Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.
Based on 23 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the applicant's interest in the program, reasons for choosing a specific institution, future career goals, personal qualities (such as strengths and weaknesses), and self-description using specific words. Some respondents mentioned questions related to the MMI format, which typically involves a nondisclosure agreement.
Students said most interesting question asked at University of Florida discussed a range of topics including weaknesses in the program, differences between interdisciplinary terms, self-description with ten words, and readiness to work with patients in different medical settings. These responses indicate a diverse set of questions asked during interviews, with no mention of MMI format or nondisclosure agreements.
As we work in a hospital versus a counseling center, are you prepared to work with patients with severe injuries, burns, wounds, etc? (This question was longer but my memory is fading. It was certainly unexpected!)
Students said the most difficult question asked at University of Florida discussed the challenge of being repeatedly asked about weaknesses during interviews, running out of ideas and rambling. Additionally, there were instances where candidates were questioned about building a clinical program and describing themselves using specific words.
If you could build a clinical program of your own, describe the components
Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 5 or more people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had an open file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by researching the professors' work and reading recent publications by the faculty. They also reviewed program details and practiced answers to potential interview questions. Some also recommended bringing extra copies of their CV.
Applicants were consistently impressed by the well-organized program structures, quality of training, access to medical patient populations, and supportive faculty and staff. They also highlighted the welcoming and non-competitive environment, excellent facilities, and diverse experiences available within the programs.
How friendly the faculty, staff, and students were. I had heard that the people in the program were very competitive but I did not observe this at all. The facilities were also amazing; they recently built a new building for the Health Professions students.
Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the lack of friendliness among current students and some other applicants, as well as the perceived imbalance between undergrad and grad student social spaces in Gainesville. Suggestions included improving the overall friendliness and inclusivity within the university community and providing more social spots for graduate students.
Gainesville. Some of the current students were not very friendly (but some were great)
Not much :) Gainesville was small and quiet, but it was not as bad as I thought it would be. I sadly did not get to see any alligators, although they are apparently common on campus!
Applicants commonly wished they had known to bring flip flops for the nice weather and that the clinical training took place entirely in the hospital, a detail that was seen as a major positive aspect of the program.
I did not know that the clinical training took place entirely in the hospital (the clinical students do not see any counseling center patients), but this is a major plus to me.
Applicants generally expressed positive feedback about their experience, highlighting the enthusiasm of the staff and the enjoyable interactions with others. Despite the long and tiring interview process, the overall sentiment was one of excitement and anticipation for potential admission to the program.
Well, I must have liked it because I will be going there next year!
Although the interview weekend was long and tiring, I had a great time and am looking forward to hearing my admissions decision. I will definitely attend this program if given the opportunity.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should improve their responsiveness, especially by processing applications in a timelier manner, rather than waiting until after the deadline.
Admissions office not responsive until they get all applications processed (8 wks after deadline)