SDN Logo
 
 

Texas A & M University Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences

College Station, TX

Veterinary Schools | Public Non-Profit

Going on an interview at TAM-VET? Add your feedback to help others!
⭐ Overall Impressions

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the candidate's motivations for pursuing veterinary medicine, their experiences in the field, conflict resolution skills, ethical dilemmas, teamwork abilities, and personal attributes like strengths and weaknesses. Some respondents mentioned an MMI format, indicating a structured interview process where questions are not disclosed, and some participants may have been required to sign a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Texas A & M University Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences discussed a variety of scenarios, with some questions focusing on reasons for choosing the school and experiences in veterinary medicine. MMI format may have been used as respondents mentioned scenarios without specific details, hinting at a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at Texas A&M University Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences discussed a range of scenario-based and personal experience inquiries, including ethical dilemmas and conflict resolution. Some responses alluded to an MMI format with questions like "What's your biggest weakness?" and highlighted a non-disclosure agreement possibly in place due to questions about testifying against a classmate and personal attributes as perceived by a friend.
🤝 Interview Format and Logistics

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had a closed file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
📍 On-Site Experience

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents rank the facilities as below average.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 2-3 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Houston William P. Hobby Airport (HOU)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by conducting mock interviews, researching current veterinary topics, reading interview feedback on websites like SDN, and practicing common interview questions with friends or colleagues. Suggestions included familiarizing oneself with ethical issues, staying relaxed, being authentic, and asking questions to the interviewers.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness of the interviewers and staff, the modern and advanced facilities, and the overall welcoming atmosphere of the university. They appreciated the personalized attention, the laid-back nature of the interviews, and the genuine interest shown in getting to know them as individuals.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions related to high stress levels during interviews, lack of personalized attention from interviewers, unimpressive facilities and tour experiences, and a general feeling of indifference or lack of effort from the admissions staff. Suggestions included providing more information about school culture and curriculum, offering more engaging tour experiences, and ensuring interviewers show genuine interest in applicants.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known specific details about the interview process, such as the training session for MMI, types of questions/scenarios to expect, and the location of the interview. Some also noted the importance of being cautious with the questions they ask during the interview and being mindful of unnecessary preparation related to grades or classes.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the MMI interview format to be nerve-racking and unnecessarily stressful, but some also mentioned that the experience was not as bad as expected and that the interviewers were friendly and non-intimidating. Suggestions included being yourself, arriving early, preparing for common questions, and maintaining a positive and enthusiastic attitude during the interview.
  • TAMU's goal with this is to more objectively assess applicants' different characteristics and ethics. I believe it's such a nerve-racking process, however, that many students end up not being able to communicate as effectively as they would if it were just a one-on-one interview with 2-3 interviewers. I know I did well in the interviews, but this was far & away the most unnecessarily stressful interview process of the 4 schools I applied for.
  • Being my first experience with the MMI interview format, the experience was not as bad as I thought it would be. The time went by very quickly and I had a pretty good idea of how to handle each situation.
  • Just a lot more pressure than other interviews i've had
  • High stress, but somewhat fun!
  • The school is impressive, but I was not impressed with staff at all. Considering the amount of work that the separate application is and that I didn't get good vibes from the interview, I don't know if I would go through the whole process for A&M again.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants suggested providing practice scenarios for MMI preparation, being more welcoming and supportive, using VMCAS instead of TMDSAS, improving friendliness and responsiveness during communication, offering group tours, and enhancing the planning and interaction during interview dates.