Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 19% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview mixed with a moderate stress level, and felt they did okay.
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?
Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above
💬 Interview Questions ▼
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools revolve around behavioral scenarios, such as describing times when applicants faced challenges, resolved conflicts, overstepped boundaries, or demonstrated leadership skills. Several responses mentioned an MMI format, where questions were behavioral-based, and some respondents cited nondisclosure agreements regarding specific questions asked during the interview.
Tell me about a time that you made a mistake? How did you deal with it?
it was a behavioral based interview. Sorry but we are not allowed to share the questions. Just google behavioral questions and there are loads of sites to help with it.
Tell me about a time you had a decision to make (other than vet school) that you were very undecided about, and how you went about making your decision.
Students said the most interesting questions asked at University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine discussed various scenarios such as teamwork challenges, problem-solving experiences, adaptability in skill sets, and instances of breaking rules or overstepping boundaries. Additionally, role-playing scenarios, personal goal discussions, crisis management situations, and handling difficult personalities were commonly explored. Some responses hinted at an MMI format with a focus on ethical dilemmas and personal reflections, possibly under a nondisclosure agreement.
Tell me about your involvement in extracurricular and veterinary activities?
A tie between "What was a moment that you broke the rules or overstepped boundaries that had been set for you?" and "What was the best presentation you ever gave?"
Tell us about a goal that you didn't achieve. (I couldn't think of one but managed to say that when I usually set goals I do everything I can to achieve them. Also, in essence, since I learned from all my experiences, I don't think of any goal I set as a failure.)
Students said the most difficult question asked at University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine discussed various behavioral scenarios, such as overstepping boundaries, handling ethical dilemmas, breaking commitments, and demonstrating problem-solving skills. Some responses indicated a mix of standard interview questions along with unexpected behavioral inquiries, causing candidates to feel unsure despite preparation. Additionally, references to MMI or non-disclosure suggest that the interview format may have been in the Multiple Mini Interview style with potential confidentiality agreements in place.
Name a time when you felt like you overstepped your boundaries?
Tell me about a time you overstepped your bounds. They rephrased it as "Perhaps a time that you saw someone else not doing their job and you stepped in." To me, those are very different questions!
What skills do your experiences give you that you think will help you succeed in veterinary school. (This was such a normal "interview question", and they kind of slipped it into the middle of a bunch of odder behavioral questions, so it caught me by surprise and I panicked a bit)
I found them all to be difficult. I had anecdotes prepared, but I still felt unsure and unsteady that I was conveying what I wanted to about my character.
Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?
Most respondents rate the area’s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great
What are your comments on where you stayed?
No responses
✅ Interview Preparation and Impressions ▼
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
How did you prepare for the interview?
Most applicants prepared for the interview by practicing behavioral interview questions, reflecting on past experiences to provide examples, and researching common interview questions online. Many emphasized the importance of being confident, remaining calm, and practicing their responses with others to ensure they were well-prepared for the interview.
I made sure I knew all of my experiences and qualifications before interviewing. The most important thing for me was being confident and remaining calm.
I thought critically about my various jobs, leadership experience, and volunteer work so I would be able to pull from those experiences when asked to talk about past experiences.
I looked through the schools website and did some research about the school and its programs. Then I looked up what a behavioral interview was and looked up types of questions. I started practicing what I would say and came up with how I would answer different types of behavioral questions.
Read over questions on SDN from other schools that do behavioral interviews, researched vet school behavioral interview questions on google, listed as many examples as I could for answers to each question, outlined them in more detail to get my thoughts in order, practiced answering some of the more difficult ones aloud. There was really only one question I was not prepared for!
As the interview questions were blocked by the school on SDN, I reviewed the behavioral questions from all the other schools because I figured they'd mostly be the same type asked at Minnesota.
Researched behavioral questions online, then sat with my wife in a coffee shop and went through each of them, coming up with several answers for each. Practiced delivering some of them to her. Did not 'memorize' answers - just let it all stay fresh in my head.
I read over all the questions posted on SDN, did a mock interview with my advisor, reread my personal statement the night before, and read the school's brochure so I'd have a good handle on the school's strengths and weaknesses.
