Mixed experience; organization and communication appear average with varied impressions and occasional stress.
Based on 123 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school as average compared to other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most rank this school as average compared to other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as poor.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
Most of the responses provided examples of situational questions related to ethics, professionalism, and conflict resolution, such as dealing with employee theft, cheating, or challenging patients. A few answers hinted at the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format or potential nondisclosure agreements due to the specific wording used, suggesting a structured interview process with scenario-based questions.
What would you do if you caught an employee stealing?
If you caught another employee in the pharmacy you were working at stealing, and you heard negative things about that employee from other employees, what would you do?
Students said the most interesting questions asked at Appalachian College of Pharmacy discussed various scenarios and ethical dilemmas, such as deciding whether to profit from a new drug or give it out for free, handling a co-worker with a history of stealing, and dealing with non-participating team members. These questions suggest a focus on ethical decision-making, teamwork, and critical thinking skills in the interview process.
If you were in the interviewer's shoes, what would you look in application for this school and why?
Student Interviews: Professional student talks to you, gives you a tour, and interviews you with simple questions.
Panel Review: One faculty and a pharmacist within the area.
If you discovered a drug that is very effective and your company could produce it for cheap but they want to sell it for a high price, what would you do?
Students said the most difficult question asked at Appalachian College of Pharmacy discussed a variety of scenarios, ethical dilemmas, and questions related to professionalism, volunteer activities, teamwork, and decision-making. Some respondents mentioned an MMI format or nondisclosure agreement, indicating a structured interview process with specific types of questions and confidentiality requirements.
What has been your biggest academic disappointment? (This isn't necessarily a difficult question but it caught me off guard, therefore it was the one I struggled with the most).
Describe an event in your life that you were required to work with people "different" than you.
I thought this was an odd question in general.
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by conducting mock interviews, reviewing questions on Student Doctor Network (SDN), and seeking advice from friends, family, and online resources. They also focused on researching the school and its program to understand the institution better.
I prepared by reading the website and understanding the school. I also went on schools.studentdoctor.net because it helped a lot with the questions.
I had my parents google common pharmacy school interview questions and ask them to me, and then I had a formal mock interview with my adviser, and after that I went through the interview feedback sections of SDN.
Studying the UACP website and reading the interview feedback on SDN for various other pharmacy programs, and reading posts made by other students/applicants on SDN
Applicants were consistently impressed by the welcoming and friendly atmosphere created by the staff and students, who showed genuine care and enthusiasm for the school and its programs. They appreciated the sense of community and support, as well as the beautiful natural surroundings and the opportunities to interact with current students and faculty. Suggestions included providing more information about the curriculum and facilities to further enhance the positive experience for applicants.
The students and staff were very welcoming, they made me feel really wanted at this school.
Everyone at the school was extremely welcoming and tremendously helped to calm my nerves. It was very clear that all of the students there genuinely love the school and wanted to help make the applicants more calm about the interview process.
The faculty and staff seemed to genuinely care about the students, and the students all seemed to get along really well. ACP is like a big family because it is small.
3-Year accelerated program. Professional staff and students there to talk to you and ask to see if you had any questions. Majestic beauty of the Appalachia mountain scenery.
I love the mountain scenery. The faculty were all very nice and enthusiastic about the program. I enjoyed being able to talk to people in the student lounge before the interview as well... I felt this help me lose some of the nervousness. PLUS the school is starting construction on a new state of the art building!
Applicants were primarily negatively impressed by the isolated and rural location of the school, lack of cultural diversity and activities in the area, limited facilities and resources, as well as issues with communication and interactions during the interview process. Suggestions include improving facilities, increasing cultural diversity, enhancing communication during interviews, and addressing the isolated nature of the location to attract a more diverse student body.
I did have an awkward moment during my interview so that was the one thing that probably stressed me out.
Nothing, I truly loved everything about this school, even the small town. In my opinion, its better to be in a place with less distractions when you are obtaining a doctorate degree in as little as three years anyways.
The pharmacy school is small and stand-alone with no associated medical or academic center, the school is in a very rural area (only 1 radio station?!?!) so rotations are far away, no on-campus housing.
Treacherous mountain roads that has many twists and turns. Think of Gran Turismo but out in the Appalachia mountains where things get grim and gray. Remember to fill your tank up in Wyethville or along the way or else you may get stranded.
Isolated location, not much culture diversity, the whole city just seems on one highway on a mountain. Also, no cell phone reception, and some areas where students live in do not have high-speed internet.
