SDN Logo
 
 

Ross University School of Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

St. Michael

Allopathic Medical Schools | Private For-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 31% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.0
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 577 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about reasons for pursuing medicine, strengths and weaknesses, experiences in healthcare and volunteer work, family support for attending medical school, and adaptability to challenges like living in a different country or attending an accelerated program. Some respondents mentioned a game of 50 questions resembling an MMI format, indicating a comprehensive assessment of candidates that may involve non-disclosure agreements.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting question asked at Ross University School of Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, from ethical scenarios and personal transformation to family opinions on pursuing medicine and adapting to island life. While some responses indicated a standardized list of typical questions, others highlighted more thought-provoking inquiries, with a mix of personal, ethical, and future-oriented queries likely encountered in an MMI format, potentially bound by nondisclosure agreements.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at Ross University School of Medicine discussed various topics including gaining trust of patients skeptical of healthcare, giving placebos, ethical scenarios, reasons for pursuing medicine, academic challenges, personal values, and handling adversity. The interview format may have been an MMI with some respondents mentioning nondisclosure agreements, while others experienced relaxed and conversational interviews with standard questions and ethical scenarios.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 1 person.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at a regional location.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by utilizing resources like Student Doctor Network, ValueMD, and the Ross website, as well as reviewing their application materials and engaging in mock interviews. They also focused on practicing common interview questions, researching the school and its programs, and being ready to discuss their personal experiences and motivations for pursuing medicine.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness, warmth, and professionalism of the interviewers and admissions staff. They appreciated the welcoming and relaxed atmosphere during the interview process, as well as the thoroughness and openness in addressing questions and concerns. Suggestions included maintaining this positive and supportive environment, providing clear information about the school and application process, and ensuring preparedness and familiarity with applicants' files during interviews.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about noise disruptions during the interview, uncertainty about residency statuses, unprepared interviewers, small hospital facilities, unimpressive introductory videos, lack of organization in the interview process, and a perceived lack of interest or care from the admissions staff. Suggestions included improving interviewer preparedness, providing more relevant and engaging materials during the interview, and emphasizing the school's strengths and successes in the admissions process.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known more about the interview process, the location of the interview building, how informal the interviews would be, and to relax and be themselves during the process. Many also mentioned the importance of being well-prepared, getting enough sleep, and managing their stress levels effectively.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the interviews to be relaxed and conversational, with interviewers being friendly and making the process stress-free. Common suggestions included being prepared, bringing a CV or resume, and being oneself during the interview to have a successful conversation.
  • I think the interview went well. I hope other schools have interviewers this friendly. RELAX AND BREATHE. You can do it!
  • My interviewer said the reconstruction after the hurricane Maria SHOULD be completed in January 2019. The reconstruction may be extended, but they are unsure as of now. She also said that the LMU students are not sharing the exact same facility with Ross students. A recent significant new improvement made for Ross students is that they have implemented an individualized counseling system for clinical rotations. The students in the past received no help and no guidance while they were doing rotations; now Ross assigns one counselor (or someone similar) for each student throughout the rotation.
  • The admissions staff are very nice, helpful, and overall I feel that they give pretty good advice. Obviously they are trying to sell their school, just like anywhere, but I definitely appreciate how honest they are about the process, risks, and advice for prospective students. I didn't feel I was being tricked into attending, but rather that this was simply a way to reach my goal when other methods have failed.
  • If you are coming from NY or going through the NYC area, please give yourself at least twice the regular travel time. I gave myself an extra hour to get there and barely made it in time even if it wasn't even rush hour. Also, the interviewer was very meticulous in looking at my resume and grades.
  • Be yourself.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

The most common feedback and suggestions from applicants include improving communication by using emails instead of phones, providing timely updates on application status, ensuring a smoother process for updating application checklists, utilizing a holistic approach in admissions decisions, and maintaining consistency in interview scheduling. Additionally, applicants appreciate friendly and quick responses from the admissions office and value being seen as a whole candidate rather than focusing on minor details.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel among the responses is "Best Western".

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2022-23 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Poor Virtual
2022-23 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2020-21 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor N/A