Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 14% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview mixed with a moderate stress level, and felt they did well.
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions ▼
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about shadowing experiences, GPA-MCAT score correlation, reasons for choosing podiatry and the specific school, ability to handle rigorous curriculum, handling difficult situations, and contributions to the school community. Some respondents mentioned being asked about current events, leadership roles, overcoming difficulties, diversity, extracurricular activities, study habits, and personal motivations for pursuing podiatry, with indications of a possible MMI format and non-disclosure agreements.
Tell me about the coolest thing you saw while shadowing.
Students said the most interesting question asked at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine varied from handling stress and criticism to discussing current events and personal interests. While some interviews were more conversational, others delved into scenarios such as managing criticism from authority figures or chief residents, highlighting the importance of extracurricular activities, and exploring motivations for pursuing podiatry over other healthcare fields.
Nothing you wouldn't expect to be asked on an interview, more so I think the questions were phrased to determine my interest in podiatry rather then my qualification to attend
Students said the most difficult question asked at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine was varied, including scenarios about personal weaknesses, handling unfamiliar procedures, and explaining academic performance discrepancies. Additionally, some respondents mentioned an MMI format, possibly subject to nondisclosure agreements, emphasizing the diversity of questions ranging from personal experiences to clinical scenarios and career motivations.
What was a time you struggled and how did you learn from it?
I always think it's hard to find a weakness about yourself and elaborate on it, so I would have to say: "What is one weakness that you have and how are you working on it?"
Hypothetically, as a 1st year resident, your physician asks you to do a procedure that is not like what you learned in school, what do you do? Do you inform the attending?
Why specialize in the foot? Why not specialize in anohter area of the body? (Basically asking me why do you want to be a podiatrist over an allopathic or osteopathic physician?)
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What are your comments on where you stayed?
No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions ▼
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing SDN interview feedback, researching the school and its programs, and anticipating common interview questions. Some also practiced mock interviews, read over their personal statement, and consulted with podiatrists or current students for insights.
Looked over everything TheRealScholl wrote in the Q & A thread on Scholl in the pre pod section of sdn.
Looked at sdn interview feedback, read up on how to work a panel interview, looked at APMA vision 2015, looked up information on the school
Went over common interview questions, why podiatry? What got you into podiatry? Reviewed my essay and activites. i printed up my courses I am currently taking and ones I plan on taking next semester (he really appreciated it)
I read medical school interview questions that I found on google, and was prepared to answer why I wanted to be a Podiatrist and why I choose that school.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the welcoming and supportive environment created by the staff, faculty, and students. They highlighted the top-notch facilities, interprofessional collaboration opportunities, and the friendliness and enthusiasm of the admissions team and student ambassadors as key positive aspects of their experience. Suggestions included more interactions with current students and ensuring equal access to facilities shared with other programs.
The presentation at the beginning of the interview day done by the staff was very informative and they were very supportive.
The faculty and staff take their interprofessional and teamwork motto to heart. Plus they all made sure us candidates stayed relaxed throughout the day.
The faculty was extremely nice and accommodating. The tour was great and the students were enthusiastic. One of the students went to the same undergrad and requested to give my tour for that reason, so that was pretty cool. Very nice facilities and great environment.
Open door policy. Speaking with the Dean at start of the day. Classes in conjunction with students from other programs. Friendliness of admissions staff and faculty. Openness of students giving tour. History of academic success to prepare you for your future. Opportunities for leadership, social activities, and community service.
tech friendly campus, campus/library/gym all 24 hours unlike some other schools, ambassadors and other students were very knowledgable and friendly, new curriculum, proximity to Chicago, convienient on campus housing
Very High-Tech campus, friendly student relations, great location (well, its great if you like being away from the city), and access to Chicago if I wanted to go.
Facilities, Positive Relationship between Professors and Students, DPM students and other health profession students, friendliness of admissions and students, larger library than most schools, gym, good food, materials ava online.
The facilities, the people, the cirriculum and the intertwined aspects of medicine being taught at the same location. It gives you a real world experience, not just a strictly narrow minded medical degree.
The facilities were very nice, as were the people. I like that facilities are shared with the med students, and that Scholl has inter-disciplinary health professional teams. I was really impressed by the state-of-the-art technology that the school used in instruction (slides scanned in, complete dissection videos)
How approachable the faculty are and also the enthusiasm of the student ambassadors. The school also has some nice toys (imaging tools, etc.). The interviewer must have asked me at least 8 or 9 questions.
