SDN Logo
 
 

University of the Incarnate Word, Rosenberg School of Optometry Interview Feedback Summary

San Antonio, TX

Optometry Schools | Private Non-Profit

Faith-Based

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 31% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did well.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the applicant's background, such as "Tell me about yourself?" and "What would you contribute to a professional program?" Other questions focus on the applicant's motivation and qualities, like "Why optometry?" and "What is a good optometrist?" Some respondents mentioned being asked about handling coursework and study habits, as well as their unique attributes and accomplishments. Additionally, references to MMI format, Multiple Mini Interview, or nondisclosure agreements suggest a structured interview process with specific guidelines for disclosure.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of the Incarnate Word, Rosenberg School of Optometry discussed various topics such as personal achievements, influential individuals, qualities of healthcare providers, the biggest obstacle in optometry school, self-perception, motivation for healthcare, and preparedness for college. These questions reflect a holistic approach to candidate assessment, focusing on personal attributes, values, and readiness for a healthcare profession.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of the Incarnate Word, Rosenberg School of Optometry discussed various topics including qualities of a good healthcare professional, personal achievements, returning to school after a break, and career interests in optometry. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on references to nondisclosure agreements and a wide range of questions probing interpersonal skills, accomplishments, and professional aspirations.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 1 person.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had a closed file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by practicing with SDN questions, doing mock interviews, reviewing the school's website, and preparing answers to common interview questions. They also sought insights from current students, attended webinars, and researched about optometry and healthcare to be well-prepared.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendliness and welcoming nature of the staff, faculty, and interviewers. They appreciated the well-organized process, modern facilities, and informative presentations about the school and its mission. Suggestions included continuing the positive interaction with applicants and maintaining the high level of organization and friendliness throughout the admissions process.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions regarding the lack of a tour video showcasing the school's facilities, the school's location away from the main campus, the small size and young program, a long and unorganized interview process, and the limited exposure to student life during the visit. Suggestions included providing virtual tours, improving organization during interviews, and offering more opportunities to interact with current students.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about the duration of the interview process, the location of the school campus, the need to arrive early, and the relaxed nature of the interviews. Suggestions included eating before the interview, not bringing parents, and staying at recommended nearby hotels.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the admissions faculty to be nice and helpful, appreciated the virtual interview process, enjoyed the positive atmosphere, and had a good overall experience. Some suggestions included having current students available to speak with and maintaining a professional demeanor during interviews.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office should improve the organization and efficiency of the interview process by better managing time and communication. They recommended having a debriefing session for all applicants, presenting information collectively, and splitting the group for interviews and tours to enhance the overall experience.
  • great job !
  • First of all, I was very disappointed that the email inviting me for an interview only allowed for a 30 minute time slot, yet we were there for 3 hours. Despite the misleading email, those 3 hours were not used effectively. Why would you make each student should wait for everyone else to finish their personal 30 minute interview before moving on? And during the waiting process, you repeated the same topics over and over again by different members of the staff. It felt like the process was thrown together at the last minute, and not calculated based upon time. It was very unprofessional. The worst part of this experience, was the fact that I had brought my parents with me to the interview because we had traveled out of state for this one event. They were only allowed to mingle in the lobby, and they were told that they would be invited to tour the school with us once we reached that step in the interview process. By the time we finished.... 3 hours later, all of the parents had left to go back to their hotel. I'm highly disappointed, and you should really rethink your interview process before more students are invited back. (It's not like this was your first week of interviews!)
  • Have one debriefing session that way information do not need to repeated to fill in the applicants who left for interviews. Maybe have the financial aid and other information presentation with all applicants present. Then split the group up to those being interviewed, and rest can go on campus tour with students?
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by airplane to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent between $101 and $200.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used San Antonio International Airport (SAT)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses