SDN Logo
 
 

University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine Interview Feedback Summary

St Paul, MN

Veterinary Schools | Public Non-Profit

AI Advisor

Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 19% of interviews, indicating it is highly regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a moderate stress level and felt they did okay.
โญ Overall Impressions โ–ผ
SDN Interview Experience Score
8.2
Above Average

Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.

Based on 220 responses
Score Reference:
9โ€“10 Exceptional 8โ€“8.9 Very Good 7โ€“7.9 Good 6โ€“6.9 Mixed < 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.

How do you rank the facilities?

Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.

How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?

Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.

How do you rank this school among other schools to which you've applied?

Most respondents rank this school above other schools they applied to.
0 = Below, 10 = Above

What is your ranking of this school's location?

Most respondents rate the school location as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the friendliness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.

What is your ranking of this area's cultural life?

Most respondents rate the areaโ€™s cultural life as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?

Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interview Questions โ–ผ

What is one of the specific questions they asked you?

The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include scenarios about handling mistakes, resolving conflicts, communication skills, decision-making processes, and experiences with difficult individuals. Some respondents mentioned a behavioral-based interview format, potentially an MMI, where questions could not be disclosed due to a nondisclosure agreement.

What was the most interesting question?

Students said most interesting question asked at University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a variety of scenarios such as working with difficult individuals, adapting skills, breaking rules, giving presentations, handling crises, and dealing with trust and commitment. Some responses also mentioned role-playing scenarios like dealing with a worried client as a vet assistant. These questions suggest a thorough evaluation of problem-solving abilities, interpersonal skills, and ethical decision-making, reflecting a holistic approach to assessing applicants' readiness for veterinary school.

What was the most difficult question?

Students said the most difficult question asked at University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine discussed a variety of behavioral scenarios and challenges, including situations where boundaries were tested, commitments were broken, difficult decisions were made, and innovative solutions were required. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) based on responses mentioning nondisclosure agreements, with questions focusing on assessing interpersonal skills and ethical reasoning.
โœ… Interview Preparation and Impressions โ–ผ

How long was the interview?

Most respondents had an interview of more than 50 minutes.

How did the interview impress you?

Most respondents felt positively about their interview.

How many people interviewed you?

Most respondents were interviewed by 2 people.

What was the stress level of the interview?

Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.

How you think you did?

Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.

What was the style of the interview?

Most respondents had a one-on-one interview.

What type of interview was it?

Most respondents had a closed file interview.

Was this interview in-person or virtual?

Most respondents had a virtual interview.
Data includes both pre- and post-COVID interviews.
No responses

Where did the interview take place?

Most respondents were interviewed at the school.

How did you prepare for the interview?

Most applicants prepared for the interview by practicing behavioral interview questions, reflecting on past experiences to provide examples, researching common interview questions, and discussing potential answers with others. They emphasized the importance of being confident, remaining calm, and ensuring a good night's sleep before the interview.

What impressed you positively?

Applicants were overwhelmingly impressed by the welcoming and friendly atmosphere at the University of Minnesota, particularly noting the helpfulness of student ambassadors, engaging interviewers, and enthusiastic student body. The personalized tours, conversational interviews, and sense of community among students and faculty were highlighted as standout aspects of the experience, leaving applicants with a positive impression of the university.

What impressed you negatively?

Applicants commonly expressed negative impressions related to the lack of interaction with faculty, outdated facilities, unimpressive tour experiences, casual attire of interviewers, lack of diversity, and concerns about the cold weather and high costs. Suggestions included enhancing faculty involvement, updating facilities, improving tour experiences, addressing diversity, and considering the impact of weather and expenses on applicants.

What did you wish you had known ahead of time?

Applicants commonly expressed a wish to have known the importance of interview preparation and the weight the interview carries in the application process. They also highlighted the value of being informed about the interview format, potential questions, and the overall experience.

What are your general comments?

Applicants generally emphasized the importance of being specific in responses, taking note of key words during interviews, and showing positive aspects despite negative questioning styles. They also appreciated the friendliness of interviewers, the well-organized process, and the opportunity to engage with students during the visit.

What are your suggestions for the admissions office?

Applicants suggest that the admissions office should continue using email for updates, consider making phone calls to accepted students, and focus on creating a friendlier and less high-stress interview process. Additionally, offering incentives like free parking for out-of-state applicants, adjusting schedules to allow for a more relaxed interview experience, and providing more welcoming gestures, especially to in-state students, were common suggestions.
๐Ÿ“ On-Site Experience โ–ผ

Who was the tour given by?

Tours were most commonly given by a Student

How did the tour guide seem?

Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.

What is your in-state status?

Most respondents are out of state students.

What were your total hours spent traveling?

Most respondents spent 4-6 hours traveling to the interview.

What was your primary mode of travel?

Most respondents traveled by airplane to the interview.

About how much did you spend on room, food, and travel?

Most respondents spent more than $500.

What airport did you fly into?

Respondents who flew to the interview generally used Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP)

Where did you stay?

Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.

What is the name of the hotel you stayed in?

The most commonly mentioned hotel that users stayed in is Best Western.

How would you rate the hotel?

Most respondents rated their hotel as good.
0 = Bad, 10 = Great

Would you recommend the hotel?

Most respondents would recommend their hotel.

What are your comments on where you stayed?

No responses

All Responses

Application Cycle โ–ฟ Impression Performance Interview Location
2019-20 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2018-19 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2018-19 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2017-18 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2014-15 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2013-14 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2012-13 Negatively โ˜น๏ธ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2012-13 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Good N/A
2012-13 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Average N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2011-12 No change ๐Ÿ˜ Poor N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A
2011-12 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Average N/A
2010-11 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Great N/A
2009-10 Positively ๐Ÿ™‚ Good N/A