they had a student-led question and answer session which was really helpful!
Pacific attempts to accept an equal number of males and females for each class, so with the ratios going the way they are, all males should apply to Pacific since they'll have a great chance of getting in! I didn't see how this isn't discrimination of gender. Shouldn't all have an equal opportunity to be accepted regardless of gender, race, religion, etc?!
Applicants generally found the interview day to be long but well-structured, with a positive overall experience interacting with staff and faculty. They appreciated the laid-back atmosphere, informative sessions, and opportunities to ask questions, although some found certain interview formats to be less relaxed and more challenging.
It was a long interview day, but overall I liked how they scheduled everything.
This school is unique and prestigious. I liked it because of it's proximity to where I live and its strong clinical program but if I was not from around the area, it would not be a top choice for me.
I thought that it was a good experience. For being my first interview, it was very stress-free. I never felt pressured at all. The staff at TUSPM are very pationate about the school, which I feel is a good thing.
I was interviewed by Dr. Newman, who was very frank and honest. He asked me what schools I had applied to, (i think this is pretty common to all the pod schools). He asked my thoughts on temple, he went over some of the things in my file, and said he was impressed with my letters. Most of the conversation I feel was geared towards assessing my personality as opposed to asking redundant questions like "why podiatry"? which every applicant has already answered through applying and an essay. i was asked how committed i am to podiatry.
The interview and the whole day was very informative but a little long. Everyone was laid back and made the interviewers relaxed. All of my questions were answered by the time I had my interview (in the afternoon). There was a question and answer period with just some students so you could ask whatever you wanted and were not being evaluated by any teachers or admission committee members.
The prof and staff member (both on the admissions committee) were incredibly nice. I had a great time during my interview - and we even went over by 10-15 minutes! I was so relaxed and it was really like having a conversation with friends. The entire Interview Day was an awesome way of getting acquainted with the school.
My interview was actually in Canada at the University of Alberta, which was great because it saved me the cost of flying to Oregon. The presentation was excellent and answered almost all of my questions and the interview was very laid back. I felt every comfortable and welcomed by the school.
I was actually interviewed by two faculty, rather than the usual one faculty and one student. I did not prefer this format. The two were sitting rather close but far apart from each other, so splitting my attention between the two while I spoke nearly got me dizzy. It was NOT as relaxed as everyone makes it out to be because with a 2-on-1 interview, it's much more difficult for the interview to flow like a conversation. The interviewers took turns asking questions and they were much trickier and difficult to answer (at least about yourself) than my other interviews. The interviewers almost lost their personalities as soon as it was my turn to be asked questions, and then became people again when it was my turn to ask questions at the end. It was really intimidating. I also was very UNimpressed with the clinicals director - he was rapid-firing questions at us applicants at a very vulnerable time and completely ignored some people in the room. I found him to be borderline unprofessional. The area is gorgeous though - great for someone used to the small, hometown feel. It's also great having the undergrad right there because it opens up the extra curriculars like sports and music so that it's not always the same 30 people participating! It's a very active campus, and the cafeteria was fantastic. Save room for a big burrito!
It's a LONG day, however, it really gives you the opportunity to see what it would be like to spend a lot of time there. First we wrote a quick essay, and sat in on a class. Then the Clinical Director gave us a talk. Then Janelle (the Admissions Director) told us everything we needed to know about Pacific and Financial Aid. Then a representative from Student Services came and talked for about 15 minutes. Then lunch. Then tours and interviews. Last, everyone got together and had dessert and talked with the faculty (my favorite part).
Pacific held an Interview Day, and I was with ~15 other applicants. We got a tour of the school, sat in on a class, faculty lunch, student panel, and of course, the interview. It was very laid back and I felt like I got a good impression of the school, and what it had to offer.