Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 36% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview mixed with a moderate stress level, and felt they did okay.
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions ▼
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools revolve around scenarios related to cheating, professionalism, conflict resolution, and ethical dilemmas in veterinary medicine. Some respondents were part of an MMI format interview where questions were not disclosed due to a nondisclosure agreement, emphasizing the importance of integrity and confidentiality in the interview process.
Questions regarding general knowledge of the veterinary field. Like if you know what you are truly getting into. What’s the average debt, average pay, how do you handle stress etc...
can’t share the exact questions, but they asked general questions for the most part just to get to know you and understand how you’ve gotten to where you are in life.
They really just want to know what you have done in your undergrad, how you feel about cheating and how to destress, and what you would do other than veterinary medicine
We cannot give out interview questions due to the honor code. When registering, they give you a packet that mentions at least two (possibly three) times that you cannot share questions and that it may impact your acceptance if found out.
What would you do if you saw someone cheating?
Also, what is an instance of communication you observed with a particular vet and their client, and what did you learn from it?
Tell us about a time in which you had to work in a group situation. Tell us about a time there was a disagreement in a group situation and how it was resolved.
Tell us about a time you encountered people with large differences from yourself, and how you overcame those differences. What has been your most rewarding experience in the past few years?
Tell us about the most rewarding experience you've had in the last 4 years.
Tell us about a group project you were involved in and your role in it.
Tell us about a time you solved a conflict between two people.
Students said the most interesting question asked at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including explaining vaccines to toddlers, advocating for veterinary school funding, defining professionalism, preventing burnout, and discussing favorite veterinarians' communication skills. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on responses mentioning nondisclosure agreements, with various questions probing interpersonal skills, ethical scenarios, and personal experiences in veterinary medicine.
What is your greatest accomplishment in the past for years? For me that was a softball question...I just defended my PhD in Bioengineering last September and had not expected to be asked that.
What are 5 things related to veterinary medicine you'd find at WalMart? Also, is there anything you wish we would have asked you that we didn't? (then they had me answer it)
Students said the most difficult question asked at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including ethical dilemmas, professionalism, leadership scenarios, and conflict resolution. Additionally, the interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) with possible nondisclosure agreements, as some responses referenced NDA and non-disclosure.
there were one or two ethical dilemma questions. Don’t try to answer how they want you to answer, just answer what you would do if the situation happened to you.
If an owner comes in with a cat, dog, rabbit, horse etc. (companion animals) that has a completely treatable medical problem, but they are tired of paying to treat the problem, and would like to euthanize their animal, what do you do? (I think I just over-thought this and made it more complicated than it needed to be, silly brain!)
If someone came to you with their pet that was ill and they couldn't afford/didn't want to fund more treatment and decided they wanted to euthanize- what would you do?
Why U of I? (this wouldn't have been hard, except I thought that it was going to be all behavioral so I was somewhat unprepared for the more traditional second half of the interview)
Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What are your comments on where you stayed?
No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions ▼
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by practicing with sample questions from websites like SDN, researching the school, brainstorming responses to behavioral questions, and engaging in mock interviews with friends or family. They also emphasized the importance of knowing their application well, reflecting on personal experiences, and being genuine in their responses during the interview.
Read through the behavioral-style study guide the school provided beforehand, also Googled behavioral-style interview questions, and read about the school online.
Applicants were highly impressed by the friendliness of interviewers, faculty, and students, as well as the welcoming atmosphere of the campus. They also appreciated the informative information sessions, the new curriculum and technology, and the emphasis on student support and involvement.
Even though the interviewers are not supposed to respond to your answers, they were still very friendly and still made it seem like they liked hearing your answers.
The academics as a whole is something I like. They're on 8 week rotations for classes/clinics throughout years 1-3. They are also renovating various areas of the college.
The information session (curriculum, computing and financial aid) was very informative. Also, my interviewers were very friendly and interested in what I had to say and answering my questions (even though I was their last appointment of the day!!)
The helpfulness of the school's administrative staff. The housing and financial aid reps that presented during the information session seemed extremely helpful and knowledgeable.
