SDN Logo
 
 

University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

Kansas City, MO

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 42% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview generally impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
7.1
Good

Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.

Based on 123 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school as average compared to other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about diversity, motivation for studying medicine, ethical dilemmas, strengths and weaknesses, leadership qualities, personal accomplishments, and future goals in medicine. Many respondents referenced an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) format, indicating a structured interview style where specific questions are not disclosed due to a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine discussed a variety of topics such as social justice, personal values, reading preferences, self-reflection, and hypothetical scenarios related to professionalism. The interviews seem to encompass a range of thought-provoking questions aimed at assessing character, critical thinking skills, and future aspirations, with no explicit mention of an MMI format or nondisclosure agreements.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said most difficult question asked at University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine discussed various scenarios such as handling unfair criticism, motivations for studying medicine, biggest healthcare problems, facing authority, and challenges in healthcare delivery. Additionally, respondents mentioned an MMI format where questions covered personal experiences, ethical dilemmas, and critical thinking, potentially under a nondisclosure agreement.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing sample MMI questions, practicing with mock interviews, researching the school's website and curriculum, and staying updated on current healthcare topics. Many also utilized resources like SDN, online forums, and books to practice answering potential questions and sought feedback from medical students or professionals to refine their responses.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were mostly impressed positively by the friendliness and helpfulness of the students, faculty, and interviewers, as well as the unique and organized structure of the program. They appreciated the thorough information sessions, the hands-on training opportunities, and the focus on clinical rotations. Some suggested improvements in terms of organization and facilities, but overall, the positive interactions and unique aspects of the program left a lasting impression on them.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about timed and scripted interviews, large group sizes making the process intimidating, lack of organization in scheduling and interview structure, and concerns about residency placement and location. Suggestions included more personalized and natural interviews, better organization of the interview process, and more transparency about the program's outcomes and surroundings.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known ahead of time about specific school policies, such as AMCAS withdrawal implications and the inability to withdraw applications once enrolled. They also emphasized the importance of dressing professionally for interviews and being prepared for program costs.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally provided feedback on the interview process, including positive experiences with the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format, interactions with interviewers, and the overall structure of the interview day. Some expressed concerns about specific aspects of the program, such as facilities or the interview atmosphere, while others highlighted the friendliness of the faculty and students. Suggestions included arriving early, preparing for interview questions, and being confident during the interviews.
  • The interview overall went smoothly; however, I feel like interviewees did not have the chance to make connections with the interviewers.
  • I really enjoyed the MMI process, I thought it went very smoothly
  • I felt more comfortable with the MMI than a regular interview.
  • MMI isn't nearly as bad as I thought it would be. I stressed out a lot more than was necessary.
  • A current student told me to go to another school if I get in somewhere else, because the student has not had the greatest experience with this school.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office improve communication by providing clearer directions, advanced notice for interviews, and consistent use of the preferred communication method. Additionally, they recommended enhancing the applicant experience by offering opportunities to interact with current students and gaining insights from MD students in order to better understand the student life experience.
  • Give people directions about parking, give people more advance notice of interview date, don't send a pointless thank you card to interviewees, AMCAS fee waiver yet still charged for secondary, specifically stated snail mail communication yet used email for final decisions, some of your admission staff is kind of rude.
  • We didn't get to meet with many current students or ANY M.D. only students which left a little to be desired as far as understanding what it is actually like to be a student there.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Kansas City International Airport (MCI)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses