Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.
Based on 98 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
How do you rank the facilities?
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
What is your ranking of this school's location?
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the areaโs cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐ฌ Interview Questions โผ
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include scenarios like choosing individuals for survival, motivations for pursuing pharmacy, personal influences, strengths and weaknesses, extracurricular activities, future goals, and the role of pharmacists beyond retail settings. Responses suggest a variety of questions related to personal experiences, career aspirations, qualities essential for pharmacy, and preparation for the profession, with some interviews structured in an MMI format possibly under a nondisclosure agreement.
They showed a list of 10 people (occupation, age, and gender) and asked me which 4 I would choose to be last 4 on Earth.
They were basically the same as previously listed on here. Just be prepared to have several of them compounded into one and be ready to answer follow-up questions to your answers.
Individual interview: they basically asked me why I wanted to be a pharmacist, what inspired
me to do it, what are strenghts and weaknesses of mine, what situations have you been in where you had to improve on you weakness, what class have you had that has helped you outside of the classroom, what class have you had that you were dreading but wasn't so bad in the end,
where else have you applied, etc.
I don't really remember specifics about which was asked in the different interviews, but they asked where you expected to be in 10 years, why you wanted to be a pharmacist, your expectations of pharmacy, a non-science class that you feel has helped you, what kinds of extracurricular activities you have been involved in.
Social Interview:
1. Tell about yourself. (Year in school, what school you attend, hobbies, where you're from, etc.)
2. What made you want to become a pharmacist?
3. Tell about any leadership experience you have.
4. Tell about any volunteer work you've done.
5. What do you like to do in your free time?
I can't remember specifics but I will say that you need to show strong leadership skills, be involved in something extra curricular, research different pharmacy fields, know why you want to be a pharmacist, reservations of the field, why you are the best candidate, classes other than curriculum needed and their effect on you, specific confontration and how you handled it, and where you see yourself in 10 to 20 years. I'm sorry that's all I can remember!
Students said most interesting questions asked at University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy discussed a wide range of topics, including perceptions of the pharmacy profession, leadership qualities, personal experiences with diversity, hobbies, concerns about the direction of pharmacy, and personal qualities. While some responses indicated a variety of thought-provoking questions, it's worth noting that the interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on the mention of nondisclosure agreements and the nature of the questions asked.
Do you think pharmacies selling other products changes the perception of the profession?
What is something you are good at? (I kept listing off things, and the interviewer didn't seem satisfied with any of them. I don't know what they wanted.)
''What was a time that you were faced with social diversity and how did you deal with it?'' My answer was that I had actually read this question on an interview site and had been troubled with how I would answer it b/c I grew up in a life where diversity was minimized and that I would deal with a socially diverse person just like I would deal with any other person. I wouldn't notice their difference; I would see them as a person and deal with them like anyone else. I also got asked to talk about something that I am really good at in life. It wasn't in any certain context and it was very difficult to answer. I said that as corny as it sounds, I am a good friend and that I have proof in the fact that at the age of 27 I still have 9 girlfriends from highschool that I talk to every 2 weeks. I talked about how much energy it took to make sure that I kept in touch with them but how important that was to me. It seemed like a silly small thing, but it seemed to impress them immensely. Don't try to make up some grandiose answer. Just be real and you will come out on top.
Drawing from your experiences with pharmacy, what are you most concerned about with the direction pharmacy is heading and how does this relate to your experience?
With a recent ruling by a California judge stating that the pledge of allegiance cannot be recited in schools because of the phrase "under God," what is your opinion on this issue?
Students said most difficult question asked at University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy discussed various scenarios such as ethical dilemmas, uniqueness, conflicts, and reasons for choosing pharmacy over other healthcare professions. The interviews may have been in an MMI format with some respondents mentioning nondisclosure agreements, while common questions included dealing with conflicts, personal traits for pharmacy, and concerns about entering the profession amidst healthcare advances.
Specific questions about medical marijuana law. Really?