Nice school and my tour guide was very enthusiastic. Only problem I had was my interview was during winter break so I didn't get to talk with any students besides my tour guide.
He knew the podiatrists I shadowed. She went to Scholl, and he knew her and her family very well. She graduated over 10 years ago, I was very impressed. He even knew her graduation year.
The person who interviewed me was very honest with the other schools that were competitive with Scholl, and very honest on what programs I should completely disregard. The interviewer even provided reasons.
Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions about aspects such as unhelpful or negative interviewers, lack of financial aid information, outdated facilities, large class sizes, unfriendly students, inconvenient location, and unimpressive campus surroundings. Suggestions include improving interviewer training, providing more financial aid details, updating facilities, fostering a more welcoming student environment, and enhancing the campus experience.
The student ambassadors portion of the interview day was weird, felt like they did not want to answer my questions.
One of my faculty interviewers was unnecessarily negative and rude during my interview. She also looked unprepared and was shuffling through my file looking for questions to ask me.
Nothing really impressed me negatively. If I had to say anything though, the library was a little smaller than I thought it would be. However I wouldn't necessarily say it had a negative impact.
North Chicago isn't exactly the most exciting town, nor is the campus the most beautiful place I've ever visited. Other than that, however, I can't think of anything negative to say.
I found the lack of interest on the part of my interviewer to be somewhat of a negative outlook. If my interview, the one who is trying to get a feel for me before entering the school, doesn't show interest... what are the other professors like? Are they the same as he/she was?
When I walked into the building I was lost and a student asked where I was going. I told him and he proceeded to tell me this was a better school than another I was interviewing at. Just hit me as odd to be the first person I talked, but he was just a student, not representative of the admission committee.
The interviewer (prof.) asked where else I was interviewing and then told me negative things about those schools and how much Scholl is better... did not rub me the right way.
Not as integrated with MD students as DMU is with DO students.
Remember North Chicago is NOT Chicago. In fact, it is a 45 minute drive to the city on an outstanding traffic day.
The location is an boring burb about 45 minutes from Chicago. Not to say there are lack of patients to be seen during clinical or that the facility wasn't very good, but just nothing there entertainment wise.
The tour was forever!!! I did get in on my interview date, but if I hadn't and ended up not getting in I would have been annoyed with how much time I wasted walking around the school.
All they talked about was money. If you can't get a residency we've got money for a "residency genesis" program. This does not speak well for your curriculum.
One the tour they had grades posted on a board and the a majority of the class had failed the last three tests.
The accept you on the spot. They don't even wait to see if more qualified applicants exist.
The gave scholarships to everyone. One of the other interviewers with a low GPA and MCAT score (he admitted his stats to me) not only was accepted he got a scholarship. Do they have no standards?
Cost of living is high.
Great new facilities but they left the amazing clinic in downtown Chicago for the suburbs. Big mistake!
Average boards scores.
Applicants commonly wished they had known more specifics about the interview day structure, the emphasis on grades during interviews, the relaxed nature of the interview process, and the importance of arrival times. Suggestions include better planning for travel, preparing for specific interview details, and being aware of potential surprises during the interview. It's also recommended to have a snack, arrive early, and be mindful of the location and details of the program.
That the interviewers would ONLY be concerned about my grades. Although openly I addressed issues in my academic history, one interviewer kept going back to this issue multiple times during the interview. Did not seem at all interested in learning about my interest in podiatry or anything other than grades.
It was much more laid back than I thought it would be. There was no need to stress over it. It was more about "why you should attend Scholl", not "why should we acccept you" (although that was obviously addressed).
That the whole interview process was so relaxed. I know you read that a lot on the interview feedbacks, but its true. Also, I would like to have known my interviewer might act like he/she did. Took me somewhat by surprise.
Even though the students work hard, they are also more "active" and fun than a lot of students from MD programs, with lots of social events and intramural sports.
Freaking crazy drivers, I felt like I was going to die on my shuttle trip from the airport to my hotel, the guy was going 80 on the shoulder!!!
The my interview would be shorter, 20ish minutes. I totally though there were at least a half hour to an hour long, so I thought I might have done something wrong.
Applicants commonly provided feedback regarding the timing of interviews, preferring them to be scheduled earlier in the day, as well as praising the schools' facilities and atmosphere. Some also mentioned the relaxed and conversational nature of the interviews, while a few individuals expressed concerns about specific aspects of the school or interview experience.
You watch a one hour long presentation, then do an hour long student panel, then do the interview with a professor.
There are pros and cons to having the interview at the end of the day. I would prefer getting it over with earlier so that we could relax for the remainder of the day.
The school was okay but I did not feel strongly connected to the students or program. It was one of my first interviews and was good practice. The cafeteria was nice and they had sushi at the time. I left the interview knowing that I would not attend this school if accepted.
Only suggestion is to start and end the day a couple hours earlier. It makes it easier on those trying to make it to a flight, and keeps us out of rush hour traffic.
The school has adopted a vision of fostering interprofessional cooperation and has classes that allows different healthcare professions to interact and have cross talk. I believe this is a wonderful step that will lead to a more holistic approach to medicine and result in better care for patients.
Overall a great day but we had to wait a long time for interviews which were at the end of the day and then some people had to wait 40 minutes to an hour while doing nothing for their interview.
Great school. Personally, I think Scholl is the best podiatry out there. Solid pre-clinical curriculum and a lot more rotation opportunities compared to any other schools.
Relax and be yourself. The interviewers don't try to trip you up with their questions - very informal. Also, we ate around 12:15 so plan breakfast accordingly.
Overall, the whole interview was good. I was impressed by the campus itself, the students themselves, and the atmosphere in which I could possibly be learning in the future. I would recommend this school to others looking at Scholl as a possibilty.
Great school, academically and socially. Great impression of the professors and the atmosphere of the students seemed like they were chill but also hardworking.
Simply and easy interviews. You arent looked down upon or anything. Interviews are laid back, so just relax and be yourself.
IF YOU ARE AN INTERNATIONAL STUDENT: (even Canada). Please submit your transcript to WES ASAP.
Mandy, the recruiting director, was wonderful; very nice and approachable. Everyone from the staff to the doctors to the students were very friendly and approachable. My interviewer seemed somewhat intimidating, but he put me at ease during the interview. Just be friendly and be yourself and you'll do fine.
Just be yourself. They normally look at your upper level classes and put a lot of emphasis on the grades there! Make sure you have explanation for anything unusual on the trascripts/application.
Overall, one of the least stressful interviews I've had, with very easy and friendly faculty. The tour showed most of campus, including clinical and academic facilities, but not student housing. Free lunch =D
The day started with group introduction to the recruiting director and the dean of students, interviews, tour of clinic and grounds by recruiting director, tours by 2nd year students, lunch, and then a wrap up session with admissions. They seem to try to make it as least stressful as possible.
great experience. the interview was relaxed and more of a conversation. loved the tour of the facilities by the student ambassadors. they were very willing to share information and make you feel comfortable.
The day started off with Mandy going over the curriculum. We had the interview at 10:30am. My interviewer was cool but was intimidating at first. I didnt know how well I did from that interview so I was surprised later when I was told that the committee met while I was touring the campus and I was accepted with a scholarship. Now it is hard for me to choose between this school or Temple where I was also accepted. Both have great qualities to them.
Went into a room with admin person and talked about the history of Scholl and RFU, also talked about the curriculum. Had the interview, was very relaxed. There were 3 applicants and we each got a different interviewer. After that, we talked to someone in the CLEAR program. Then went on a short tour of the grounds. Got back and went on a tour in the main buildings with 2 students. Had lunch. Went back to see the admin person, and she talked with us to tell us where we stand with Scholl. I thought that was nice to let us know in person what they think your chances are. Honesty, liked that.
Basically, just knowing why I wanted to be a DPM made me very prepared for the interview. Of course this inheiriently (sp?) involves knowing what being a DPM intails and that of course prepares you for other questions. Basically, if you can show you want to be there, they will accept you. Everyone that interviewed with me was told at the end of the day that they were accepted.
I didn't like the school. The student tour guide was talking smach about fellow students and faculty. The interview was nothing of the sort. The bragged about how great they are in my opinion podiatric medicine was left them behind. The school was great. The key word is was.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office schedule interviews earlier in the day, provide clearer communication about the end of the day, and consider starting the day earlier to allow for an earlier end time. They also emphasized the importance of faster communication regarding interview invites, verification, and acceptances/rejections, along with providing additional materials to interviewees and sending reminders closer to the interview date.
Schedule the interviews for the beginning of the day.