Read a medical-school interview guide, reviewed questions on SDN, came up with situations to talk about for various questions and practiced with a friend. The practicing was the most helpful as the interviewers managed to ask most questions slightly differently than expected, so it helped to have to practice answering questions I hadn't prepared for.
Looked on SDN for interview questions and prepared answers to those questions using examples from my life, also reflected back on different situations from my life in general. Read the book "The Medical School Interview- Secrets and a System for Success" by Jeremiah Fleenor, which, while geared towards pre-med students, I also found very insightful and helpful.
Read-up on common behavioral-type interview questions and outlined certain general life experiences I've had that I could speak about AND that were important to me that I wanted them to know about me.
I read information about the interview process on the school's website, and read SDN to try to get an idea of some specific questions they might ask (And I had seen the committment question on here, which they ended up asking!) I also tried to think of a variety of experiences I'd had which could serve as answers for different questions.
Mock interviews with profs and friends. Research behavioral interviewing process on internet. Reflected a lot on past life experiences and wrote them down/clarified them in my mind.
Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the welcoming and supportive atmosphere at the University of Minnesota, highlighting the friendliness of staff and students, the well-organized interview process, engaging student panel discussions, and the personalized tours that provided a thorough feel for the school. They appreciated the genuine interest shown by interviewers, the sense of community among students, and the impressive facilities and resources available, such as the new equine center and diverse elective options, contributing to a positive overall experience.
I really enjoyed this interview process! I felt as though the longer interview allowed me to really get to explain my experiences rather than just rush through them. The interview was very conversational and my interviewers were very engaged. Overall, the University of Minnesota was very welcoming!
The interviewers were friendly and asked follow up questions. There were a number of activities that made it clear that the school was trying to recruit me as much as I was trying to sell myself. There was a student panel that seemed genuinely happy to be a gopher.
I really loved how welcoming everyone was. Truly I had such a positive experience with their "student ambasadors" who are first through 3 year students who volunteer to give tours, mingle and eat lunch with you, as well as share personal stories and insight. They had a student panel which I thought was a really cool idea because we could ask any questions we wanted and they had a student from each year. The school/students also offered ride to the school for your interview if you were staying at a nearby hotel! What service!
I loved pretty much everything about the school. I found the curriculum to be the most impressive aspect of the program, but everything is pretty top-notch. The students and faculty alike were very giving of their time and honesty, and I left with a great impression of the College.
The interview day was very well organized and gave me a thorough feel for the school. The students were all very helpful, very enthusiastic, and seemed to genuinely like the school. Loved the supportive, close knit relationship the students seemed to have with each other.
The students were extremely friendly and were seemed really satisfied with the school. Also, St. Paul and Minneapolis seem like great cities and the area has a great social and recreational atmosphere.
Everything! Interview weekend was planned very well. Between the interview, orientation, student Q&A, tour of the hospital, school, and equine center, I left genuinely excited about the university. My interviewers were great! They were friendly, and were happy to have a discussion with me at the end that got me so thrilled about the program.
The friendliness of everyone there (including my interviewers!). I also was impressed with almost all of the vet buildings being interconnected so that you never have to walk outside.
Absolutely every staff person at UMN was very polite and friendly. The interviewers did as much as possible to put me at ease (not that it helped much, but they at least tried).
The interview was very casual and conversational. The interviewers were very positive and seemed genuinely interested in my qualifications and accomplishments. They took extra time after the interview to answer my questions, and told me that the questions wouldn't be part of the interview, a nice touch that I appreciated.
The tours were one-on-one and tailored to your interests- they showed me everything! Also, the administration was so friendly, generous and organized. Student ambassadors spent a great deal of time talking with me. It was a great day.
How friendly and generous the students were. I had all of my transportation covered by student volunteers...to and from airport, to and from my hotel. It took a lot of stress off of me. I am so grateful to them.
New equine center, decent SA hospital, that 1st years work with animals right away and 2nd years start doing surgery at the end of the year. Also, have chance to travel abroad during the summer doing veterinary work with part of the trip funded. The tour was also very personal, they tried to put each interviewee with one student.