Imagine you work for a corporation who've developed a product to help prolong the life of a child with X disease (can't remember what) by one year. However, this drug will not make any profit with all costs considered. Your company can make a wrinkle reducer that is similar to botox, not groundbreaking in any way but will generate substantial profit. What would you do?
In concluding, the interviewer told me about an outstanding applicant that was international, had worked voluntarily for an organization to help AIDs, and just really knew exactly where she was going in life, etc. etc. Then asked me "so how can we remember you?" ummm...well after that story I didn't look very special by comparison. It was difficult to come up with a response to how I stand out, after I already anwsered questions about why I would be unique to UK, why I'm better than the other candidates, what specific skills make me suitable for this program, etc. So make sure you have a good conclusion prepared.
No question was out of the blue, but I think the most difficult one was why I wanted to be a pharmacist instead of being a doctor, nurse or anyone else in the health profession. I had prepared myself to answer why I wanted to be a pharmacist, but not to compare it to other professions.
all typical question. Describe something u are really good at then you found out you are not so good at it, how did you respond in situation like this? what kind of question is this?
Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
How many people interviewed you?
Most respondents were interviewed by 5 or more people.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as high stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
What was the style of the interview?
Most respondents had a in a group interview.
What type of interview was it?
Most respondents had a closed file interview.
Was this interview in-person or virtual?
Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses
Where did the interview take place?
Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Many applicants prepared for the interview by conducting mock interviews, studying common questions from resources like SDN, and researching the school's program. They also emphasized the importance of practicing responses to potential questions, reading pharmacy-related materials, and seeking advice from peers who had gone through the interview process.
I prepared for the inteview by reading Pharmacy Times magazine. It got me in tune with current career opportunities as well as with problems in the pharmacy industry today which came up several times in my interviews. You can get a free subscription to this magazine as a student. I also thoroughly read over my application essay, although this was a closed-note interview and they'd never seen it, and I researched the college website. The biggest help to me was this website. Go through every interview review and paste the questions that they were asked into a Word document and review them. Think about how you would answer them. I got asked many of them that I would not have been prepared for otherwise. Also, type up a list of your own questions. In my personal interview, they suddenly stopped asking me questions and asked me what questions I had for them and that lasted a good 10-15 minutes. I asked things such as: do you think that UK's current curriculum prepares one for one area of pharmacy better than any other?? Do you think that pharmacists will some day be able to presribe certain medications and do you think that the current schooling prepares one for that or will further classes be required for me?
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the friendliness and welcoming atmosphere of the interviewers and faculty, as well as the state-of-the-art facilities and resources available. They appreciated the laid-back and conversational nature of the interviews, and the genuine interest shown in getting to know them as individuals.
Everything everything everything. The new building is incredible, people are extremely friendly and they let you know that they are there for YOU and they will make sure that you get the job/internship/residency YOU want after 4 years!
Every interviewer was very positive and seemed to be truly interested and excited to get to know me. You don't need to give some immaculate answer to a question; you just need to show that you are friendly, truly intersted in the profession, and willing to learn.
Applicants were negatively impressed by various aspects including the lack of on-campus interviews, high out-of-state tuition, uncomfortable interview settings, repetitive questions, and intimidating interview atmospheres. Suggestions include providing more welcoming interview environments, reducing repetitive questioning, and ensuring a smoother interview process for candidates.
The admissions coordinator went out of her way to tell us how friendly all the interviewers are. Then went on to say how they are not allowed to give any form of non-verbal communication (smiling, nodding, laughing, hand gestures etc. Stone faced robots are not friendly at all. Interview questions needed some specific knowledge.
I didn't like the location at all. I didn't realize Lexington had grown so much...but the urban planning was terrible. Still two lane roads and one way streets for the city of a population the same size as cities that have 4 lane highways going into them...makes traffic ridiculous. I didn't know it would be like Boston. Nowhere to park at all, the weather the day I went was gloomy, windy, and freezing. Construction everywhere.
Also...no tour of the facilities.
I wasn't impressed with the fact that the interviews weren't held on campus, but they can't really help that right now. The pharmacy building is too small. We also started the day by introducing ourselves (in front of all the other candidates there). We had to tell where we were from, where we went to school, and they asked us to share where else we had interviewed. I don't know why this was neccessary.
