Applicants commonly provided feedback on the relaxed and conversational nature of the interview process at Temple University's pharmacy school. They appreciated the opportunity to have a discussion rather than a formal Q&A session, with many noting the positive interactions with faculty and staff during the interview and tour.
-
This school supposedly has a good program, but the admissions and faculty put zero effort into selling it to the prospective students, as other surveys have pointed out. Seems like they don't care about the students.
-
I think I've said it all.
-
I really wish I had gone on the tour but everybody in my group left immediately after the interview because the tour was optional.
-
I cringed at the idea of a group interview, but it was relaxed. Be prepared for a nice discussion. The other people in my group were awesome, so that may have made it relaxed.
-
Nice interview process. Relaxing and motivating.
-
It was really nothing serious.
-
Temple University has a lot to offer- sometimes I feel that it doesn't get as much promotion as it deserves. But I think that their history, accomplishments, and incredible network of people cast across the country and world, speak for themselves. I, admittedly, did not know too much about the school until I applied there, actually researched about it and talked to various people. Amazingly, every professional person I've talked to thinks highly of it or knows someone who is somehow associated to it. I have a lot of faith in their pharmacy school and healthcare center as a whole. As for the interview, from my experience, it was one of my most pleasant ones. They really just wanted to get to know us as a person, and were interested in assessing our insights, motivations and maturity. Be your best self, and be genuine, sincere and speak intelligently. They do care about the rest of your application, but at this point, do your best no matter what. Best of luck. :)
-
Good experience. being stress-free, i actually did better than my expectation.
-
There's no real way to prepare for this interview since the questions are different for each interview. The interviewer does not take notes so the school's method of evaluation is very unorthodox, if you compare it to the other schools. This was my first group interview so I was dreading it but the interview was conversational and stress-free.
-
I really like this school. The interview was more like a conversation. If I get accepted I will surely attend.
-
Group interview is not that bad. You just have to be honest, original, and be vocal. Dont just sit there and agree with what everyone is saying.
-
Interview was short and group style. good atmosphere to talk about pharmacy
-
The school program is OK. However, due to its bad location, I won't choose it.
-
Basically the interview consists of 5 interviewees and 1 faculty interviewer. The entire interview was pretty laid back and relaxed. The tour was pretty short since there weren't too much to tour about, but the students who toured us were enthusiastic about the school and were really helpful at answering our questions.
-
We were taken into the temple pharmacy museum for the interview, the interviewer asked questions we just answered, he didn't seem too enthusiastic and then we had a tour which was only showing us one classroom and one lab and that was all
-
This was my 3rd choice school. It is very well established but the area is very bad.
-
It was a decent experience, no real nervousness, your anxiety is eliminated after everyone introduces yourself which makes it a little easier.
-
Very good. Really liked everyone - fellow applicants and Temple Faculty/Staff - I spoke to.
-
The tour started with about 6 of us, then they split the group into two groups of 3 each with a separate interviewer. It was a group interview and she gave us each equal time to answer questions. It was not nearly as cutthroat as other group interviews and was very relaxed. It was an informal interview and the questions were based very largely around the answers we supplied. You really felt like there was no wrong answer and the interviewer was extremely animated which was very refreshing. Such a good experience, I just wish their facilities matched the enthusiasm of the staff. I love the location though, PLENTY of diversity!
-
The interview experience was very relaxing. The faculty, students, and administration were really nice. The students seem to really like Temple and all that it offers.
-
The interviewer was very nice. She has a very comforting smile.
-
The interview was so relaxed. It was more of discussion and not interview.
-
Overall it was a good experience and I would definitely go to Temple if accepted. The people were awesome!
-
It was more like an informational session than an interview. She put me at ease and complimented me a lot . ( i hope i get a chance, still waiting on them)
-
The interview was pretty laid back. Our interviewer was very nice. I got my letter very quick after the interview. :)
-
It was very laid-back. I was actually interviewed by a member of the ad-com, so I feel like my performance in interview will affect the decision. There were only 2 other girls there besides me. They were very nice. No one was really pushy or attention-hogging. There were times when I felt like my answers were a little vague and maybe the interviewer didn't really understand what I meant. :( One of the girls in my group went very in-depth with one of her answers (started talking about amines and specific mechanisms!)and that made me feel kind of dumb. The tour was pretty short and the two guides were very nice. They had nothing but positive things to say about the school. The equipment in the school looked pretty new, but the actual building is rather old.
-
I arrived at the school. I went on a tour. The guide was a student which was nice because we were able to get a student's perspective. The interview was a group interview. Like I said, this does not afford the opportunity to express yourself the way that you would like. You are more or less competing against 3 other people in the room.
