SDN Logo
 
 

University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine

Kansas City, MO

Allopathic Medical Schools | Public Non-Profit

Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 42% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview mixed with a moderate stress level, and felt they did okay.
⭐ Overall Impressions

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school as average compared to other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about diversity, failure and overcoming challenges, motivations for studying medicine, ethical dilemmas, strengths and weaknesses, as well as scenarios related to healthcare systems and patient care. Additionally, many respondents mentioned being interviewed in an MMI format, potentially subject to a nondisclosure agreement regarding specific questions asked during the Multiple Mini Interview.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said the most interesting question asked at University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine discussed a variety of topics including social justice, personal values, book preferences, dealing with group dynamics, and future career aspirations. While some responses mentioned specific interviewers trying to advocate for applicants, the interview format was not consistently identified as an MMI, and no mention of a nondisclosure agreement was made.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine discussed a range of topics including unfair critiques, motivation for studying medicine, biggest healthcare problems, going against authority, personal challenges, and ethical scenarios. Some responses hinted at an MMI format, possibly indicating a nondisclosure agreement regarding specific questions asked during the interview process.
🤝 Interview Format and Logistics

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of 20 - 30 minutes.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had an open file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.
📍 On-Site Experience

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents rank the facilities as below average.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 0-1 hour traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by automobile to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent less than $100.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Kansas City International Airport (MCI)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as average.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by reviewing sample MMI questions, practicing with mock interviews, researching the school's website and curriculum, reading on current healthcare topics, and seeking guidance from online resources such as SDN forums and this website. Many also engaged in mock interviews with counselors, faculty, or friends, and practiced answering questions to feel more confident and prepared.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were positively impressed by the friendliness and helpfulness of the students and staff, the organization of the interview process, the unique program structure with early clinical exposure, and the thorough information sessions provided about the school's curriculum. Suggestions included ensuring better organization during interviews, maintaining the positive and helpful attitude of staff and interviewers, and emphasizing the unique aspects of the program to prospective students.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the interview process, including timed interviews, scripted questions, large group sizes, and disorganization. They also mentioned issues such as lack of familiarity with interview materials, long wait times, and concerns about residency placements. Suggestions for improvement included more personalized and natural interviews, better organization, and more thorough campus tours.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly wished they had known about potential financial implications, such as high costs and limited financial aid, associated with attending the program. They also highlighted the importance of being prepared for specific admission processes, such as the impact of withdrawing from other schools and the nature of admission tests, while emphasizing the significance of professional attire and being mindful of the school's unique program structures.

What are your general comments?

Applicants commonly mentioned that the interview process went smoothly, with a mix of positive and negative experiences. They highlighted aspects such as the importance of making connections with interviewers, the structure of the interview day, including the MMI process, and the need for preparation and confidence during interviews.
  • The interview overall went smoothly; however, I feel like interviewees did not have the chance to make connections with the interviewers.
  • I really enjoyed the MMI process, I thought it went very smoothly
  • I felt more comfortable with the MMI than a regular interview.
  • MMI isn't nearly as bad as I thought it would be. I stressed out a lot more than was necessary.
  • A current student told me to go to another school if I get in somewhere else, because the student has not had the greatest experience with this school.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants commonly suggested that the admissions office provide clearer directions for parking, offer more advance notice of interview dates, avoid sending unnecessary thank you cards, improve consistency in communication methods, and ensure a welcoming and respectful interaction with all applicants. Additionally, many applicants expressed a desire for more opportunities to interact with current students, particularly those pursuing an M.D. rather than other degrees.
  • Give people directions about parking, give people more advance notice of interview date, don't send a pointless thank you card to interviewees, AMCAS fee waiver yet still charged for secondary, specifically stated snail mail communication yet used email for final decisions, some of your admission staff is kind of rude.
  • We didn't get to meet with many current students or ANY M.D. only students which left a little to be desired as far as understanding what it is actually like to be a student there.