The situation is a lot worse than website description.-terrible mountain road, town is very isolated, no ethnic diversity.
Interviewers were reacted so negatively on my question about Indian population and my zero number of community service.
During interview, I asked so many questions but since my interview was conducted at the second round, the interviewers were in so rush. This bothered me so much. I had few more questions to ask but I could not ask.
Applicants commonly wished they had known more about the location and surroundings of the school, including its isolation and lack of amenities. Many suggested doing thorough research in advance, contacting the school for directions, and being prepared for potential challenges like limited cell phone reception or waiting times during the interview process.
I wish I would have known that the overall process was not nearly as scary and intimidating as I expected it to be, there really is nothing to stress about. The whole process went very smoothly for me and that is saying a lot because I was NERVOUS.
If I done more research on the school since it's so new therefore it's hard to find information about it. But if I have known where it's locate then I would probably not attend the interview. I don't know if I want to spend my pharmacy school years (3) in this desserted town. Beside the fact that this school is not yet been accerdited.
Applicants generally suggest being prepared but not overly confident, having questions ready, and trying to relax during the interview day. They also mention the importance of being down-to-earth and supportive, with some noting the remote location and laid-back atmosphere of the school.
Be prepared, don't be too confident but be confident in what you say. Also, have many questions prepared to talk to fellow students and faculty member.
I fell in love with this school the minute I stepped in the door. For those of you reading this to prepare for an upcoming interview, do not stress out about it! Just relax and try to enjoy the day, everyone there is rooting for you to succeed.
Great school and program -- location became a deciding factor because you're going to be there for at least two years just didactic bookwork and volunteering during your tenure as student. If you love the outdoors or is an outdoorsy type of person this remote college is perfect for your studies.
Few people at this interview. For the most part, the previous students, staff, and faculty were very nice. I got my letter of acceptance a week later=)
You are asked a few questions by some P2 students before the faculty interview. Talking with the student that gave me the tour was the most interesting part of the entire day.
i showed up at 8:30am, waited for 3hrs before i was interviewed. had 5 mins lunch due to time overlap (interviewee before me took forever)....everything was over by 1:45pm
Was very laid back. I would just relax and go with the flow. If you don't like rural areas then you probably won't like it. Also, they seem to want down to earth people you enjoy helping the underserved.
We basically got there at 8:30 and reported to the student lounge where we had breakfast and talked amongst ourselves. Then we were split into two groups and starting at 9:00 group I had their student led tour followed by there one-on-one interview. Group II got to do their introduction and essay assignment. Vickie Keene also went over the student files one-by-one to make sure all requirements were in order. At 12 we all reported to the gym (classroom) where we had lunch and again talked amongst ourselves... then Group II had their student tours followed by interviews and Group I had the introduction/file review. The whole thing was over by 2:30.
I arrived at 8:30, had breakfast, chit-chat a little bit with the other interviewees. Each of us had our own folder to tell which group we would be in. I was in the second group, so we did the orientation first while the students in group 1 had their interviews. During the orientation, the Dean talked about the school, the financial aid, etc..etc...just trying to sell the school to us. Then after she was done, Vickie Keene, the director of admissions, passed out a questionnaire and an essay for us to write. It was easy. Then after we were done, Vickie sat down with us, one-on-one, and went over to files to see what was still missing. After that was lunch. I had to wait until 2:00 for my interview. So I just basically sat there and chit-chatting with the current students. They seemed very supportive of the school and very nice. When I walked in, they told me that they will introduce themselves and then I have to introduce myself to them. Then they have 4 questions that they ask everybody there on that day.
I was given a name tag when I got there and told to wait in a room where other people that came for the interview were also waiting. Then UACP students came in and intoduced themselves and told us to ask any questions before the interview. We were then given breakfast(which was nice).
We were then split up into 2 groups-one group were going to be interviewed and the other group was going to listen to a speech given by the dean.
I was then taken on a tour of the facility by one of the student.
I then went for my interview.
go eat breakfast, then one group goes and hears what the faculty has to say, ans an essay and a pharmacy experience questionaire. then you eat lunch take a tour and do your interview and leave
I was very disappinted by their curriculum. I thought this institution was built for serving for underdeveloped citizens. But, it seems like they do not have specific plan and existing services sounded so commonsense to me.
I had a great time. The traveling was terrible as I live in Arizona and the interview was in Virginia. The town is very small but the area is beautiful.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants generally had positive feedback for the admissions office, praising their friendliness and efficiency. One applicant specifically mentioned the excellent service provided by Sherrie Baldwin, suggesting that the office should continue their good work.