-
Overall, I felt the interview process offered the school very little information to assist in an acceptance decision (I did get in, just got the letter a few days ago), but I had good grades and excellent PCAT scores and don't feel that the interview had any bearing on my acceptance. For those individuals with a poor academic record or below average performance on the PCAT, the interview isn't going to give you an opportunity to address shortcomings.
-
The interview went very well, but I was turned off by our tour guide. And have decided to no longer make Temple a first choice school.
-
I arrived at North Philly very early (7am) because that was the only train I could take. The area freaked me out. The pharm school itself is safe & fine, but outside of those ~3 blocks, the neighborhood is bad. The interview was not bad at all, in fact it was very enjoyable. I was in a group with 2 other applicants and 1 interviewer. It was more of a friendly chat and an interview. We were all polite, so there wasn't any interrupting or hogging of attention. Our interviewer loves pharmacy and was very enthusiastic. The room we were interviewed in is called the "museum room" and contained a lot of old pharm lab stuff, it was pretty cool.
-
It was great. the interviewer was casual, made us all feel comfortable. There was only three of us in there, which was nice. He told us about himself to make us feel more comfortable telling him about ourselves. it was a comfortable atmosphere. i got really lucky in who my interviewer was.
-
Very calm and comfortable. Just think of it as a converstaion rather then an Q/A.
-
The interview went very well. The interviewer told us a lot about the pharmacy profession and the school.
-
Some of the interviewees were poorly dressed (not in my group of 5. Some students who were waiting for later interviews needed a lesson in professional attire). The group interview was like the dinner table growing up - we were all vying for the interviewer's attention. I found, after I listened patiently to everyone else's "about me" speeches but was interrupted right at the beginning of mine, that I needed to politely jump back into the conversation so that I didn't blend into the background. All I can say is, prepare by brushing up on interview skills, and by reading up on assertiveness and on "how to deal with interrupters". I'm sure it wasn't intentional, we ALL wanted to make sure our interviewer came away with a positive, lasting impression of us.
I thought I did only so-so in the interview, and was happy to be accepted for fall 2005 (found out 4/27)! I thought my friend from summer classes, who was in my interview group, did really well in her interview...I'm waiting to hear if she gets in.
There is an essay. Our topic was something along the lines of: "Sitting, standing, running around all day: these are potential ways you might spend your workday. What is your least favorite? Justify your answer." You have 30 minutes to complete the essay.
This was the first year they considered the PCAT. I think my scores helped. My GPA was only around a 3.6 but I rocked the PCAT.
-
The interviewer was not a pharmacist and therefore didn't want to know why we wanted to become a pharmacist. As he said, "I don't care and don't want to know." I didn't like knowing that he was the only interviewer (that I've heard from students and other interviewees) that asked technical questions. He was easy to talk to and tried to put us all at ease, however, he did ask rather controversial questions. I was impressed and glad that he did, but I think the others would be stressed about that. The Temple Allied Health Sciences Campus is in the middle of a pretty bad neighborhood. Considering that, I think the admin should have sent out directions--one lady got totally lost and missed her interview. I think commuting would be difficult. I wish the campus was in a more accessible part of Philly. I didn't find the interview questions stressful at all.
-
I wished I had a little more time to finished writing my essay. I at least wanted to have three paragraphs. Also, I was dissapointed with the structure of the interview. Most of the time spent was just asking her questions. While the interview was not very difficult, I did not get to talk more about myself as to why I wanted to get into pharmacy, my current Chemistry undergrad research or about my personal background.
-
Good. Stress-Free. Everyone was nice and helpful.
-
When i got to school i saw about 15 people dressed in shirt and ties. I immidiately thought that they were here for interview, and soon to be realized that it was a group interview. Temple seems to be interviewing everyone who met the minimum GPA some admission person told me it was 3.25 minimum. There were 5 or 6 of us and was interviewed by a faculty member. he said some words regarding the school and himself and went to questioning. he had an hour to interview us so answers had to be concise and clear. you had about 15 minute or less to impress the interviewer so it was very nerve rackening. he asked each interviewee a science question. i had pH, others were not too lucky. they were asked to describe krab cycle, heienzberg's uncertainty principle, chemical bonding, etc. after that we were asked to write an essay, followed by a quick tour.
-
Overall it was exactly what I expected. The student that gave the interview was very nice and helpful. He made the school seem really good and made you want come there. Seems like they are interviewing too many people they said about 600 from 1300 applications. Only 140 seats available...
-
Scary at first , but then warmed up to the friendly interviewer Dr. Paul, but then got scared again when the admissions lady explained the volume of applicants, and "how great everyone needed to be" just to get an interview, 3.2.
The students in my interview all came from different backgrounds, economics, computer science, biology, communications. All had BS or BA. All were very friendly as well, helped break the tension.
-
The whole interview was more like a conversation than an interrogation ; )