The staff and students were very nice and welcoming; the technology; the many electives that were available even to first year students; hospital caseload.
The student panel was wonderful. All of the students seemed to be very well-balanced. It bodes well for the school's general atmosphere is its students seem academically challenged yet personally balanced, as well.
The beautiful campus, the friendly staff and students, the feeling of comraderie and cooperation among the students, huge case load, lots of hands on experience.
Everyone was very friendly and willing to answer all my questions. My interview ended up going over by about half an hour, mainly because I was asking questions (which my interviewers were more than willing to answer). The interview was laid back and the interviewers seemed genuinely interested to hear what I had to say. Furthermore, the campus was BEAUTIFUL and the facilities were amazing. I was also incredibly impressed by the sense of community between the students, and the steps taken by the University to foster that feeling.
The small animal hospital has a huge case load. Everyone was very nice and welcoming. I really liked the fact that it is located in the Twin Cities. There is a lot to do and it was easy for my spouse to find a job.
Applicants commonly expressed concerns about the lack of interaction with faculty members, outdated facilities, limited diversity, casual attire of interviewers, and the high cost of out-of-state tuition. Suggestions included providing more opportunities to meet professors, updating facilities, increasing diversity, maintaining a more professional dress code for interviewers, and potentially addressing tuition costs for out-of-state students.
I would have liked to meet some of the faculty members, or be introduced to some of the professors I would be studying under.
There is a large number of interviewing pairs, so it is very likely that another interviewee might have had a completely different experience than my own. Additionally, it seems that it would be difficult to standardize acceptance criteria.
I didnt like the cold weather, but thats not within their control. Aside from that they were very accommodating and fed us well. It would be nice if they offered free parking, however it didn't affect me because I was dropped off. Some of the other students were miffed though.
Some of the equipment and such at the school is a bit old (ex: lab benches have really old stools to sit on). Also, on the tour we weren't really able to see much; it was a lot of "down this hallway is this stuff, but we're going to go down this other hallway."
My interviewers were dressed extremely casually making me feel ridiculously overdressed in my suit. Threw me off a little as I expected a formal interview.
I wish I met some professors for the interview weekend. I know that some of them were conducting interviews but I didn't have a professor for my interview. I wish they were more involved with the interview weekend.
I also wish there was more diversity in the school. Very "white bread".
Applicants commonly wish they had known in advance about the weight of the interview in the application process and the importance of thorough preparation. They also suggest being well-prepared for a mix of behavioral and traditional interview questions, and to familiarize oneself with the program's unique aspects to ask informed questions during the interview.
Im glad that I knew how much the interview factored into my application. The interview weighs pretty heavy so it is important to be well prepared.
I wish their idea of "refreshments" on the Friday night Equine Center tour (an optional event to mingle with students and see the equine facility) had more than just cookies and cider.
There wasn't any ethical/issue related questions which they didn't tell us until the information session which was the day after my interview (interviews were Fri/Sat with the introduction session Saturday morning).
How interested the interviewers would be with my answers. I was asked a lot of follow-up questions, which I was able to answer, but was not expecting that.
That they'd hit me with the general "tell me why you want to be a vet." They advertise it as a behavioral question, so I didn't sit down and really think that one out. Probably should have regardless. :)
I wish I would have know that the interviewers were going to pull out some regular interview questions right in the middle of behavioral ones so I could have been on my guard.
It seemed like the interviewers were doing kind of a good cop-bad cop thing. I worked really hard to win over the bad cop rather than just focusing on the good cop and that seemed to impress them.
I wish that I had practiced putting together complete sentences ahead of time. Because it's closed file you struggle to include the necessary background information and to get to the point of the story in a timely manner.
How organized the student volunteers were. I was worrying needlessly about transportation and having back-up plans in case things fell through, but the students had everything covered for me.
That students would be EVERYWHERE and very available for questions. The pizza party the night before the orientation/tours/presentations on Saturday had students to talk to and between the Saturday events, even more students were meandering around.
The difficulty of choosing a track. I'd prefer to be large animal only but have to select mixed animal to incorporate both food animal and equine medicine.
