SDN Logo
 
 

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Veterinary Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Urbana, IL

Veterinary Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 36% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about ethical scenarios like handling cheating or euthanasia, defining professionalism, dealing with difficult situations or individuals, and reflecting on past experiences such as group projects or conflicts. Many respondents mentioned the interview format as MMI, where specific questions were not disclosed due to a nondisclosure agreement being in place.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a wide range of topics, including explaining vaccines to toddlers, advocating for veterinary school funding, defining professionalism, and handling burnout prevention. Many responses indicated an MMI format and potential nondisclosure agreements, while other questions focused on personal experiences, favorite veterinarians, and hypothetical scenarios involving veterinary medicine and retail settings like Walmart.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Veterinary Medicine discussed various scenarios such as ethical dilemmas, leadership, professionalism, dealing with academic failures, and conflicts among individuals. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) due to references to nondisclosure agreements, with questions ranging from explaining concepts to a child, addressing euthanasia dilemmas, and demonstrating problem-solving skills in different situations.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 3 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had a closed file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by practicing behavioral questions from resources like SDN, school websites, and online sources, as well as conducting mock interviews with friends or family members. They also made sure to research the school, brainstorm examples from their experiences to discuss, and have questions ready for the interviewers to demonstrate interest and preparation.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were most impressed by the friendliness and helpfulness of the interviewers, faculty, and students, as well as the informative information session and the new curriculum. Suggestions for improvement included enhancing the facilities and campus amenities and providing more detailed insights into the program's unique features.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative feedback regarding disinterested interviewers, short interview durations limiting self-expression, lack of organization in the interview day schedule, insufficient information provided about opportunities, outdated facilities, and unhelpful or disinterested current students during the tours. Suggestions included improving interviewer engagement, extending interview durations, enhancing organization of the interview day, updating facilities, and ensuring current students are more informative and engaged during tours.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known that the interview questions would not be as difficult as expected, and that they did not need to stress as much during preparation. Additionally, many applicants suggested having more specific questions prepared and being aware of the relaxed environment of the interview.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally provided feedback about interviewers' attitudes, interview structure, campus impressions, and organization of the interview day. Suggestions included being prepared with versatile examples, staying relaxed during the interview, and arriving early due to potential lack of organization.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested more frequent and informative communication from the admissions office, including sending decisions by email, providing open-ended questions in the application process, and updating portals promptly. They also recommended improving the interview process by offering multiple interview days and enhancing tour guide training for better information sharing.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 7+ hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent between $101 and $200.

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

Holiday Inn

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2024-25 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Poor Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great Virtual
2023-24 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good Virtual
2021-22 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Poor Virtual
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2017-18 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2016-17 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2015-16 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2014-15 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Poor N/A
2012-13 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average N/A
2010-11 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2010-11 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A