SDN Logo
 
 

Rush University Rush Medical College Interview Feedback Summary

Chicago, IL

Allopathic Medical Schools | Private Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 21% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiring about personal experiences such as overcoming challenges, taking shortcuts, interacting with diverse individuals, explaining research, and discussing ethical scenarios like smoking cessation. Some interviews were structured in the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format, which may involve signing a nondisclosure agreement due to the specific nature of the questions asked.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting questions asked at Rush University Rush Medical College discussed a wide range of topics from personal experiences to ethical dilemmas. While there were no standout questions, some interviews included ethical scenarios, discussions on hobbies, patient interactions, and future healthcare trends, with a mix of standard and thought-provoking inquiries, potentially in an MMI format with nondisclosure agreements in place.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Rush University Rush Medical College discussed a wide range of topics, including ethical dilemmas, personal attributes, handling stress in medicine, and resolving healthcare issues. While some students faced specific questions related to genetic testing, conflict resolution, and personal experiences, others navigated scenarios involving patient care decisions and healthcare system improvements.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing their primary and secondary applications, conducting mock interviews, researching the school's website, and reading feedback on sites like SDN. Many also practiced answering common interview questions and sought advice from alumni or current students.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and enthusiasm of the students, faculty, and staff at Rush. The collaborative environment, supportive atmosphere, and emphasis on community service opportunities were commonly highlighted as positive aspects of the school. Suggestions included improving communication with applicants prior to interviews and increasing responsiveness from the admissions office.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the long and tiring interview day, lack of engagement or warmth from interviewers, disorganization in interview scheduling, high tuition costs, limited facilities (such as no gym or outdated library), and the intensity of some interviewers. Suggestions included improving interviewer friendliness, streamlining the interview process, enhancing facilities, and addressing the high costs associated with attending the school.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known more about the interview format and specific types of questions asked, such as how some interviews were more conversational while others focused on ethics. They also recommended being prepared with questions for the admissions team, dressing comfortably for tours, and being aware of traffic conditions when traveling to the interview.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the Rush interview experience to be structured, with a mix of open and closed file interviews. Most feedback highlighted the friendly and down-to-earth nature of interviewers, the emphasis on knowing oneself and motivations, and the positive impression of Rush School as a welcoming and community-focused institution. Some applicants mentioned specific interview styles, varying stress levels, and aspects of the campus and student life that influenced their perceptions of the school.
  • The open file interview was more structured and there was a pre-set list of questions you had to go through while the closed file interview started more general and followed the conversational flow.
  • All of my interviewers were straight and to the point. They were not particularly warm or smiley, which is ok, it's just a change from some of the other interviews I've attended. I would characterize it as a "pressure interview," they definitely pushed me on some points I'd written about or responses I made.
  • they really care abt you as a student and your fit with rush
  • Jill, the one in charge of admissions was somewhat obnoxious over the phone and very bad at returning emails.
  • Nothing - came out feeling very impressed!

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggest that the admissions office provide more clarity on when to expect feedback after interviews and maintain consistency in the interview process. Additionally, they recommend updating the website with pertinent information, offering a contact number for inquiries, and standardizing the interview process.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Friends or family or with friends or family.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

N/A

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2023-24 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average Virtual
2022-23 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Poor Virtual
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2021-22 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Average N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Poor N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2015-16 N/A Average N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A