People were extremely friendly, it was a kind of ''northern'' hospitality that I haven't experienced before in other northern cities. I also enjoyed the feel of Urbana-Champaign.
Everyone (students, faculty, and interviewers) were EXTREMELY helpful and friendly! The surrounding area is nice and has TONS of stuff to do. The Tenant Union did a presentation and gave us a list of area landlords that allowed pets and also a list of the number of complaints each area landlord had against them. That's all good info to have!
Applicants commonly expressed negative feedback about disinterested interviewers, short interview duration, lack of organization in the interview day schedule, insufficient information provided, disorganized tours, and old facilities. Suggestions included improving interviewer engagement, increasing interview duration, enhancing organization on interview days, providing more comprehensive information, improving tour quality, and updating facilities.
One on the interviewers was slouched back in her chair and seemed completely disinterested/annoyed with me before i even started talking. And then when I was speaking she was just looking off and not paying attention.
The interview was so short I felt like I couldn't fully express everything about myself that I wanted to. I was asked only 4 or 5 situational questions and nothing directly about myself or my interests, which I would've really liked the opportunity to do.
There was not a lot of information on the wildlife opportunities. I would have liked to see the clinic, or have an info sheet about the opportunities available to students, and general statistics from the clinic.
Also, much of the day seemed disorganized. There was only one day for interviews, and it was a Monday so on the tour, student were in lab and in class so we didn’t get to see everything. The info session I went to was very specific to irrelevant information. I would have liked to hear more about the opportunities available to vet students throughout their 4 years. Any research programs? MPH or similar opportunities? How do electives work? Etc
The first year tour givers did their best, but there were simply too many interviewees compared to first years. It also didn't seem as organized on the tour front.
Interviewing everyone on the same day was a little stressful and overwhelming. Also I didn't understand why they had the interviews on a weekday, since they had to work around classes to have rooms available for the info sessions and students available to give tours.
The entire day is poorly planned. Tours were stressful, and I feel like I missed a lot of highlights about the school. There are 300 students coming all in one day, and it seems that they are unable to host that many at once.
Our tour was terrible. The girl had no idea what was going on, where she was supposed to take us, and what she was supposed to show us. She spoke so softly that no one could hear her and rushed us through the whole thing. I still have no idea what half the rooms we saw were.
Out of state tuition costs. We were told we could get loans in excess of the federal ones, which makes me think there is not a good scholarship presence at the school.
Current students hard to talk to-- often didn't really answer my questions. Day felt quite disorganized ie. I had to wander around on my own a lot searching for rooms and activities and that was definitely a little awkward. Also, tour guide v. friendly but tour VERY short and hardly saw anything :(
The facilities are a tad old, but they get the job done. Also, I asked a question and one student spent 5 minutes trying to find someone who could answer it, and when they did, that person wasn't even too knowledgeable on the subject.
A lot of down time. Slightly unorganized. Well into the info session the speaker realized that the reason why the room was so empty was because he started it 30 minutes earlier than the posted time. Glad I just happened to be nearby.
The facilities were old, they didn't really care whether I was there or not. The students seemed indifferent. Chambana is much more geared towards their almost 40,000 undergraduates, who I'm really not in the mood to deal with during my 4 years of vet school.
Not a big fan of college towns like Urbana-Champaign; facilities were somewhat old; 1st & 2nd years are mostly confined to the Basic Sciences Building.
Too many people interviewing on the same day made everything impersonal. There weren't enough tours being held. Current students didn't seem positive or negative about the school, just neutral.
Applicants commonly wished they had known that interviews were not as personal or difficult as expected, suggesting they could have been more relaxed and prepared differently. They also mentioned wanting more information about specific details, such as interview structure, tour specifics, or the campus environment, to better tailor their preparation.
That they were not gonna ask me anything about myself or try and get to know me
More about the town's location and culture. Also that we weren't going to be getting much in the way of written info/brochures, I definitely would've come earlier in the morning to attend more of the Info Session.
That the interview was closed-file; everything i wanted to reference in my own life I had to give a background on because my interviewers were not familiar with it.
