SDN Logo
 
 

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Interview Feedback Summary

New Brunswick, NJ

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 34% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about motivations for pursuing medicine, handling ethical dilemmas, discussing strengths and weaknesses, experiences in healthcare, views on controversial medical topics like euthanasia and stem cell research, and personal background including family and academic history. Some respondents mentioned being asked about their opinions on specific scenarios related to patient care and medical ethics, indicating the interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) with potential nondisclosure agreements.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School discussed a wide range of topics including ethical dilemmas, personal motivations, and hypothetical scenarios. While some responses indicated a focus on ethical issues like euthanasia and abortion, others highlighted questions about personal experiences, patient care, and the impact of technology on healthcare. The interviews may have been MMI format as multiple responses mentioned ethical scenarios and some respondents noted a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School discussed various ethical dilemmas, healthcare challenges, and personal reflections, including scenarios on physician-assisted suicide, patient noncompliance, and uninsured individuals. The interview format may have been an MMI, involving role-playing and hypothetical situations, with some respondents mentioning nondisclosure agreements or confidentiality constraints.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 1 person.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing resources such as Student Doctor Network (SDN), mock interviews, school websites, and current medical issues. They also focused on reviewing their AMCAS application, reading about ethical dilemmas, and discussing with current students or faculty members.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were positively impressed by the community outreach opportunities, friendly faculty and students, modern facilities, strong emphasis on research and community service, variety of joint degree programs, relaxed and supportive environment, and the continuous expansion of facilities and resources. Many appreciated the warm and welcoming atmosphere, the high level of student satisfaction, the flexibility of the curriculum, the focus on clinical experiences, and the affordable tuition options.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions about the lack of engagement from interviewers, dated facilities, disorganization in scheduling and tours, emphasis on research over clinical exposure, fragmented campuses, necessity of a car for commuting, unenthusiastic students, and unprofessional conduct during interviews. Suggestions included improving interviewer training, enhancing facilities, providing clearer information about campuses, and fostering a more positive and welcoming environment for applicants.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wish they had known more about the specific details and logistics of the interview day, such as the locations of different campuses, parking challenges, and the potential for delays. They also highlight the importance of being prepared for ethical and healthcare questions, as well as the significance of understanding the school's emphasis on dual degree programs.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally found the schools to be welcoming with friendly faculty and students, though some noted concerns about campus facilities. Feedback indicated a mix of conversational and challenging interviews, with a focus on ethical questions and a need for preparedness on healthcare topics. Overall, the interview experiences were positive, highlighting the school's value, opportunities, and supportive atmosphere.
  • Schools seems really great to attend, yes the building is a bit old compared to neighboring Public Health and Pharmacy schools but Rutgers is very quick to fix anything, whether its a broken light, wobbly desk, any technological issue, etc. Everyone is extremely friendly and welcoming and from what was shared, it seems that the faculty really care about the students and their wellbeing. MMI was a bit tough because it was a new experience but after the first few prompts, you get used to how to present yourself and answer the questions.
  • Be prepared to think a bit during the interview and answer everything in a consistent manner. Don't let the time frame dissuade you from finishing your discussion with your interviewee.
  • Great school for the value. Some people are turned off by it because it is VERY suburban, but it's super easy to get to the city....and let's face it - you're going to be studying most of the time. You can see how the school keeps the tuition low by cutting down on the non-essentials (for example, you have to pay for the gym).
  • underrated school--great place to be with tons of opportunities.
  • I interviewed in NB and went to the tour in Piscataway.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants suggested that the admissions office offer practice MMI questions, reduce the waiting time for decisions after interviews, improve scheduling efficiency for tours, provide clearer travel instructions, and consider offering snacks in waiting areas. Some also mentioned combining the interview and orientation sessions on the same day, providing longer tours, and quicker decision-making processes.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are in state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Friends or family or with friends or family.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel is Radisson Hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2022-23 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good Virtual
2019-20 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2018-19 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Poor N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A