Nothing really. The only thing that made me nervous was when the Dean spoke to us prior to the interview process and told us that their only mistake was letting too many individuals leave that day thinking that they'd done a good job when they had not. He meant that they are kind to everyone and make them as comfortable as possible, which I believe was true.
A few of the interviewers were fast to draw conclusions based on our answers and they were uncaringly fast at asking follow-up questions which felt like attempts to discredit our answers.
It was pretty hard to get a word in edgewise during the group and social interviews and when you finally get a chance to speak, then the interviewer will interrupt and try to change the question. Also, it seemed like pretty much everyone at my interview already had their degree or was planning on graduating this spring with a degree.
In my one-on-one interview, the interviewers concentrated on the same question for about 15 minutes, so I really didn't get to tell them as much about myself as I would have liked.
There was one man in the group interview that intentionally raised questions that were difficult to answer and caused everyone to feel uncomfortable. Also, I was asked why I chose pharmacy and where I see myself in the next 20 years in all three interviews.
Being first to answer a series of general qusetions about your activities, jobs, service, etc. Being first, I was disappointed that I forgot to mention things others stated because I had only 5 seconds to prepare rather than several minutes.
There were 3 interview sessions of 25 minutes each: individual (me with a pharmacist and an administrator), social (me with 4 peers, 2 current students and an administrator), and group (me with same 4 peers, a current student, pharmacist, and 2 administrators). The group interview was somewhat intimidating due to the atmosphere and the questions.
Many applicants wished they had known ahead of time that interviews were not as stressful as imagined, and that interviewers were more interested in getting to know the applicants personally rather than grilling them on specific topics. They also suggested being prepared to ask questions, showcasing leadership skills, and being aware of the location logistics in advance.
The complete lack of humanity that any of my interviewers demonstrated and the degree to which they expected answers on specific topics (medical marijuana, some pharmaceutical knowledge).
That I wouldn't like the city. I thought Kentucky would be gorgeous but I didn't realize UK was in the CENTER of the city and not on the outskirts. Although, if you're a city person you will probably like it I suppose.
I wish that I had not been as nervous as I was prior to the interview. They aren't their to grill you or find out how smart you are. Someone looks over your grades and screens you before you get to the interview. These individuals are here to screen you on another level. They don't ask you about your grades or academics. They only want to get to know you as a person and find out out how well you do in social situations, why you want to be a pharmacist, what you like to do in your spare time, etc...
There were 10 interviewers. None of them had seen our resume so every interview was blind. 3 of the interviewers were students, 1 of them was faculty and the remaining 6 were practicing pharmacists.
The Dean and interviewers there were relatively nice but you could easily see past it. I could tell that they really didn't care about me because they were too busy caring about the reputation of their school. During the individual interview, it seemed like half of the time I was talking, they must have been thinking about other things because they would turn around and ask a question which I had pretty much already answered in the question before (especially when it came to activities and leadership things that I've been involved with).
That the interviews as a whole were not very stressful. They are just a way for faculty and the admissions committee to get to know you, and to get to know your personality.
There really is no point in trying to outdo the other people in your group interview (as some people did in mine); they really look at you individually.
It wasn't nearly as stressful as I'd imagined. I wish I'd been more relaxed going into the first interview. Also, I didn't have any questions planned to ask the interviewers, and other people were asking questions.
Applicants generally commented on the positive aspects of the school and interview process, with some expressing nerves but ultimately feeling at ease with the conversational style of the interviews. Suggestions included being oneself, preparing general answers, and not comparing oneself to other candidates during group interviews.
The interviews were very short. Too short I think. It is hard to get to know a person in 20 minutes. The first interview is a two-on-one with a faculty member and a practicing pharmacist. The 2nd interview is a group with three other interviewees. The group interview is not converstational-style so don't worry about competing for time to talk. They ask a question and each person answers the question. The two-on-one interviews is all about your specific skills, what makes you unique, why you're so great, why pharmacy, etc. The group interview is more practical application questions about the field of pharmacy. Where do you see pharmacy heading, what sort of changes do you think need to be made in pharmacy, etc.