Nothing...I am familiar with the campus and the organizers did a fine job so my day was great. Although, there was plenty of downtime and had I not planned my day - I would have been pretty bored.
The first hour or so of tours were jam-packed with people. After the initial wave of people, the tour groups were much smaller and it would have probably been easier to ask questions and get a more thorough tour.
They asked everyone the same questions. The questions aren't that difficult if you read over the information they give you. They say the interview is about 30 minutes, but mine was less than 20.
Applicants generally provided feedback on the interview process, with mixed experiences ranging from feeling stressed due to the interviewers' demeanor to finding it relaxed and enjoyable. Suggestions included being prepared with versatile examples, arriving early to navigate any disorganization, and engaging in additional conversations beyond the formal interview to learn more about the program.
Was not impressed with the interviewers, did not seem like they wanted to be there. And the virtual interview was not a plus
UIUC seems rather unique in its curriculum, and in a good way. There doesn't seem to be much going on outside of Champaign, but the campus is huge and it seems like there'd be plenty to do. Strongly considering this program if I get accepted.
There was a typo on the first line of the letter/packet about the DVM/PhD program, and no written information about the possible new curriculum changes, just an "announcement" saying that they were changing things-- I really wanted something to have to take home about it!
The vet students were very nice and my tour guide seemed to know what she was talking about. The other pre-vets weren't terribly friendly though (at least the ones I spoke to). Maybe it's because we were all so nervous.
I was able to show up around noon because my interview was late in the day. It was a fine time. I wish that question 1 had been "tell us a little about yourself"
It was pretty short (about 20 minutes). The interviewers were very friendly. The first half they read questions from a manual and the second half was open ended.
I was nevous for the first minute or so, but once I started yapping I calmed down. If anyone furutre applicant is invited and interested in research I would make appointments to meet those professors as there is plenty of time during the day. Plus, you get to see an additional side of the college.
In general it seemed as if they were not trying particularly hard to recruit, even though much of their materials in the packet referred to the day as ''Class of 2011 recruitment day''. The whole thing seemed rather impersonal. The tour did not offer much in terms of actually seeing the facilities they have at the school - lots of hallways and not much else. As it was closed file and intended to be a short interview, it did not seem as if the panel really cared too much about getting to know me.
I originally planned on being there at 8, but then realized that the schedule was so unstructured that I didn't really need to be there until 3:30 (my interview was at 4). I slept forever and then drove around for a while. I didn't bother to go on any tours, or go to the information session about...tablet PCs (I really don't know why they bothered with this). I showed up at 3 and ''registered'', which involved someone's secretary throwing a folder at me. The interviewers seemed tired and ready to go home. I think I did well but I don't really care anymore.
The first half was like a standardized test (''I am going to read you... good luck'' then it was just me responding to questions and they couldn't give feedback). My interview was early so I got some extra time-- this was great because I felt that the best part of the whole day was chatting with my interviewers and hearing what they thought of the program/location after the official interview was over. I wish everyone had that opportunity, as it made the place seem really great despite the aged facilities.
Interviewers: One faculty member, one clinician, one 3rd or 4th year student. In my interview, the student did most of the talking and asked all the questions. I was asked the behavioral questions, then more personal ones. There's no conversation between you and the interviewers during the behavioral portion; they just let you talk and move to the next question when you finish. After the behavioral portion, the interviewers relaxed a little and made comments to some things I said.
The interview is NOT THAT BAD! It's closed file, so they know nothing about you going in. They asked me very few questions actually pertaining to vet med and really just seemed to want a better idea of what kind of person I am.
All of the students were asked the same questions; should have gotten there earlier since no one seemed to know where to go. Over all, the day was very unorganized.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggested more frequent and informative communication, decisions sent by email, additional interview days, quicker updates on portals, and more comprehensive training for tour guides.
I would've liked to hear from them more often and been sent interesting and useful information for prospective students.
It was mentioned that decisions MAY be sent by email. I'm hoping they are! I think the open-ended questions (vs. the "scored questions" were more helpful in letting me show my personality to the panel.
Consider adding a second interview day. Your prospective students will then be able to have better tours and actually attend the info sessions and ask questions.