Applicants generally appreciated specific feedback and encouragement to be well-prepared for interviews, while some mentioned the importance of showcasing positive experiences. They also valued a friendly and engaging interview environment, with a focus on behavioral questions and a balance of professionalism and approachability from interviewers.
Be very specific as they do not like broad answers.
I had an interview with two people and they wer very nice. I found that the whole interview was very well organized and when I got accepted the whole process of notifying us was very streamlined. Also from what I heard they kept the waitlisted people updated on their spots, so overall I would say their admissions office is very well prepared and friendly.
My interviewers were very straight and did not react much to anything I was saying, which I felt was a good thing, but didn't give me much of an impression on how I did in the interview.
I felt that the interview was very negative. Instead of asking questions in a more positive manner, they all came across as looking for negative experiences. This makes it very difficult to show your good aspects and to eloborate on your successes.
Some people had interviews on Friday and others Saturday. The people that had interviews on Saturday had an opportunity to talk with students at the information session (which took place Saturday), so I felt as though you had a slight leg up if you interviewed on Saturday.
A friend of mine thought her interview went really well; she didn't get in. I thought mine was mediocre; I got in. Don't stress over how you think you did.
This was probably one of the most pleasant interviews I've ever had. Also, they are very accommodating if you get a question that you genuinely dont have an answer to. I had one or two questions that were just impossible for me to answer (I don't really remember them, but they were just out of my field and not relevant to me at all), and I told the interviewer this and she gave me an alternate question. I got in, so it would appear that this doesn't count against you too badly.
Everyone was so nice. It was a weekend of asking a lot of questions and talking about yourself. I ran out of questions and was burnt out from talking so much.
I was glad I interviewed on Friday. I flew in Thursday afternoon and left Saturday afternoon after the Saturday activities.
A tour is given to each interviewee by 2-3 vet students and they tailor it to what you want to see/know about. The equine center is great to see the night before and you earn a lot about the school by going to the pizza party so that you can ask questions to the students.
Behavior based. Interviewers were very friendly and put me at ease and seemed interested. Really seemed to want to get to know me. The interview ran long (about 75 minutes) but went by very quickly.
The interviewers were extremely kind, and though the interview was over an hour, the time went by quickly. This was the best interview experience I had anywhere.
The interviewers were both faculty members and were very professional and responsive. Not effusively responsive, but clearly they were listening to what I was saying and asking follow-up questions that made me feel like they were interested in what I was telling them and interested in getting to know me as a whole person, inasmuch as you can do that in an hour.
Two female interviewers, one a professor of oncology and the other an employee for admissions. Both ladies were extremely nice and encouraged me to feel relaxed and know that there are no ''wrong'' answers. They really wanted me to feel comfortable and we actually had a few laughs during the interview. The interview was strictly behavioral. I think they are looking for people with a lot of life experience.
My first thought coming out of the interview was literally ''I'm not sure how I did, but I had fun!'' This was obviously NOT how I expected to come out feeling. The interviewers were impossible to read in terms of whether they were happy with my answers or not, but at the same time they seemed interested to hear what I had to say and were very laid-back.
A great experience! My interviewers were easy to talk to and with. Their professionalism was exceptional and yet they helped to create a calm atmosphere. A good balance of character!
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggest that the admissions office continue using email for updates, consider making phone calls to accepted students for a personal touch, improve the friendliness and stress level of the interview process, provide free parking for out-of-state applicants, adjust interview schedules to allow for more time between activities, and offer a more welcoming experience for in-state students on interview days.
So far so good. Keep using email to update people. Although I think phone calls to those who are accepted is a nice personal touch, so keep doing that.
Compared to the other schools I have applied to, the interview was much more high stress and cold. I understand that it is unnecessary to ask behavioral based questions but I think the process could have been friendlier. It is very reassuring a huge selling point when the school seems friendly.
Adjust the schedule so that folks who have the 'right after lunch' interview slot aren't trying to fit the tour and lunch both into one hour. I didn't want to eat because I didn't really want to rush from eating into the interview with lettuce stuck between my teeth. :) (That said, I skipped lunch and after my interview someone from admissions saw me headed out and stopped me and asked if I had had a chance to eat; so they took care of the problem!).