The day was fairly laid back. The only part I thought was stressful was the one on one interview. The group interiews seemed almost pointless because each person hardly got time to speak. I also didn't know that there would be an intro session for a whole hour before we started interviews. This was conducted by two secretaries from the pharmacy school. The dean never spoke, nor did I see him.
Overall, I had a very positive interview experience. I won't lie. I was more nervous than I've ever been in all of my life, but looking back it was not warranted. As long as you know what you like to do in your spare time, what you are good at in life, why you are there and why you love pharmacy, you'll be fine. I was impressed with how comfortable the interviewers made me. They weren't there to drill me with questions, just to make conversation and get to know me. If you are a well spoken individual with pure intentions you'll have no trouble getting through the interview.
3 interview sessions, two group interviews, one one on one interview.Each with 2-3 interviewers, made up of local community pharmacists and pharmDstudent, professors.
Everyone, with the exception of 2 of the interviewers, was polite and professional. Since I was nervous I didn't feel like I was able to truly express myself. Just be yourself because the interviewers will pry until they think they can see who you really are underneath your credentials.
About 80% of the students there would have had a bachelor degree before their entrance to pharmacy school which gave them an edge when compared to my 2 years of community college.
About 90% of the students wore black suits, including the women.
Once you get there, the Dean asks everyone to introduce themselves (there were 15 people there) and then he speaks for about 30 minutes about the program and answers any questions that people ask. Afterwards, I went straight to my individual interview (with one faculty and one pharmacist) and that lasted 20-25 minutes, which was a little shorter than scheduled, but it was relatively laid back. Then, we (me and 4 other students) had the social interview (with one faculty and 2 third year pharmacy students) which lasted about 30 minutes. Lastly, we (me and the same 4 students) had the group interview with 4 interviewers where everyone sat at a round conference table and that lasted about 20 minutes. You'll have only 5 minutes between each interview.
The interview experience was better then I expected. I had the individual interview first which is usually you and two interviewers however some of the interviewers were unable to attend so my interview along with a few others was one-on-one. Then there was the social interview with was a group of five being interviewed by someone from the college of pharmacy and two students. Lastly, I had the group interview. The goup interview was less relaxed then the other interviews and it involved the five students being interviewed by three practioners and one third year student.
The experience was pretty positive. It was done in three parts, a group interview, a social interview, and an individual interview. The group and social interviews were more stressful because even though I knew I shouldn't, I found myself comparing my answers to those of the others in my group. The interviewers mostly just wanted you to be comfortable and relax so that they can know you.
Very positive. Very laid back because even though I was a little nervous at first, something that everyone should remember is that all of the other applicants are nervous too.
There were three interviews: one, a social interview with 4 other students; two, a group interview with the same 4 students; and my individual interview. I thought the set up of the interviews was wonderful, but I felt like I could have answered more questions that pertained to pharmacy itself.
There are three components of the interview:
1. Social - Five students with 3 interviewers from the college.
2. Group - Same five students with 4 interviewers (a current PharmD student, and three practicing pharmacists).
3. Individual - 1 student, and two interviewers (a practicing pharmacist and a professor.)
The interview lasted about 2.5 hours. There is a welcome session to discuss any questions you may have about the college or the interview process. Each of the three interview sessions lasts 25 minutes.
My advice is to practice answers to general questions and don't feel like you have to top everyone else's answer in the group session. You are judged individually, not in comparison to one another.
First, a group of myself and 4 others went into a "social" interview and described ourselves, jobs, service, leadership, etc. Then we went into a room and answered questions about pharmacy before a panel of 4 interviewers. Last, an individual interview was given by 2 interviewers.
They had us split up into 5 per group. The first interview I did was the one-on-one with a pharmacist and a phD. The second interview was with a teacher and two students. The third interview was before a panel. We were kept in the same group and asked the same questions. (See below)